Known primarily for their aftermarket pads and rotors, it appears the Spanish brand Galfer is now working on a full brake system. They teased the project at Milan's EICMA motorcycle exhibition earlier this month, with a fairly polished product on display in their booth. We've now gotten some additional shots of the working prototypes, which look to be fitted with some data acquisition equipment.
The pencil-straight lever looks interesting, but we love the aesthetics of the master cylinder that's aligned with the bar. The piggyback-style master piston is reminiscent of Formula's Cura design, and appears to allow for the attachment of the data measurement systems. The on-bike levers look to be using SRAM’s Matchmaker clamp hardware; it feels safe to assume that won't make it into production, but we'd absolutely love to see compatibility with Matchmaker or another existing standard.
Asked for comment, Galfer said:
| For now, at EICMA we showed a prototype brake that is in the development step and its initial results are very promising. It includes improvements in functionality, design, and performance. More information will be available at Eurobike 2024. |
The wired device connected to the master cylinder is an AiM Brake Pressure sensor, which simply provides accurate readings on oil pressure within a given system. This is a fairly typical step for any brake development, and hopefully means things are being tested under a critical lens.
That's all for now, but it seems likely that there will be a new player in the brake game soon enough. We'll stay tuned!
e.g. if I get weird on trail and smash my knee into my controls from below, I’m fine with my dropper or shift lever moving a bit, I can deal with that. But I wouldn’t want my brake lever rotating upward along with the other control.
Modify the leaver every time I got a new one.
You can prefer separate clamps for your stuff, you dont need to have wild justifications for it, its cool man.
Youre wrong, and Im not sure I ever want to talk to you again, but youre allowed to have your own opinions
You can literally have/enjoy the things you like without having to justify any of them. Your reasoning can literally be, "I like multiple clamps cause thats how I like em" And thats cool.
Funny that you felt the need to let me know youre a mechanic and instructor....me too, I just couldnt figure out a way to work it into this exchange, now I have, spectacular!
PB seems to be under the impression that everything needs to have a well thought out reason that youll die over, the whole rest of the world doesnt give two shits, so none of us should either...
Again, youre totally wrong, cause matchmaker is definitely the way, but its all cool man (imagine this with some sarcasm)
Only mentioned my experience so I might not come across as an holier-than-thou keyboard warrior who spews BS with no real-world experience or forethought. Not necessary to bring up, that's acceptable.
No reason to lump me in with PB in general. I hardly ever comment or wade in. I just had the spare time today, I guess. I guess I'm just having a hard time wrapping my head around how me saying "oh wow, some people like thing X, but I like thing Y, and this is why I happen to prefer thing Y" is somehow pathological or not worth sharing with people who are engaging in a conversation about it.
To your own point... if the rest of the world doesn't give two shits about any of this stuff, and there's no reason to care about what's said here, why are you so hellbent on nitpicking about how I or other talk about it?
Hell, maybe you've just been trolling all along. In which case, happy we got to waste some time together!
I think justification, and reasoning are essentially the same thing, no?
The whole point of lumping you, or anyone in as pinkers is to make a sweeping generalization, in reality, we all have our own opinions, some correct, some ridiculous, some down right wrong (your presumption for multiple clamps being one of them )
I will, out of sheer morbid curiousity ask what are your several reasons for disliking matchmaker clamps, or similar
Call it justification, call it reasoning, call it whatever. I just don’t get your idea that if I were to talk about my preferred spoke lacing pattern and spoke tension (just to use a non-cockpit example) in the middle of a dialogue about building wheels, it’s better for me to only say “I like 3-cross/2-cross lacing and 1150N”, rather than to engage with others on WHY I prefer those things.
Just seemed a silly thing to seem to suggest considering how much you seem to wade into technical conversations on here and give your own two cents on why one thing is better than another.
