PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
YT Capra Core 1
Words by Mike Kazimer; photography by Tom RichardsThis isn't the first time the YT Capra has been included a Pinkbike Field Test – the carbon framed, 29” wheel version made an appearance back in 2021. This time around, we went with the mixed wheel, aluminum model that offers an even better value, with a price tag of $2,699 USD. And if that's still too steep, it's currently on sale for $2,299 USD.
We set a price cap for this Value Field Test, but we didn't set any limits on travel. That gave us the freedom to include bikes like the Capra Core 1, which YT says “has “everything your average enduro ripper needs and nothing they don’t.” I'd say that statement isn't far off, and it could serve as an excellent entry point for riders looking to venture into more technical terrain, and maybe even line up for a race or two.
Capra MX Core 1 Details• Travel: 170mm / 170mm fork
• Mixed wheels
• 64° head angle
• 77.4° seat angle
• 433mm chainstays
• Reach: 464mm (L)
• Sizes: S, M, L, XL, XXL
• Weight: 36.6 lb / 16.6 kg
• Price: $2,699 USD
• More info:
yt-industries.com The Capra MX has 170mm of travel that's delivered by a RockShox Zeb Base fork and SuperDeluxe Select R shock. SRAM's mineral-oil filled DB8 brakes help keeps speeds in check, and shifting duties are taken care of by SRAM's 12-speed NX drivetrain. A Sun Ringle Duro aluminum wheelset is mounted up with a Maxxis Assegai / DHR II tire combo.
We stuck the Capra it in the low geometry position and kept it there for the duration of testing, which gives it a 64-degree head angle, 77.4-degree seat angle, and 433mm chainstay length. Our size large test bike had a 464mm reach, the shortest on test. For riders interested in sizing up, it's worth keeping an eye on the seat tube length. While the 445mm length on the size L is fairly typical, bumping up to a size XL results in a 470mm length, which could make running a longer dropper post a difficult, if not impossible task depending on a rider's height.
ClimbingAlong with having the most travel in our group of test bikes, the Capra also has the most weight, checking in at 36.6 pounds. That's with EXO casing tires too, so it'll bump up a bit if you decide to go with burlier rubber to match the bike's capabilities. That said, the weight does fade into the background fairly quickly, and as long as you didn't hop off a lighter bike immediately before heading out on the Capra it doesn't feel overly portly.
As far as efficiency goes, I'd put the Capra in the middle of the road. It doesn't dip too deeply into its travel unless you're standing up out of the saddle and really mashing on the pedals, and even then it's far from a wallowy mess. There's no climb switch on the shock, so there's no way to firm it up for extended fire road grinds, but that also means there's no danger of forgetting to open up the shock before you drop into a descent. If it did have a climb switch I probably would have reached for it on smoother climbs, but I wouldn't say it's a necessity.
The Capra has more of a compact seated climbing position, thanks to the steep seat tube angle and shorter reach, which adds in a level of maneuverability that's not always associated with a 170mm bikes. Sure, its handling isn't as quick and snappy as something like the 130mm GT Sensor, but it's also less of a handful than the Specialized Status was on more rolling, meandering trails.
Descending The Capra could be an attractive antidote for riders who feel that modern bikes have gotten too long and slack, or for newcomers who want to feel like they're telling the bike where to go rather than the other way around.
It's an easy bike to jump and whip through turns, and it tracked well in flat corners, providing a more balanced ride than the Status, which has a fairly long, slack front end paired with very short chainstays. Between the two bike, if I was going to pick one of them for an enduro race I'd go with the Capra – it's more of an all-rounder than the Status, and its middle of the road geometry mean there's a wide range of terrain where it feels right at home.
The shorter dimensions do become noticeable in steeper trails or at higher speeds, where it can feel like you're perched above the wheels rather than in between them. There's a little less room for error when faced with obstacles like steep, sequential drop-offs, but it's really only on the steepest, roughest trails where that trait became apparent. The fork Zeb Base fork may have played a role here – it wanted to sit fairly deep in its travel, while the shock ramped up fairly quickly, which meant it was a little tricky to find an ideal balance between the two.
ComponentsThe SRAM DB8 brakes worked very well, especially considering the overall price of this model. Often times lower priced brakes also deliver a much lower level of performance, but the DB8's were quiet and consistent. They do feel a little less powerful than their Code siblings, something that switching to SRAM's newer, thicker HS2 rotors would likely help with.
The main fly in the ointment when it comes to the Capra's component spec ended up being the NX drivetrain, specifically the shifter. The internal ratchet mechanism stripped out, rendering it useless and unable to shift after only a few rides. It's something that would be covered under warranty, and maybe it was just a fluke, but overall the longevity of the NX and SX drivetrains hasn't been impressive.
Who's It For?This would be a great bike for someone that wants something with plenty of travel for rougher trails, but also doesn't want to feel like they're lugging around a downhill bike. It'll handle trips to the bike park or the occasional enduro race just as easily as a casual after-work pedal, and overall the price-to-performance ratio makes it a very attractive option.
It's a tool, and sometimes it can be useful. Why were the editors so strongly against bikes that "needed" a climb switch (but would invariably have good descending feel)
In the real world, does it actually matter? not so much. will gladly reach for the switch even if its just a short climb. That said, I do tend to forget to switch back to party mode from time to time. also not a big deal. I just stop or slow down and flip the switch.
