The next generation of the Wardens have arrived and we’re stoked to get them on the trails. Here’s a hit list of what’s new with the 27.5 Warden and why we hope it will be your next ride.
The Next Gen of Innovation Our new Warden features updated suspension kinematics, geometry, tubes and boasts new custom parts. It’s a 27.5 model that will become your all mountain enduro machine.
Patented Fourby4 Suspension - total confidence We fine-tuned the Warden’s Fourby4 technology so that you could pedal even better, while offering increased rear traction. Plus, we added more suspension for an even bigger ride.
157Trail- trail precision Building off the success of the Fugitive, we incorporated 157 hubs with 73mm BB shells on the new Warden. This wide rear end allows for DH stiffness for precise tracking while keeping a narrow Q-factor common with 73mm BB shells. Clever design keeps rider heel clearance only 1mm wider than our 142mm bikes and narrower than many boost 148mm options. Tire width and rim choices are endless, with clearance to run 2.8 tires on a super wide rim.
Progressive Geo Our patented offset seat-tube design was a first in the industry in 2004 and continues to be a hallmark of our brand. The design can accommodate a 180mm dropper post on a size small frame and a 210mm dropper on medium through XL frames.
A 77 degree seat tube angle optimizes pedaling efficiency and climbing position to attack any hill with ease, while the slack 64.5 degree head tube provides stability when descending. Knolly strikes a balance between climbing performance, fit, and ride handling with little to no sacrifice in any of them.
Increasing the reach to 500mm on a large while keeping the chainstays at a manageable 432mm provides a long wheelbase with a tight back end for a balanced, stable and agile ride. Additionally, our shorter head tube lengths allow riders more set up options when building their new dream bike. With a low stack height, the Warden is at home carving corners and climbing technical trails. Or add a few extra spacers under the stem if you prefer charging through steep chutes.
The Warden can be set up in neutral or slack. Slack mode doesn't just provide a slacker head angle, it also lowers the bottom bracket, increases the chainstay length, and creates a more progressive leverage curve. Changing your geometry is as simple as removing the lower shock bolt, sliding it forward or back, and re-installing it. Trail side adjustments made easy.
Knolly Materials/Parts- Uncompromised performance The Warden features 6066 hydroformed tubing to provide a greater strength to weight resistance over other commonly used alloys such as 6061. We also continue to include our CNC machined 6Al-4V titanium fasteners, threaded bottom bracket, easy to set up internal cable routing, and next generation Igus pivot bushing technology to increase service intervals. Our engineering first mentality provides total reliability and ultimate precision.
In addition, it comes ready for any chain guide, bash guard, or even front derailleur setup with removeable e-type and ISCG-05 mounts. The removable downtube protector allows for easily routed internal cables and provides a hidden mounting bracket inside the downtube for a Di2 drivetrain or spare derailleur hanger. Every size now comes with the ability to fit a full size water bottle with your favourite piggyback shock. The Warden is purpose built and spec’d with practical features so that you can maximize your every adventure.
The Warden- two great options The Warden replaces one of the most legendary bikes in our lineup with more travel, an improved pedaling platform, and streamlined aesthetics which ultimately delivers more fun on the trails. This version features a 160mm fork and 160mm shock, and begs you to get in a quick 5000 foot alpine climb before descending back down the hardest double black you can find.
The Warden LT is designed for all those riders who took our first gen Warden to the very edge of its ability and are questing for more. With a super-enduro type stance, the Warden LT is decked out with a 170mm fork and 168mm shock.
It took a while to get here but with the addition of the new Warden to our already successful Fugitive models, Knolly has sealed its position as the brand delivering the most fun and capable bikes to rowdy riders all over the globe.
Pricing and Give Back Program We recognize that things are changing right now and we want to do our part. With each new Warden frame or full bike that we sell online this spring, we’ll give $100 to the Vancouver Coastal Health hospital foundations.
The 2020 Warden ranges in price from $2270 to $2673 USD, complete bikes with the Dawn Patrol kit ranging from $4720 to $5350 US. It’s available NOW at your Knolly Bikes Dealer and online: www.knollybikes.com
@artistformlyknowasdan: that would be the most wild skibike ever. I sold my TNGNT last year and am considering doing something like that with an SX trail I found on FB marketplace
Ohhhhh you mean a stinky looks like a session? So you’re saying a Warden looks like a Stinky which in turn looks like a Session so basically you’re saying it looks like a Session? What you did there. . . I see it.
@KNOLLYBIKES: I know, a great bike for sure. Uninterrupted ST deserves more credit than it gets. You should also post some sus curves, lots of geeks here on PB. And I know that your sus is one of the best on the market.
@Ajorda: Only boost was stupid from its inception, and 157 is brilliant. The only reason 157 isn't on every mtb is because boost is in the way. Thanks Trek.
Rode my first Knolly in 2007. Tried many many bikes since then and keep coming back. Been a pleasure to see the brand grow and mature and get to where they are now.
The 2020 Warden I have been riding for the last year is absolutely the ultimate bike I have ever ridden.