As for cockpit stuff? The “wild scenario” about my knees hitting my controls has happened several times in the past during race runs, so I decided that it mattered to me how I set things up. I’ve also crashed hard enough for a control to snap entirely off the bar—so I figured it’s better to have one single thing come off the bar rather than two (i.e. brake lever AND shifter all at once). I’m obviously an over-tinkerer and over-thinker about bike setup, and sometimes I like to try different positions for one control without affecting any of the others, especially while I’m out riding and having fun with settings. If I had MMX, I’d have to use a tool to achieve that. With separate clamps, I can use my hands since my torque is, again, always low enough that I can rotate things with a bit of force. I travel a lot and concern myself with compatibility or availability of parts overseas, and if I break something I’d rather have more ways of reattaching shit to my bar than fewer—speaking from experience here. I have so many random spare clamps at home that there’s no reason to spend extra $$ (as little as it may be) on mixed clamps that do nothing for me, aesthetically or otherwise. Lastly, I run Hayes brakes, and their Peacemaker clamp provides a pretty lame range of adjustment for shift/drop levers.
As noted previously, you are welcome to expand on all your opinions as much as youd like, I was hopefully just trying to let you know that you dont need any sort of justification/reasoning for enjoying the things you do, regardless of what the greater PB commenter section would have you, or anyone else believe.
I do tend to weigh in a far too much with technical non-sense, and am usually met with such hateful/ignorant reasoning's that it in turn has me push on a little too much, and prolly come off as a bit of a di*k. (one gentlemen was so furious at the thought of being skilled on clipless pedals was on par with skill on flats that he was reduced to a whirlwind of insults and rage, over pedals!)
However this time, you've provided sound reasons for your ingrained opinions, and I very much appreciate that, so Thank You for that (again, I think youre dead wrong, and I friggin love MatchMaker comparability, but youre only wrong for me)
Its interesting to think that some of the reasons you choose seperate clamps, are the reasons I choose matchmaker. I prefer to carry less, both on my bike, and in my pockets, and less is well, less, less to go wrong, less weight, just....less
I travel with my bike too, and prefer less things to go wrong, and match maker is readily avaliable pretty well everywhere.
I find lots of clamps are either over engineered or vastly under engineered, while matchmaker is pretty dialed.
My only wish is that the XX1 ability to adjust thumb lever position on their shifter was available in GX, cause im not interested in paying that premium for that extra adjustability
If you ever find yourself in Canadas beautiful BC region, look me up, lets go for a ride, beers on me
If youre trying to get my attention, maybe try an approach thats a little more interesting, I really engage with people who present some technical knowledge/passion, so telling me youre "an engineer" is one way.....
Also, sometimes I try a bit too hard to be right, so you could try a really firm stance on why integrated bar/stems are absolute trash, and dont allow you to change things that youll never change anyway. I guess that same argument could be made for most things.
Let me know if you need any other pointers
As a side note, this is entirely sarcasm, just in case you didnt pick that up. Its not a judgement on you personally.......Nah, it might be a little, but harmless really
Totally agree that nobody owes anyone else an explanation for why they prefer X, Y or Z. It sure can be fun to talk about though, especially if there’s some fun banter that (hopefully) doesn’t devolve into a total dumpster fire.
My final thought on bike setup… I’ve always said that my favorite parts on a bike are those that feel invisible. Those that work so well and so seamlessly that I can kinda forget they’re there. Those that are trustworthy or durable enough that I can ride without the nagging feeling that something might fail. Or just those that I’m so accustomed to that, even if imperfect in some sense, give me peace of mind. My guess is that, even if not superstitious or paranoid, most riders have a much better time on their bike and can ride harder when they can let the bike do its thing without any worries.
100% agree, GX would be WAY cooler if that thumb lever were adjustable. Sram could make that happen in an inexpensive way if they really wanted to.
I do make it up over the border a few times a year, would be fun to ride and figure out once and for all who’s totally wrong and who’s totally right!
p.s. my best riding buddy and I spend about 75% of our riding time together absolutely shitting on the other’s setup and component choices — idk why I get such a kick out of it.
I've had some friends/colleagues in the past that were almost psychotic about being millimetre perfect about setups. Theres a really good chance I took it upon myself to illustrate to them that they were in fact worrying about nothing, when I'd change things on their bikes without them really noticing. Bike shop days, good times
I feel the same way about most people and their unwillingness to try new setups, but will go and buy a new bike and be happy as a clam....
