Have you ever wondered how it feels to be Mathieu van der Poel on a mountain bike? Well, this first-person downhill run might give you an idea! Wheelies incoming...—Alpecin Fenix
@Narro2: Having never personally ridden with any of them, and basing my opinion solely on some of their review comments; I guess that's exactly what I'm saying. It's either that, or they're pushing an agenda.
@Themissinglink83: The bigger Lulz is how most people eat up reviews like candy. I've always looked at reviews, for any products, as more of a sales pitch than something useful. The pictures are usually nice
@m1dg3t: Yes- because the general feel of the bike when compared to other similar bikes and a the way the best in the world at the moment can ride it on one lap are the same thing. Should they have added "If you are the best in the world this bike actually handles surprisingly well on bike park laps- though we found it did so best after winning the leaders jersey of the TDF for shits and giggles before dropping out to train for the Olympics..." It's a bit like calling people's review of a recumbent bike wrong because Voreis managed to jump it.
they didn't say you couldn't ride it downhill, just compared to other options its not a good purchase. Pro riders will be good on any bike they are sponsored to ride, just might not be the best bike for people with options.
How stable a bike feels depends so much on what you're used to. You can adapt to a lot but it takes time. These same reviewers claim that a bike with an even longer front center (and equally short rear) makes it hard to weight the front in corners or on climbs. But then still, some others (and obviously the designer of the bike) still manage to do it. It is all relative and that's fine as long as you have a benchmark. So if possible, find a review on a bike you have also ridden. Compare your perception to that of the reviewer and take it from there. What also matters is how the reviewer rides the bike. If the reviewer sits down and you stand on the pedals, you typically have more room to play with your weight so you have more control over the stability. And finally, if the reviewer is clipped in and you ride platforms, chances are you also have your weight more in the front (especially if you both are standing). I've heard some more recent clip-pedals allow for a more forwards foot placement but I don't know how much that is.
TL;DR: Don't only read the conclusion (and the comments section). Also compare how the reviewer rides to how you ride. And take a bike you've both ridden as the benchmark.
@m1dg3t: There's a good chance when doing the reviews, they (the reviewers) try to put themselves in the shoes of someone who's probably NOT world-class in multiple bike disciplines.
Not being funny but like, pros can make bikes do stuff most people can’t. Just because a pro can do a 2:32 Champery on bike A doesn’t mean it’s a great bike. That same pro could maybe do a 2:30 on bike B, or even a 2:27 on bike C, if bike C was a Commencal Supreme.
@tatchle1: yeah Danny Mac, Chris Akrigg, and Martyn Ashton did huge hucks on road bikes. Guess that means we're all suckers for lapping up all that marketing BS about suspension...
@hllclmbr: Kris Holm? Pretty sure he's still around . I don't understand the first sentence in your post though.
Either way, as for descending on a muni, front-rear balance is pretty good actually. It is never like you have too much grip with one wheel and too little with the other. Also, whereas a bicycle tilts forwards when you descend, on a unicycle you can always tilt the frame/fork whichever direction suits you best. I think back when Kris Holm raced the BCBR, he was actually gaining time on the technical sections where the bicycle riders were struggling.
@m1dg3t: I will agree with you in spirit, but I don't think those reviews are meant for the bike geniuses like MVDP...but the average rider? Sure people can wing down hills on 26er full rigid like they did 20 years ago, but the average rider wouldn't be confident doing so...relative to say a modern dh bike. Just my two cents
@m1dg3t: I mean I shouldn't bitch, the xc bike review pinkbike did this spring was pretty good...but when you have nonracers reviewing xc bikes that aren't fitted the way they are supposed to be you get less than ideal results. I read the reviews for a BMC agonist and the reviewer was complaining that the 73 degree sta was too slack and he had the seat pushed all the way forward...I pretty must stopped listening after that.
@Themissinglink83: Are you referring to the nonracer reviewer who has ridden XCO world cups, or the nonracer reviewer who has racked up high finishes in the BC Bike Race?
@Ginsu2000: you can look through the all the reviews of XC bikes on bikes and compare them to world cup bikes that pinkbike also photographed. If you know you know.