With the confidence it inspires I have plunged into some new trails (Squamish / whistler / Pemberton) blind that I will likely think very seriously about before ever riding again. Damn awesome.
@knuckleheadmtb: Same for me! Well I wanted the raw at first but then went with the raw special edition Delirium but with Warden shock. It will arrive soon!!!
@Timo82: ohhh, that’s a great idea! Wish I had thought of that! But I went with black with the chrome decals and have a very sick black w/chrome decals motif going on... which will also be very sick.
Were you able to get the “Warden” sticker out on the top tube? Or will it still say Delirium?
@islandforlife: Yeah I wanted a raw frame so much but thought about the black/chrome decals and some silver/chrome components!! But I just bought my blue Hope E4 brakes last year so I want to keep them and will be better looking with the raw finish! I'll add some blue things and silver hubs/nipples. Yours will be sick too!!
Mmmm didn't ask them and don't think they would do it? lol The new warden is already a big bike for me so I'll look pretty dumb on a Delirium for a lot of bikers but then they'll think I am a f*cking beast climbing like this with a Delirium!! hahaha
Stop calling short chainstays that don't get bigger as the front end increases "balanced." It is the opposite. Also the red link is a weird asthetic choice.
The red link is for the brand followers. Having had a Chilcotin I would never buy Knolly again if: a.) shock mounting bolt would remain 6mm and b.) this red link part would not be redesigned to be stiffer. So this is a message: "we know we have f*ed up previous designs, but look, now it is perfectly ok!". If you think I am just a stupid troll - I actually owned a Chilco, sold it and yesterday the new owner have broken the very link. Bending a few of those 6mm bolts before. I mean, I am still a stupid troll, but actually have something true to say about Knolly But otherwise Chilco was a fantastic bike, so this Warden is probably awesome.
Balanced was the word we used because it was used to describe our bike by Bike mag during their annual bike shoot out. There is A LOT more to making a bike balanced than a single measurement. I see you are in Squamish, we'd love to bring you a demo bike when Covid19 restrictions are over so you can experiance our balanced ride.
73mm BB? Great! 157mm hubs? Would never even consider it, just stupid.
Beef up the frame and pivots instead of making the rear end wider and giving you less clearance. If a Specialized Demo can win a DH World Championship on a135mm hub a Knolly trail bike will be just fine with 148.
The specialized dh bike had a short cassette body for dh use, and wider flanges for better wheel durability and lateral stiffness. Ss huba comonly have ftc of 35 on both sides for flange width of 70mm - strong wheel.
trail bikes needs a full cassette. 148 limits flange width to about 63mm or so with ftc 39 24 imbalanced and less than ideal but better than 142 spacing.
150/157 conventional hubs with full cassette body often enoough have 70mm flange width like ftc 39/31, which is laterally stiffer more balanced tension more durable.
Numerous bikes over years have had 150/157 hub with 73bb it works great. Chainline is good, you can change chainline at ring or bb to tend towards inside or middle depending where u pedal most (most ppl pedal bottom few gears most so inboard chainline makes most sense)
You seem to be one of those people who talks out their ass. Good luck.
157 spacing does allow you build beefy pivots and links, which is what they did. Most people don’t understand that’s why companies go this route. Sure it allows for a stronger wheel but the real benefit it the insanely stiff rear end. Enduro bikes are basically DH bikes these days so why shouldn’t they benefit from the same build technology. I rode and raced a 157 rear end last year and won’t go back.
@DoubleCrownAddict you missed the part where the bike industry moved from 142mm to a useless 148mm standard to help them sell PLUS sized tire bikes (which didn't take off the way the planned). Knolly , Pivot , Devinci etc called bullshit and moved to a wide hub spacing which actually delivered on what the industry claimed boost 148mm would accomplish. I believe that the 157 trail spacing will outlive boost 148. But even if it doesn't , boost 148 is still dumb.
@getsomesy: No, I simply don't like change for the sake of marketing, which is all that you regurgitated. Hitting your derailleur on rocks or other obstacles isn't great, and people who tell you they can tell a difference are just saying that justifying their purchase or is Knolly fan. They are a good company but this is completely unnecessary.
Anybody who thinks a trail bike needs a 157mm hub is the person talking out of their sales marketing ass and blowing smoke up everybody else's.
@DoubleCrownAddict: Anybody who doesn’t ride it is talking out their ass. Knolly isn’t a company that relies on bullshit marketing. They are engineering first. Function over form. Which is why they skipped 148 which wasn’t an improvement over 142. 157 however is a huge improvement. It’s why DH bikes are built with it. If you can’t or don’t see the benefit, then maybe you aren’t riding hard enough. For those that do and have ridden it, the difference is obvious.
Knolly builds bikes to last years and years. 157 is a hub width that has been around for a long time. Knolly never built a 148, they went from 142 to 157. 148 is already slowly going away on trail bikes amongst the smaller manufacturers. When 148 came out, a lot of people asked why not 157?