I usually completely reset anything adjustable on my bike in the off season, and work on getting things dialed again during the spring. I usually come close to the previous setup, but things change, sometimes for the better, sometimes just different.
Come ride in the Okanagan, great mix of terrain, but mostly very little grip, and plenty of tech. Loads of good wineries, and even better breweries.
I sometimes even mess with myself to try to get over my constant tinkering. I’ll turn a knob back and forth a few clicks enough times that I lose count of where I started… and then when I ride I manage to have a hard time feeling a difference. Just goes to prove that equipment and settings is hardly the full picture.
Sounds like a pretty sweet area. It’s on my list. Made it up to Sun Peaks for the first time this year. Closing weekend was a hoot. Keen to ride singletrack in that part of BC.
Come ride Bellingham sometime too — surprisingly wide variety between the trails on the mainland and the islands.
Bellingham, it was on my list this year to get back there, but Squamish was too good to resist. I'm a bit of a Transition fanboy, so I've been down a couple times to ride some of the trails, had an absolute blast.
I was scheduled to help out our coaching team in Bellingham, but our numbers were down, and they didnt need me.
even just saying Chuckanuts is a good time....
That's my 5cents worth.
But like you elude to, it was always a gamble every spring on that first ride after the winter if one of the levers would work or not. Having to bleed then all the time was a bummer too, even if it was easy.
The wondering bite point was a booking but could be dealt with. Something that really sucked, was if you wore the pads down too much, there was a tendency for the lever to pull to the bar at complete random; and usually when you needed it.
Said goodbye to all of that this year and switched over to Hayes Dominions. No complaints yet. Even after wearing the pads down almost all the way, they still felt great when trying to stop my fatass.
Codes have been wonderful for me. But I would like to move up to something like Hayes next time I need brakes.
>The wondering bite point was a booking but could be dealt with. Something that really sucked, was if you wore the pads down too much, there was a tendency for the lever to pull to the bar at complete random; and usually when you needed
This is a not an issue. Just run Redline Likewater instead of the OEM mineral oil. Cheaper or same price and better performance overall, except when you spill it and you can't see where to clean.
I have SLX brakes and they are not troublefree to say the least. Bleeding once a month, mysterious contaminated pads, steep and rough hills result nearly instant in that famous wondering brake point (yes I can bleed a brake). They do grab stronglly and do the job. But upgrading to XT or XTR seams a stupid move because they are the same design.
I was looking @ Hope or formula brakes, but I'm in doubt that those are a real upgrade, besides just being more exepnsive. What is you're take on it?
I have another set with trp evo caliper and the lever pull starts close to the bar, but 2 pumps after the lever is where is suposed to be. Every time. Consistently wandering bite point.
Youre telling me, that youd put your bike away for the winter, then take it back out in Spring without bleeding your brakes?
Thats like a 4-6 month hiatus and you dont bleed your brakes prior to heading out?
do you also not replace cables, check bearings, service shocks and forks?
Absolute heathens!
and Shimano brakes are so affordable, i try to sell my Shimano brakes every 1-2 years and buy a brand new set. It's usually the same, or cheaper than trying buy parts to "maintain" other brands of brakes.
That being said, I have yet to try a brake that is better. TRP DHR EVOs feel about the same, as do Hayes Dominions... not worth the $$ to upgrade just yet imho.
especially with the differences in temps, even wile sitting in a closed system, condensation can form, which contaminates the system, so its always a good idea.
Willing to bet you waste more time on PB, and your phone than it takes to re-bleed your brakes in the Spring....so thats a silly argument
However I don’t want to see that MC orientation normalized across others brands as time goes on, so I don’t mind hearing others bemoan its drawbacks as well.
Come to think about it that is great when you are in the middle of nowhere and need a little snack.
Galfer : hold my beer
What I didn't like is the newer 4 pot puts the bleed nipple on the low side of the caliper on the front brake, which is ok for a full drain gravity bleed, but any bubbles want to climb back into the caliper.
No idea what you're referring to. What makes Shimano's bleed nipple any different from anyone else's?
I've been bleeding Shimano brakes for over ten years without a "nipple issue".