At the end of the day, there is a world of differences between riders of all levels. What you're used to and how you expect it to behave. Someone used to enduro type bikes would be able to ride that trail on that XC fully as well, but he/she needs time to come to terms with it. Because you need to be able to react intuitively. So you need to know exactly how front-rear balance is, how stable or agile it steers etc. Because you need to be able to pop right into the right position when you need to, you don't have time to "find" it. So if Mathieu would ride that same trail on a "slack" enduro bike he's never ridden before, he might actually be slower initially. Because he needs to learn and be confident with how it corners, jumps etc. And you may even need to tap into a certain mode. I usually ride my local pumptrack on my BMX. Steep angles, 20" wheels etc. It just takes a few minutes every time to get along with it and then I'm fine. Especially on the pumptrack as that's what I use it for. The other day I brought my mountainbike. 26" wheels, 63deg HA, 460mm reach etc. Aside from being a bit harder to accelerate, I mostly had to come to terms with the tight berms (this is no big Velosolutions track). I was just not cornering tight enough. I'm more than used to the bike but as I was on the pumptrack, my mind was in BMX mode. It just took time to get along with it on the mountainbike.
So yeah, you don't necessarily need a more skilled or more experienced reviewer to test XC race bikes. But you might need someone who consistently spends time on similar bikes and tries to go fast. But it is a tough call, isn't it. "Hey, do you want to ride these XC loops or do you want to come ride bikeparks and big natural terrain?" It takes a special somebody to make special decisions.
@chakaping: not really, maybe the initial ones, everyone gushes and wants to validate their expensive decision but I’m talking about the extensive feedback on those long threads you can find, you’ll uncover everything you need in those.
Yes, the guy is awesome... First tour in the TdF, wins 2 stages and has the yellow jersey for 6 days, then pulls out to rest/prep for the MTB XC race in the Olympics...
I liked how he picked and easily cleaned the more gnar tricky lines. If he ever gets bored of road bikes then a successful career in Downhill/Enduro awaits him.
quit the TDF right in them middle of it after putting on a show; winning a stage and holding the yellow jersey for a few more, just to focus on the MTB race in the Olympics. MVDPs a real one
They seem to haunt the recreational riding scene now. Due to their surging popularity our local trails become slightly more sanitized each time I ride them... a stone gone here, a corner cut there...
@pourquois-pas: Ugh, don't even get me started. We recently had a bunch of well-built features removed from our local trails and apparently the action was sparked by a complaint to the operating authority by a mountain biker who personally assessed it as too dangerous. For reference, this was all blue-trail level stuff by Ontario standards, which is borderline Green trail by BC standards. And every feature was completely rollable and/or bypassable.
@big-red: I've had the same complaints here by guys who build green trails and complain when someone takes out a root or a rock, then they come to my black/dbl black trails and want to modify the bypasses so they can handle the ride arounds (and have a chance at strava times). It doesn't even strike them as hypocritical.
Happening here too. I spend 20 minutes every other ride dragging logs and branches across the straight lines that are starting to appear everywhere. A lot of them are developing on flat bits of trail through deep leaf fall and other detritus, so I'm thinking it's mostly ebikes as it would be a real slog and far more effort than just sticking to the established trail on a normal bike. Trouble is these lines become the main line surprisingly quickly and the fun twisty stuff gets lost.
We've also had people reducing the size of some jumps, actually making them more dangerous as you're now much more likely to land flat now, rather than making it to the downslope that the jump was originally built for. The growth of MTB has it's downsides.
Hey! I posted this video in the comments last week in response to some dude who said MVDP couldn't ride. Maybe pinkbike should hire me as a content editor.
@SonofBovril: weird how people feel the need to defend celebrities so vehemently. I had an argument with a bloke at work this year about the Rock being on the juice, and Chris Hemsworth. I don’t care if they are, and they are. He just could not accept that there was any chance at all they would do that, even in the face of supporting evidence like the plus 10kg of muscle and minus 10% of fat in three months kind of stuff. Quite an interesting phenomenon actually. Same with Lance. People would scream bloody murder that he was clean!
FWIW I don't care if MVDP is on the PEDs. I think most people in the peloton are to be honest. Of course the ones that are on the PEDs lie and say they aren't, but those liars also make the clean ones seem guilty by association. I think for some, it's not a case of being clean, so much as a case of getting paid. Just don't get caught. Stay one step ahead of the testers. And like, why is caffeine legal when it's a performance enhancing substance? Water also enhances performance. Sleep does too, but it's not a substance.
Anyway MvdP my or may not be clean. I simply posed the question. No need to downvote me for that. I wasn't the only one thinking it.
@heckler999: pretty telling that he knocked the stone away with his front wheel instead of hopping it. Looks suspiciously like a man who can’t hop if you ask me.