@DGWW: Then they should go back to 142, beef up the stays and pivots, and market the reasons why. I already hit my heels too much with 148, makes no sense to go wider if it it negatively affects your ability to maneuver on the bike and increases the chances of damaging your rear derailleur.
148 is a good width for e bikes since you need a little more width for the motor. Most e bike manufacturers are using 148 as their standard so expect it to become the standard as e bikes continue to take over snail bikes in sales.
@DoubleCrownAddict: Where your heels are, their design is only 1mm wider on each side than their 142 design, and narrower than a lot of others 148 designs. So, not an issue.
@islandforlife: Wider hubs also mean wider bottom bracket, which means more space for tire clearance with short stays. You can't fit 2.6in 27.5 tires on a 160mm bike with 432mm chainstays using a non-boost BB. I think this is a big factor that is not often discussed.
@mtb-sf: This. 157Trail means you can choose if you want to run a 27.5 x 2.8 tire on the bike. We don't expect many people will but why prevent people from doing this if we can make a bike that can handle any size you want.
157Trail on a 29'er also means you could run a 2.6 or meatier tire with manageable chain stay length.
A hub I can use on both my trail bike and DH rig... now that makes sense. 148 is joke. Major hassle for next to no gain. My Knolly performs better than any other bike I've ever owned and if I didn't like what I ride now so much I'd buy the Warden in a second. And by the way, those videos of buffed out kid trails don't do what a Knolly can handle justice - well, maybe the last video. Oh yeah, nothing looks better than a raw Knolly.
@mutton: They actually haven't but that's an irrelevant point anyways.
I also don't care of its only 1 mm wider, I don't want it any wider and I don't want to increase the chances of hitting the rear derailleur on something.
A narrow rear hub equals a faster bike. You have more room to maneuver your feet around, especially if you are using flat pedals. Your feet won't be hitting the stays as much, which only slows down your pedaling efforts. Also slightly more aerodynamic, which anybody who has ever lost a downhill race by less than a second might appreciate.
I haven't tried a Knolly and have no intention of trying one since they don't make e bikes. But if I was a pigeon toed snail bike rider I might give them a look, I do appreciate their support for trail builders.
I rode and raced and full 8 race enduro season on a Fugivtive LT last season with the same 157 rear end. Never hit my heels or legs on anything, never felt limited in my body movements.
I was much faster on this bike simply because the rear end is so still it tracked so much better through the really rough chunk it gave me the confidence to haul ass through everything.
I sold that bike in the fall and began demoing bike to figure what I wanted to be on next... what would I be the fastest on. Tried a SC Hightower, Norco Range, Rocky Instinct BC Edition, and had a SC Megatower for 3 days. All bikes were great, especially the Megatower but none could match the stiffness and confidence inspiring ride of the 157 rear end. Even on the Megatower I feel the rear end moving in comparison to the Knolly... this caused the bike the move around more under me through really high speed chunk forcing me to slow down to stay in control. Simply it was easier to ride faster on the Knolly.
After those demos, my mind was made up, I needed to be on a 157 rear end again. I’ll be this Warden.
For me, after actually testing multiple bikes on my home trails that I know well, and putting them all including a Knolly to test, the Knolly cane out on top.
It also wasn’t just the stiff 157 rear end, the 4x4 suspension system was on another level compared to the other bikes I tested. Where most suspension systems have to compromise some aspect I order to work well in another, the Knolly system seems to do it all well. The Bik mag review puts in words really well and I encourage you to read that review and watch the review video as it captures much of what I felt in comparison to other bikes.
Anyway, that’s my two cents, take care and what ever you ride, enjoy it!!
@thegoodflow: He decided he doesn't like 157 based on absolutely nothing, and he's gonna use any baseless speculation to support that opinion. Also rides the mtb version of the mobility scooter. America in a nutshell.
@DoubleCrownAddict: its not marketing yah doinker. Its basic engineering principals.
It may not be neccisary for a feckless wimp or lightwieght gentle rider, but for someone going big or hard wheels with little spoke bracing most cerainly can be a weak link in the structural integry of the bike.
I have broken lots of derraileurs, and when im not careful do hit them charging tight rough lines. But were only talking about moving the dereailleur outboard 7.5mm from 135/142 hubs to 150mm and only 4.5mm further out than 148mm to 150/157mm. my pedal peotrudes much more than my derreiluer and it is uncommon to me to turn so tightly to trail my derrailuer into something my fork bottom pedal or crank wouldnt have hit anyway. On the other hand there is a substabcial and constantly noticable increase in wheel stiffness by increasing the drive side flange width 14%
Even if you are hitting things with your dereailuer i think it is more the fault of an antique vunerable gear shifting system rather than that of the performance and durability improving increased hub width.
@KNOLLYBIKES: its not 157trail its 157. You didnt invent it and it is so lame of to try to capture the name of a common prexisting hub dimention with your own branding. Very specialized of you.
@DoubleCrownAddict: I ride with my feet straighg for-aft. I am not a knolly fan but i have ridden them and other 150/157 spaced bikes without clipping my feet and i wear size 46 shoes. It sounds like you are duck toed!