It works for me.
I dont understand why most dont have it.
Makes anything more easy.
Ahh, no.
I've been bleeding brakes since hydraulic brakes became a thing. I owned a bike shop for 5 years and am mechanic certified by Barnett's Bicycle Institute.
There isn't a shop mechanic in the world that will agree with you. Neither will Shimano.
Shimano's bottom up bleed is the easiest bleed system ever created. Simply push all the fluid from the bottom up into the catch cup until it's air-free. Easy peasy.
Your system goes against the laws of gravity and physics. You know, that stuff where air rises in liquid and pressure makes it even more so?
Brake fluid just dripping down without pressure will not force air out when the air "wants" to travel up. It also won't dislodge bubbles that are in the caliper or MC. It will just slide past, leaving the bubble in place.
"most brakes don't have any... "
What?
Here’s a more detailed explanation so you know for next time.
youtu.be/piWBVDh1pTE?si=WjAfrLoVYKTpk3fe
If you push the fluid from the top with the syringe down and open the bleed nippel, what is the difference?
Reading is an ability you seem to be deficient in. I said I owned a bike shop. I also said I was trained/certified as a mechanic by the top bicycle repair institute in the country.
I have also been trained at Shimano in their brakes. Being the designer/manufacturer, they might know a thing or two about them.
You are wrong. Sorry, it happens.
Any bike shop tech would be fired for using your approach. Well, at least corrected and then fired if he did it again. First off, it takes an easy ten minute job and turns it into what, a half hour or so for everything to slowly drain through? Second, it will waste a ton of fluid. Third, it does nothing to dislodge air bubbles. Forth, it's simply unnecessary. Shimano bleeds are so simple and work so perfectly that a blind monkey could do one.
If you can't get a good Shimano bleed with the method they recommend, you bring the word inept to new heights. God help you if you ever encounter Sram or Avids.
You are correct about one thing only. The Shimano bleed kit is a joke, but it's cheap. There are lots of good quality bleed kits that also use the CORRECT method.
Don't get me wrong, that method will probably work OK, it's just far more time consuming, wastes fluid, is messy as hell, but mainly, it's completely unnecessary given the ease and quality of the correct method.
In what universe?
I have NEVER encountered a brake that didn't have bleed nipples. Every brake in Shimano's lineup comes with bleed nipples.
The level of misinformation on this sight is truly off the charts.
Gotta love it when common idiots think they know more than the professionals who design and work on this stuff every day.
I assume, since your method is far more of a PITA, that you must have had poor results with the recommended system.
Seriously, if the Shimano bleed method is beyond your ability, you really should be paying someone to work on your bike. Hell you should probably be paying someone to pedal your bike.
But you're the expert, right? LOL!
At least with a bike you can only hurt yourself. Hopefully you don't work on your car's brakes.
Impressive.
I guess you must be correct. A person agrees with you.
I'm done. You can't fix stupid.
I said I ownED a shop. You know, like in past tense. I closed it because my wife and I were sick of working 50-60 hr weeks.
I am currently an engineer at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Perhaps you've heard of it or do you need a link?
Like I said before; one person on one team. Still impressed.
Ps it works with all brakes too not just Shimano just pull the plunger out of the Syringe and use it like a bleed cup.
I moved from Chicago in 2013 to open it and closed it in 2018 when the lease was up. I then took a job at the lab ( www.lanl.gov ) to make three times the money for a four day workweek. I now have time to ride and ski, which was why we moved out west in the first place.
As for you, I apologize. I should have just ignored you from the beginning but 5 years of bike shop ownership has made me a little sick of untrained, self proclaimed experts who think they know better than actual trained professionals who do this every day. It was far easier to just laugh and ignore people like you before the internet gave you a voice. A loud voice.
As for bleeding brakes, will your technique work? Sure.
Is it the best way to do it. Shimano, almost all professional techs, and myself would say no.
But hey knock yourself out. It's your bike.
Anyway, good luck to you in whatever you do.
Keep working on those reading skills. 3rd grade is coming.
I applaud their efforts to bring a new brake to market.
I can remember when TRP started making high end brakes, I still ride TRP.