Ya i was wondering if trek hook him up with the full carbon package. Looks great but i doubt tailwhips are going to win this contest. We going to see if the carbon can handle a big mountain throwdown.
you think you know everything about trek. it doesnt matter if your right or your wrong, you just make your self look like an ass trying to express it. every year i see you somewhere commenting about the slope bike semenuk rides and every time you are wrong. when are you going to get through your head that just because you work at a trek dealer means you know everything about trek?
I never said I know everything about Trek. I never even implied it.
However I have worked at 3 different Trek dealers since 1998 and I do have a very good knowledge of their products. I'm sorry if my knowledge of Treks bothers you.
And for the record the only time I was ever wrong about the Remedy SS was when I said that Trek would release it at some point. Everything else I have said about it is correct.
Thanks for clearing that up for us ser. Nobody knows what the hell trek does, all look the same. Put me on a remedy or session.
We dont need any back talk dhnewboy so bring your new ass to the trails and ride.
Just like to point out... Seraph, you are wrong.
Rear end is not from the Session 88, its a custom, shorter rear end made just for rampage. Thus the SS Bridge has been moved to that position to allow more tyre clearance.
Just to point out...how much of a dick move it is to point out little semantics like you just did. My point was that it is not an aluminum front end, because someone made a comment about how smooth the welds look.
i agree with dhnewboy. because when some one proved you wrong, you just go on to call them a dick. but my favorite part is when seraph goes on and says "im sorry if my knowledge of treck bothers you" but it appears that he actually has quite little knowledge when it comes to their bike. hahaha this guys a joke!
Well, looking back at this, you are the one calling everyone childish names. I'm going to move on now, because as i have proved multiple times, you are not worth the hassle.
The only person you have proved anything to is yourself. And I never called anyone a "childish name". I called you and dhnewboy an idiot, and I was not wrong.
@seraph. yes, you were proven wrong. you said it was a 9.9 front triangle with a session 88 back triangle. then charge262 went on and said that it is a 9.9 front triangle and a custom made rear one (witch he is correct) so there for you were wrong in saying that it is a session 88 rear triangle. and then you went on talking about how youve worked at 3 different treck dealers since 1998 trying to act all superior.
atuo correct on my computer bud. and if it was truly a session 88 rear end then they would be matching, but they are not. but i found it funny how sad your argument is when you take it to other peoples spelling.
So just to throw my two cents in. All the 88 rear ends I have seen have no bridge up above the tire. But it looks exactly like a seat stay from a Remedy. Maybe a remedy rear end to 9.9 front end. But again I don't think it's a custom one off like Seraph is saying. Just two parts added onto a 9.9 frame. But then it is a 150mm rear end so who knows?????