@Off-my-lawn-hippie: Dirt bike trails suck, it's just not as much fun. Also barely anywhere to ride them in many areas and then all the licensing and registration if you wanted a dual sport. They are more fun to go uphill than down, wtf? I have no desire to own one since I heard Steve Smith died on one, don't even want to know what happened. R.i.p. chainsaw
Are you participating in the liberate protests? Was that you calling the nurses who were counter protesting abortion doctors?
@getsomesy: Knolly (and pivot) looked at the standards that already existed, and used 2 already existing standards to create something better than what was previously available. It's the best kind of progress, and they absolutely deserve credit for ignoring the wave of Trek's 148 stupidity to push this. This is the sort of iterative innovation that's good for us riders. Chill.
@getsomesy: i didn't say they did. But it doesn't matter. They're one of the few brands that ignored 148 when it was stupid and fashionable, and i admire them fore that.
@scottzg: "Knolly (and pivot) looked at the standards that already existed, and used 2 already existing standards to create something better than what was previously available."
@DGWW: the only thing that currently sucks about 157mm is the limited hubs/wheelset generally available in the marketplace. I own a Devinci Troy 29er, but not much out there for decent-priced wheelsets, yet.
@elshadow: is building a wheel set out of the budget ? I’d put money into a good hub and have it for years, I do hope more brands get behind it, and ensure its future.
@getsomesy: More durable or stiffer compared to what standard or need? I can see the reasoning behind 157 for 29er; for 27.5, not really. Also, them trying to make a point about wheel stiffness then spec'ing 28 spoke wheels undercuts their whole argument.
@kittenjuice: I've looked into it, and the wider chainline allows the tire to be closer to the bb. BUT, and this is a big but, why do you want short chainstays on a 160mm bike? I want the stability from stays that are not that short. So I just buy other bikes.
@JohanG: chainstay length is complicated. If you're designing the frame you can tweak the front triangle to be stable with any chainstay length. Also chainstay length can vary subjectively depending on axle path and how the suspension is tuned. And how you set up your cockpit will influence how the rear end feels.
A really savvy designer can create the ~same riding experience without changing chainstay length. Or at least scaling up/down chainstay length isn't that important compared to other design factors.
I don't care how long you like your rear-center, just realize what you feel is a consequence of the whole bike's set up.
If 157 is better for 29, it's better for 27. 157 uses the available space better. That's the whole story.
@JohanG: The 157 allows for people to choose a wider flanged hub to build a stiffer wheel if they want. It's about giving our customers options and the best chance to build the exact wheel they need without limiting options.
Good observation on the spec. We love the Industry Nine wheels and believe that their 28h wheels are fantastic for most people but also recognize that this is not for you if you are 260LBS and riding in the bike park all day. The 32h Spank Oozy 345's have been available on our Fugitive LT builds since releasing the bike but we weren't able to get the new Hex hubs from Spank in time to offer these wheels on the first shipment of Wardens. We are excited to offer them mid-summer when we get them in stock.
We can give kittenjuice some credit here for answering your question about why and how stability happens.
I have owned a few carbon bikes, but there are a few new Al frames that are calling to me, this bike being the loudest! I can’t wait to see one in person.
Currently on the Carbon Warden and like it, but goddamn the alloy was fun. Definitely going to sell it to snag a new alloy frame. Knolly for life after riding everything else.
Went from a carbon Warden to an early release of the 2020 Warden. No need to ride carbon again. This was instantly so superior. DH wheels. Cush core. Etc. Absolutely awesome.
@mutton: Do you find your’s bobs a lot while pedalling? I’m a big dude and find that it bobs like a bitch, but the tradeoff is still worth it, it’s that good. Recently started running a dhx2 and have found that the bobbing has gotten worse.
@Chrisgus: hey dude Not really. I alternate between the climb switch on / off. I use it only on super smooth roads but honestly if the road or trail is remotely loose / rough I take the climb switch off and allow try suspension to get me through.
I have worked on my pedaling technique - using my core and pedaling in circles and am continually amazed at what I have cleaned on this bike. Take the time to dial the suspensions settings in and it pedals super well. It's been my only bike for 12+ months and I do big 3-4k days from home.
Saying that it's not an xc bike. I have also been riding a steel hard tail recently and appreciate the dramatic differences between each bike.
I would have zero doubt choosing the Warden V2 as my only bike on a road trip. I ride the steepest double black / red trails I can find and I pedal / push to get there.
the Reverb kills it for me at that price for a complete build. But, Knolly is still one of those "must demo" bikes for me. Would love to try out an Endorphrin. Did the 2020 Endorphrin get the bigger bolts?
No Knolly bikes around here, but got the opportunity to try one a couple of years back in the US and was impressed by it! Composed, pedaling traction, efficient while climbing and silent when going down. Would love to see a 29er with a bit more travel @KNOLLYBIKES !!