Was it wheelies? Looked like a manual to me but hard to see from this angle. He was on a downslope and I suppose the bike wouldn't be so stable if he'd been pedaling.
This is clearly 80’s hair band style music. By the nineties we’d all moved on to grunge, alternative, and electronic dance music. Oh, and the Spice Girls, for reasons that were not really about the music…
@MB3: 80's? That's when thrash and death metal thrived (until halfway 90's). Wasn't this glam/hair stuff 70's? Surely not 60's, that was hippie stuff. 50's was rockabilly, 40's and 10's was world war (so probably only straight march music), 20's and 30's was crisis so music must have been sad and slow. So I'm pretty sure this was music from the 1900's. This is what the Wright Flyer flight data recorder has recorded.
XC courses should have far more technical optional lines than are currently the norm in order to heavily reward skilled riders. Currently, I feel like the sport is disproportionately about uphill climbing strength.
Your comment would have been correct several years ago, but to state that now means you aren’t paying attention.
These days you have to climb at an insane pace and have exceptional technical skill. World Cup XC bikes are moving to 120 front and rear fire ac reason.
@hllclmbr: Did you see the course preview for the last round? There was nothing there that would even remotely challenge Mathieu Van Der Poel, let alone some of the other skilled technical riders. I swear, it seems like the people defending the downhill technicality of current XC courses really don't ride much technical terrain themselves.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek0UsA9FkHU
More like the reviewer/tester lacking the skill/s to descend confidently. They need to push their agenda though - sell bikes.
tenor.com/es/ver/well-then-your-are-lost-you-are-lost-obi-wan-kenobi-starwars-gif-7897510
Either way...
Matthieu Van Der Poel: " Hold my Gatorade"
TL;DR: Don't only read the conclusion (and the comments section). Also compare how the reviewer rides to how you ride. And take a bike you've both ridden as the benchmark.
Anyway, MVDP is a f%cking beast.
Whatever haven’t to munis anyways?
There used to be a guy who would ride hard North Shore trails on one.
Either way, as for descending on a muni, front-rear balance is pretty good actually. It is never like you have too much grip with one wheel and too little with the other. Also, whereas a bicycle tilts forwards when you descend, on a unicycle you can always tilt the frame/fork whichever direction suits you best. I think back when Kris Holm raced the BCBR, he was actually gaining time on the technical sections where the bicycle riders were struggling.
facts. when i see sam pilgrim flaring kids bikes and suicide no handing walmart bikes at whistler, it makes me feel wholly inadequate
Pink bike peanut gallery: See, nobody needs an enduro bike!!!!!!
So yeah, you don't necessarily need a more skilled or more experienced reviewer to test XC race bikes. But you might need someone who consistently spends time on similar bikes and tries to go fast. But it is a tough call, isn't it. "Hey, do you want to ride these XC loops or do you want to come ride bikeparks and big natural terrain?" It takes a special somebody to make special decisions.
Anyway, lots of XC racers move to Kamloops and Vancouver Island to prepare for World Cup
I think for some, it's not a case of being clean, so much as a case of getting paid. Just don't get caught. Stay one step ahead of the testers.
And like, why is caffeine legal when it's a performance enhancing substance? Water also enhances performance. Sleep does too, but it's not a substance.
Anyway MvdP my or may not be clean. I simply posed the question. No need to downvote me for that. I wasn't the only one thinking it.
Caffeine become illegal at a some point! I don't remember the exact dosage but if you take too much caffeine your are positive to caffeine!
www.pinkbike.com/news/mathieu-van-der-poel-wins-the-second-stage-of-the-tour-de-france.html
www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7OuDeVbhxs
@ 0:31 and 0:38 for the slow motion.
You heard it here first
Based on what?
This is clearly 80’s hair band style music. By the nineties we’d all moved on to grunge, alternative, and electronic dance music. Oh, and the Spice Girls, for reasons that were not really about the music…
This is clearly 1890's post bellum romance/frontier hybrid. By the 1900s we'd all moved on to pre-revolutionary Marxist group-chant/Cossack Oktavism.
You must've been a nerd.
These days you have to climb at an insane pace and have exceptional technical skill. World Cup XC bikes are moving to 120 front and rear fire ac reason.
What happened to the edit function?
This morning, I climbed 4000’ in mud with lots of roots and limestone rocks, then descended the same silly slick trails.
You?