Tires.
Shock.
Fork.
Shifter.
Derailleur.
Rotors
I have an enduro bike that many reviewers say "don't need" a climb switch. I still toggle mine on for most climbs and its no trouble to do so.
Guess I should explain. So...the primary goal of the $2600 mixed wheel/enduro rig is to get guys out on the trails knowing they can hit the bike park. AND that they can mod the bike as they progress.
It's got a full top/bottom bash guide, so obviously park is the #1 use.
Well, for park, you're dumping those tires in a week first time you glass over rocks. The NX shifter/derailleur are crapping the bed immediately if my experience (and posters all over) is an indication.
The rotors are gonna cook in the park, so substandard for that.
Last, the fork & rear shock are not "tuneable" internally or "upgradeable" that I know of. Meaning you can't keep them & buy better internals like Avalanche, PUSH, etc. I could be wrong about that part. But the fork & shock...you'd have to sell them right off the bike to make the very expensive upgrade of better damping.
You're not selling Rebound only suspension on the secondary market and buying even a decent fully tuneable set of boingers for (wild guess) less than 4 times what you sell the used base model.
To me, when I look at this bike I see "Monster truck travel. Race geometry. Park weight." so parts & bike makers need to do a tree branch style chart of "upgrades" for a model like this.
"Internal upgrade options include...."
"Hub internal upgrades include..."
"Braking performance tune enhancements include..."
Before you buy it. See links on screen of the tuning options you'll have to upgrade without selling off the parts/components & associated prices.
I know everything is disposable now, but a simplification of the upgrade process using the existing bits makes more sense to me than "upgrades include..buy all new stuff to replace it"
Also again mate you don't need avalanche quality suspension to start riding park. The tires can handle park easily. Rougher trails? Maybe not for 80kg+ riders but I use exo tires when I want a faster rolling tire and they work fine.
Also the aftermarket doesn't care about how many dials you have but the fancy sticker. Kids know shit. I remember how little I got for my avy carted boxxer. Next to nothing and it was on sale for a looooong time.
Am I defending the bike because it's the bike I own? Yes. But also objectively, none of these are "immediate" issues. I (like many others who will probably buy this bike) wanted a bike I can bash and thrash out of the box, without worrying. And it has provided exactly that.
For reference my local hills are highland, thunder, and killington. .
Of course the fork and shock are internally tuneable.
You could also drop a charger RC2 damper into that fork pretty easily.
check his comment from last month saying he's accrued a lot of time off which he's taking
My problem with it is that they've made perfectly adequate low/mid range cassettes for years, but they made those couple of changes on this one seemingly to differentiate it as shittier.
What seemed like a giant (my first 27.5er) Super Enduro rig then is now my tiny Park and DS race ripper.
Why? A $12k build with this much travel….will weigh about the same.
Sure, a MegaPlower will be better, but not 3x the price better.
If people are shredding EXO maybe weight is the factor. Or line choice?
"While the 445mm length on the size L is fairly typical, bumping up to a size XL results in a 470mm length, which could make running a longer dropper post a difficult, if not impossible task depending on a rider's height."
at 6ft i ride a large with 470 reach and its awesome, Ridden bigger and its a barge, more stretched out and takes considerably more body effort to get it to move.
Most of the bike industry is infact moving its sizing down a bit now ie size large reaches are actually dropping back a bit as we've seen on several new bikes.
Long reach became a thing because of short wheelbase/short cs with aggressive head angles.
Now with longer rear centres/centers and alot of brands starting to steepen their HTA again we are saying reach being relaxed to a good spot.
On long travel rigs, long reach is more of a hinderance than a help, it just pushes your weight more forward for the steep stuff. DH bikes are in general shorter for this reason.
Geo for the most part is practically the same for most Trail->Enduro so to me the most important focus is building a cohesive suspension, with a driveline and braking that is reliable.
Personally, I think the ABP/Maestro/Split pivot is the best all-arounder for suspension design, but DW does an even better job for speed. Then when it comes to the horst/4-bar, I think that there are no longer excuses with the ability for a manufacturer to dial in the tune with Fox/Rockshox
When it comes to components... Shimano has it in the bag. You get the same performance out of any of their 4 pot brakes and shifters from Deore>...
IMO - the current champ is the Divinci Chainshaw, this one should be on the list.
I'm looking for shorter cranks in hopes to offset.
According to YT
"WEIGHT 16,6 KG - 36,6 LBS
Average weight for smallest size available, without tubes, pedals, and bottle"
Henry brought the donuts today, didnt he?
Awesome field test review. Looking forward to the rest.
I am 6 feet / 1.83 meters tall and I ride an XL-sized Capra with a OneUp dropper seatpost with 200mm of travel. So frame size is clearly not an issue. You should choose the size based on your riding style and aspirations.
Because I have been just delivered XL (mullet mx versiob) and would probably return it and reorder L size.
I am 184 cm 84,5 cm inseam and fully extended dropper (original postman) is probably almost too high for me (even its lowest as ot can be on seattube) and in lowest position it feels in the way for leaning the bike compared to my Trance X 29 200mm One Up dropper.
Also the reach seems to big and generous, even after some tests with 35mm stem.
No way I feel I can throw this thing around on jumps :/
Yay.
And yay to the bike industry for continuing to spec low end SRAM stuff they know sucks.
#YTrash