Felt so natural about 10 seconds into my second ride. 5'9" on a medium. I feel I have more real estate within which I can move. Like...I am not riding on the top of a triangle (smaller area) - but lower down closer to the base (larger and more stable). It's a weird analogy - but I can move around more and have a more subtle influence on the bike.
I cleaned climbs last summer that I have never nailed before - and I can only think it was because the extra reach allowed more leverage but also more subtle transfers of weight / balance. I picture the same effect on the DH
I have had 2 Wardens and 1 Delirium, Loved all of them...........upgraded to a Fugitive and the thing is insane can’t wait for my new Delirium to show up.
Thank you @KNOLLYBIKES! I can't wait to get mine in the mail... err.. I mean shipped to my LBS in Campbell and spruced up for an amazing delivery. Oh boy!
The model years usually go off the tax year, not solar years. It's why you see "2020" models in 2019 and so on. In Canada and the US the tax season does not line up with the solar year. In Australia the tax year starts in July.
It doesn't allow us to work with it in the same way a 6000 series alloy allows. We can hydroform, control wall thicknesses, and taper tubes into the shapes with 6066 that can't be done with 7000 series.
@KNOLLYBIKES: cool, and I love hydroforming , can we play a hypothetical game, let’s say in an alternate universe you could do all that with the 7000 series, would you guys still choose 6000? And in this alternate universe there are no negative affects, just anything you can do with 6000, you can do to 7000, and keep the positive attributes, ps. I love metals
Super nerd answer here (as concisely as I can make it
A lot of people think that because the number "7xxx" is higher than "6xxx" it must be better. The difference is the primary alloying ingredient in the material. 7xxx alloys have a way less complicated heat treating process than 6xxx alloys including only a very simple artificial aging process. 6xxx alloys require a much more difficult solution quench process before their artificial aging process.
Now, some 7xxx alloys like 7050 and 7075 are incredibly strong and ideal for parts like cranks, stems, bars, linkage bits, high end fork parts, etc... But they are NOT weldable and their formability is somewhat restricted (yes, I know that there are developments in welding 7075 but its formability is still not great meaning very simple round tube shapes due to retaining significantly high strength in its annealed state). There is one alloy: 7005 that IS weldable and it was designed for bike frame tubing not because it's strong / better, but because it was EASIER than welding 6xxx alloys due to the lack of requirement of a solution quench process. It was popular in the late 1999s and early 2000s.
But 7005 has generally fallen out of favour for high end bikes over the past decade. It has stress corrosion cracking issues and modern 6xxx alloys such as 6066 are just better in every way. Not only are they significantly stronger than "aircraft grade" 6061, they are far more tough as well. You can kind of think that "strength = weight" and that "tough = reliability". It's not quite that direct but it's close.
So, for now and most likely the foreseeable future, 6066 is pretty much king for high end alloy frames. And not only is it strong and tough, it has excellent formability, corrosion resistance, machinability, and weldability. We're even seeing it being used in non-welded forged parts now which was previously the domain of 7075.
Depends... lots of hub makers also make changeable end caps that will allow you to run your 148 wheels. You won’t get the benefit of wider hub flanges making a stronger wheel but the 157 spacing benefits go much further that just a strong wheel. Shock load protection, beefy links and pivots make for an intensely stiff and burly rear end that is very noticeable.
@islandforlife: you actually do get most of the benefit though if you run the adapters with a boost hub. There's more to be gained from the improved dish and the more balanced spoke tensions, than there is from the wider flanges.
@thegoodflow: which is basically what the 150mm hubs used on DH bikes for a decade or so have been. Same flange width as 148, same axle spacing as 157, just dished better.
@cueTIP: Yep, I've got a 157 DT 240s DH hub on my fugitive. It's actually a little narrower spacing than the boost hubs, but it has tall symmetrical flanges and builds a dishless wheel so it more than makes up for that. Better bracing angle on the driveside and better tension on the nds, than boost, or superboost for that matter actually.
I like it but the sizing seems a bit weird. I've never seen a bike brand call a 610mm top tube a size small. I wonder what height riders they recommend for these.
@mutton: Reach makes sense, but top-tube length affects pedalling position while seated! That's kind of a non-negotiable geometry number in my books. I have a small-sized Pole Evolink 140 with 450mm of reach, but it has a 580mm top tube. 600mm+ and I start needing to slam the saddle forwards.
@KxPop: ja Bru I am no engineer but love the new geo. Our riding here in the pnw involves a lot of tech climbing. I have been able to clean climbs on this bike that I have never done before. I use my dropper post a lot and out the saddle for most tech moves. The greater reach / top tube seems to allow me to swing / pull the front end around super easy (tight switch backs) or allows bigger margin of error when transferring weight for / aft.
I have built two steep techy climbing trails (whistler xc style) and relish riding them on the v2. I can literally preload my suspension and pedal through the gnarliest sections of roots with subtle hip movement's. Traction is unlike anything I have experienced.
Each person had their preferences based on body type and riding style. ????????
