Starling Cycles, the small British manufacturer known for their elegantly simple steel full-suspension frames, have added another model to their lineup – the Twist. It's a mixed wheel size bike, with a 29” wheel up front, a 27.5” wheel out back, and 160mm of rear travel.
The Reynolds 853 frame is an international affair – the front triangle is made in Bristol, UK, while the swingarm is manufatured by ORA Engineering in Taiwan. There's room for up to a 2.8” rear tire, which also means there's loads of mud clearance when running something narrower. The grey / black color combination shown is the stock paint scheme, but a range of options are available for an additional charge, everything from candy red to duck egg blue.
Starling Twist Details• Travel: 160mm (rear) / custom short travel options available
• Reynolds 853 steel frame
• Wheel size: 29" (f) / 27.5" (r)
• Head Angle: 65°
• Seat Tube Angle: 77°
• Chainstay Length: 437mm
• Sizes: M, L, XL
• Price: $£1770 frame only w/out shock
•
www.starlingcycles.com The Twist was designed to have 160mm of travel, but it's possible to reduce that number all the way down to 115mm by running a shorter length shock. Starling also have an adjustable shock mount that allows the bottom bracket height and head angle to be fine tuned depending on rider preference.
MSRP for the Twist frame is £1770 without a rear shock, and full builds starting from £3300. Keep in mind that there's no VAT on sales outside the EU.
Photos: Starling Cycles
Just have to be patient...
Fit is fit. The (no doubt thoughtful and no doubt knowledgeable) folks responsible for this frame design have taken into account sizing this bike to a wide enough swath of the market to sell it.
Wrong.
For a short person any attempt to do a switchback on this thing is a no go.
They need to be honest and just say: This bike is not for Small riders .
It’s a small business not a social enterprise, I am sure if the market was there they would make one, but I maintain the fact that plenty of size small options exist/
Bikes are available for all riders sizes, it's just that I don't think the bigger 29" wheels work as well for smaller riders.
The Starling seat tubes aren't long at all, 375mm on a small Swoop, is that too long?
Also, forget about reach as an ergonomic measurement, it's much less important than effective top top as to whether a bike will fit you. Read all about it here:
www.starlingcycles.com/starling-cycles-sizing-guide
By a unicycle
Believe me, it works.
I’m 5’10” and run 460mm on a medium Yeti.
Got plenty of folks on small Mondrakers (450 reach) around these parts who are less than 5’6” and they shred switchbacks like its their job.
One of our local descents is 8km, 1,000meters of down and nearly 70 switchbacks.
Just because you can’t make that bike sing and dance doesn’t mean other people can’t. Besides, you’ve never ridden that bike, how’d you have any clue what’s possible on it?
Have a good day.
Either way, it is nice to be able to put these two brands side to side.
All the answers here!
Starling have released a video based in their workshop and in it the rear triangle looks far more substantial than it appears in the pics above.
- Wheelbase ranges from 1218mm to 1288mm and you keep the same chainstay length? Not good! You put a lot of emphasis on bike geometry, so you should stand by your words and use different lengths on the different Frame sizes
- Where's the weight? Can't find any info here or on your Website...
One day I'll do custom chainstays, but it's a little way off...
Frame weight is about 3.6kg. But this has to be taken into account with my rant that weight doesn't really matter. Wheel weight matters, but frame weight much less so. A top end carbon frame might be 1kg lighter than one of my frames. But if you consider bike plus rider system, this is typically only 1% of the total. Two tenths of f*&k all!
But yes, I do need to add to website.
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/starling-twist-2020
- Starling Cycles
This is cynical to the max.
The only point of a mullet is to freshen up a dated 29er. Slacken it and lower it for cheap. If you're buying a new bike, buy one that is designed to be a good bike from ground up for wheel size it is.
Its not like this frame is $600
If you watch any of the interviews with Joe McEwan he’s an engineer, not big on fads really. His bikes have been long and slack for longer than most and I would be very surprised if this is an old 29er frame.
He’s also got form for producing bikes that are very niche, it’s hard to see his single speed, high pivot downhill bike as opportunism; he very clearly just made a bike he wanted to ride.
I suspect he tested a few mullet bikes and/or had customers asking for custom ones and so launched it as a model in its own right.