500 and 660 top tube in large? Now it is time to downsize ) in general awesome bike, i do not like 157 rear spacing, since it is make no sense to me as customer, since most wheelsets on the market are boost
157 was on the market on DH bikes about 5 years before 148. Yes, most wheels are boost but if we made bikes to be the same as everybody else, the new Warden would just be another Session.
@KNOLLYBIKES: yes you can buy rear 157 (or custom build) and front 110x15, however majority of the wheel sets are trails specific(boost) or dh specific;
The point is not about how good or bad standard or how long it is on the market, it is about adoption and unification front and rear
@nickmalysh: ok, I am so over hearing people whine about the 157 hub. If it's too inconvenient for you, then it's just not the bike for you. Move along and ride something else
How about pricing in Canadian dollars? WTF. Once you do exchange rate? There are a lot of options out there. I for one will never buy a Nolly because of this.
They are a very small company (in comparison) that sells bikes all around the world and it’s probably just easier for all their customers to leave pricing in USD. It quite easy to factor in exchange or just give them a call and talk to them about pricing, they’ll answer the phone and chat all day about engineering and features as well as give you the prices in Canadian dollars. There are a lot of options at these prices, but very few, if any, making very high end aluminum frames with such an intense focus on quality and detail. You get what you pay for. You should call them up, see if you can get on a demo.
@islandforlife: It is quite easy to factor exchange rates that fluctuate all the time. We could be looking at a 60 cent dollar we could be looking at a dollar on par. Don't care really... It is quite easy to be charged extra to switch USD to CDN. It is about billing and it is about a Canadian company selling bikes manufactured overseas and then sold in a foreign currency. I'll take my Taiwanese built bikes from any number of other Canadian manufacturers and sold in Canadian dollars. Screw Knolly.
@freakonomics: haha, chill buddy, if you talk to them, they do their pricing in Canadian first, then covert to USD. When you buy a bike from them they don’t charge you a price based on Canadian pricing, changed to usd then converted back to CDN. Man, call them up, have a chat, ask them these questions yourself and they’ll give you very real and honest answers. They are super nice people who are very proud of being a Canadian company, working with one of the best frame makers in Taiwan. Telling these people to screw the selves when you have zero knowledge of what you’re talking about or if who these people are is actually disgusting. Get some real info, talk to some real people and the forms proper informed opinion. Take care!
@freakonomics Every review & release put onto Pinkbike is in USD. I just double checked Rocky's and Norco's most recent reviews to confirm this. Pinkbike is also Canadian based but understands that the largest market visiting their website from the USA, this release is no different. If you were to head to our website, you would see that we've posted pricing in USD and CAD.
We are still a Canadian company and proud of it. Anybody in Canada who gives us a shout about a bike from within Canada, gets a Canadian dollar price. You actually end up about $0.04 per dollar ahead as of today's exchange rate, 2020-04-26. I'm sorry you think we are a bunch of goons here but the customer, is making out better than us.
@femto505: i wont be caught dead on a bike with 43_ chainstays unless its a slopestyle/dj bike
@thegoodflow yeah ive ridden a bike with similar hta reach and cs, it sucked. Also after over 20 yrs riding pretty sure i can assess charcteristics on #'s.
@getsomesy: ok, cool. Well I stand corrected. Also riding 20+ years and own an XL fugitive. 500 reach, 430 stays. I couldn't care less if you want to call it "balanced", but it f*cking rips. Super agaile and rails corners. But, you'd know better because you assessed the numbers.
@islandforlife: @islandforlife: Do you work for Knolly? Or just a superfan? I mean it's fine, just an impressive level of promotion you're cranking out, this being the third time you've pasted that review link under this article!
@Skooks: Ya, to be clear I have nothing against Knolly and I get the "fan for life" thing, I've been on Transition for years. But to be fair, I don't know how anyone could verify that claim as fact! Just have to chuckle when someone is so voracious with the reviews and what not.
I'm 5'9" and currently building my own frame, ended up at 475mm reach which ist the same as this, so yes, progressive but not overly long. Ride one before you judge it by its numbers.
Seriously though, this bike looks sick. I've got a few buddies who were waiting on the 2020 model to buy one. Hope it sells well!
Ohhhhh you mean a stinky looks like a session? So you’re saying a Warden looks like a Stinky which in turn looks like a Session so basically you’re saying it looks like a Session?
What you did there. . . I see it.
Boost is the dumbest thing around. Best to just tear that bandaid off and get rid of it.
The 2020 Warden I have been riding for the last year is absolutely the ultimate bike I have ever ridden.
With the confidence it inspires I have plunged into some new trails (Squamish / whistler / Pemberton) blind that I will likely think very seriously about before ever riding again. Damn awesome.
Were you able to get the “Warden” sticker out on the top tube? Or will it still say Delirium?
Mmmm didn't ask them and don't think they would do it? lol The new warden is already a big bike for me so I'll look pretty dumb on a Delirium for a lot of bikers but then they'll think I am a f*cking beast climbing like this with a Delirium!! hahaha
So this is a message: "we know we have f*ed up previous designs, but look, now it is perfectly ok!".
If you think I am just a stupid troll - I actually owned a Chilco, sold it and yesterday the new owner have broken the very link. Bending a few of those 6mm bolts before. I mean, I am still a stupid troll, but actually have something true to say about Knolly
But otherwise Chilco was a fantastic bike, so this Warden is probably awesome.
157mm hubs? Would never even consider it, just stupid.
Beef up the frame and pivots instead of making the rear end wider and giving you less clearance. If a Specialized Demo can win a DH World Championship on a135mm hub a Knolly trail bike will be just fine with 148.
trail bikes needs a full cassette. 148 limits flange width to about 63mm or so with ftc 39 24 imbalanced and less than ideal but better than 142 spacing.
150/157 conventional hubs with full cassette body often enoough have 70mm flange width like ftc 39/31, which is laterally stiffer more balanced tension more durable.
Numerous bikes over years have had 150/157 hub with 73bb it works great. Chainline is good, you can change chainline at ring or bb to tend towards inside or middle depending where u pedal most (most ppl pedal bottom few gears most so inboard chainline makes most sense)
You seem to be one of those people who talks out their ass. Good luck.
Anybody who thinks a trail bike needs a 157mm hub is the person talking out of their sales marketing ass and blowing smoke up everybody else's.
148 is a good width for e bikes since you need a little more width for the motor. Most e bike manufacturers are using 148 as their standard so expect it to become the standard as e bikes continue to take over snail bikes in sales.
You can see it here if you scroll down - www.knollybikes.com/engineering
157Trail on a 29'er also means you could run a 2.6 or meatier tire with manageable chain stay length.
Engineering first. And whiskey, a close second.
I also don't care of its only 1 mm wider, I don't want it any wider and I don't want to increase the chances of hitting the rear derailleur on something.
A narrow rear hub equals a faster bike. You have more room to maneuver your feet around, especially if you are using flat pedals. Your feet won't be hitting the stays as much, which only slows down your pedaling efforts. Also slightly more aerodynamic, which anybody who has ever lost a downhill race by less than a second might appreciate.
I haven't tried a Knolly and have no intention of trying one since they don't make e bikes. But if I was a pigeon toed snail bike rider I might give them a look, I do appreciate their support for trail builders.
Again, it’s only 1mm wider than their 142 design,
I rode and raced and full 8 race enduro season on a Fugivtive LT last season with the same 157 rear end. Never hit my heels or legs on anything, never felt limited in my body movements.
I was much faster on this bike simply because the rear end is so still it tracked so much better through the really rough chunk it gave me the confidence to haul ass through everything.
I sold that bike in the fall and began demoing bike to figure what I wanted to be on next... what would I be the fastest on. Tried a SC Hightower, Norco Range, Rocky Instinct BC Edition, and had a SC Megatower for 3 days. All bikes were great, especially the Megatower but none could match the stiffness and confidence inspiring ride of the 157 rear end. Even on the Megatower I feel the rear end moving in comparison to the Knolly... this caused the bike the move around more under me through really high speed chunk forcing me to slow down to stay in control. Simply it was easier to ride faster on the Knolly.
After those demos, my mind was made up, I needed to be on a 157 rear end again. I’ll be this Warden.
For me, after actually testing multiple bikes on my home trails that I know well, and putting them all including a Knolly to test, the Knolly cane out on top.
It also wasn’t just the stiff 157 rear end, the 4x4 suspension system was on another level compared to the other bikes I tested. Where most suspension systems have to compromise some aspect I order to work well in another, the Knolly system seems to do it all well. The Bik mag review puts in words really well and I encourage you to read that review and watch the review video as it captures much of what I felt in comparison to other bikes.
Anyway, that’s my two cents, take care and what ever you ride, enjoy it!!
(in metaphorical use) any person or thing that moves exceedingly slowly.
"a tedious and complicated process enough to exasperate a snail"
Enjoy pedaling your snail bike and I will enjoy pedaling faster on my e bike. Have a nice slooow ride up, peace.
It may not be neccisary for a feckless wimp or lightwieght gentle rider, but for someone going big or hard wheels with little spoke bracing most cerainly can be a weak link in the structural integry of the bike.
I have broken lots of derraileurs, and when im not careful do hit them charging tight rough lines. But were only talking about moving the dereailleur outboard 7.5mm from 135/142 hubs to 150mm and only 4.5mm further out than 148mm to 150/157mm. my pedal peotrudes much more than my derreiluer and it is uncommon to me to turn so tightly to trail my derrailuer into something my fork bottom pedal or crank wouldnt have hit anyway. On the other hand there is a substabcial and constantly noticable increase in wheel stiffness by increasing the drive side flange width 14%
Even if you are hitting things with your dereailuer i think it is more the fault of an antique vunerable gear shifting system rather than that of the performance and durability improving increased hub width.
I ride with my feet straighg for-aft. I am not a knolly fan but i have ridden them and other 150/157 spaced bikes without clipping my feet and i wear size 46 shoes. It sounds like you are duck toed!
Are you participating in the liberate protests? Was that you calling the nurses who were counter protesting abortion doctors?
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-protests-lockdown-operation-gridlock-nurses-masks-arizona-a9483466.html
A really savvy designer can create the ~same riding experience without changing chainstay length. Or at least scaling up/down chainstay length isn't that important compared to other design factors.
I don't care how long you like your rear-center, just realize what you feel is a consequence of the whole bike's set up.
If 157 is better for 29, it's better for 27. 157 uses the available space better. That's the whole story.
Good observation on the spec. We love the Industry Nine wheels and believe that their 28h wheels are fantastic for most people but also recognize that this is not for you if you are 260LBS and riding in the bike park all day. The 32h Spank Oozy 345's have been available on our Fugitive LT builds since releasing the bike but we weren't able to get the new Hex hubs from Spank in time to offer these wheels on the first shipment of Wardens. We are excited to offer them mid-summer when we get them in stock.
We can give kittenjuice some credit here for answering your question about why and how stability happens.
Not really. I alternate between the climb switch on / off. I use it only on super smooth roads but honestly if the road or trail is remotely loose / rough I take the climb switch off and allow try suspension to get me through.
I have worked on my pedaling technique - using my core and pedaling in circles and am continually amazed at what I have cleaned on this bike. Take the time to dial the suspensions settings in and it pedals super well. It's been my only bike for 12+ months and I do big 3-4k days from home.
Saying that it's not an xc bike. I have also been riding a steel hard tail recently and appreciate the dramatic differences between each bike.
I would have zero doubt choosing the Warden V2 as my only bike on a road trip. I ride the steepest double black / red trails I can find and I pedal / push to get there.
Can’t afford one anymore, but would buy one if I could.
I cleaned climbs last summer that I have never nailed before - and I can only think it was because the extra reach allowed more leverage but also more subtle transfers of weight / balance. I picture the same effect on the DH
Hell. I don't know. It works.
I've got the Still Creek Murder but with a Warden shock! It's nice to know that you'll probably never see the same bike that you have!
Sweet looking bike.
Super nerd answer here (as concisely as I can make it
A lot of people think that because the number "7xxx" is higher than "6xxx" it must be better. The difference is the primary alloying ingredient in the material. 7xxx alloys have a way less complicated heat treating process than 6xxx alloys including only a very simple artificial aging process. 6xxx alloys require a much more difficult solution quench process before their artificial aging process.
Now, some 7xxx alloys like 7050 and 7075 are incredibly strong and ideal for parts like cranks, stems, bars, linkage bits, high end fork parts, etc... But they are NOT weldable and their formability is somewhat restricted (yes, I know that there are developments in welding 7075 but its formability is still not great meaning very simple round tube shapes due to retaining significantly high strength in its annealed state). There is one alloy: 7005 that IS weldable and it was designed for bike frame tubing not because it's strong / better, but because it was EASIER than welding 6xxx alloys due to the lack of requirement of a solution quench process. It was popular in the late 1999s and early 2000s.
But 7005 has generally fallen out of favour for high end bikes over the past decade. It has stress corrosion cracking issues and modern 6xxx alloys such as 6066 are just better in every way. Not only are they significantly stronger than "aircraft grade" 6061, they are far more tough as well. You can kind of think that "strength = weight" and that "tough = reliability". It's not quite that direct but it's close.
So, for now and most likely the foreseeable future, 6066 is pretty much king for high end alloy frames. And not only is it strong and tough, it has excellent formability, corrosion resistance, machinability, and weldability. We're even seeing it being used in non-welded forged parts now which was previously the domain of 7075.
Hope that helps!
I will never go back. So natural and such a bigger cockpit to move around in.
I am researching hard tails right now and looking at even longer reach.
I am no engineer but love the new geo. Our riding here in the pnw involves a lot of tech climbing. I have been able to clean climbs on this bike that I have never done before. I use my dropper post a lot and out the saddle for most tech moves. The greater reach / top tube seems to allow me to swing / pull the front end around super easy (tight switch backs) or allows bigger margin of error when transferring weight for / aft.
I have built two steep techy climbing trails (whistler xc style) and relish riding them on the v2. I can literally preload my suspension and pedal through the gnarliest sections of roots with subtle hip movement's. Traction is unlike anything I have experienced.
Each person had their preferences based on body type and riding style.
????????
I am a Safrican in the USA. Come visit.
The point is not about how good or bad standard or how long it is on the market, it is about adoption and unification front and rear
We are still a Canadian company and proud of it. Anybody in Canada who gives us a shout about a bike from within Canada, gets a Canadian dollar price. You actually end up about $0.04 per dollar ahead as of today's exchange rate, 2020-04-26. I'm sorry you think we are a bunch of goons here but the customer, is making out better than us.
@thegoodflow yeah ive ridden a bike with similar hta reach and cs, it sucked. Also after over 20 yrs riding pretty sure i can assess charcteristics on #'s.
Knolly - this thing looks hot!