While we know it isn't for everyone, we're huge fans of the SRAM AXS groupset. Mountain biking's first wireless groupset may cost as much as some bikes, but it's a great option for those who can afford it, and we now see it on every SRAM sponsored riders' bike at the EWS.
The groupset was first released in February 2019, and while we've seen
some prototypes of other versions, it looks like it might be about to get its first real update. We spotted this new paddle on the bike of Iago Garay, but it has also made its way onto plenty of other pro's bikes this weekend in Finale Ligure and it look totally revised from the current AXS version.
The old paddle was pentagon shaped and designed to be easy to reach for any hand shape. This new paddle looks to be more similar in shape to a conventional shifter with a long, thin profile. It looks like the ergonomics have been worked on too, and this narrower shape should conform around the shape of an outstretched thumb a bit better. We also notice that it has been given a more textured surface for better grip in wet conditions.
The rest of the shifter body looks to be unchanged.
We have reached out to SRAM for further details and will update you if they give us any more information.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ythrdCsOFJU
Also I'm an idiot in setting up drive trains. With AXS it's idiot proof.
And the amount of people saying “oh it’s okay you get used to it” just cuz they want to be 100% behind their purchase.
That finger is only for braking. If you don’t know what that fingers for.
You don’t know what fingers are for.
And you could be way better at biking if you fingered it out.
I know you can shift with your finger.
But what would be even better is if the shifter paddles were where your thumb wants to be. Pretty simple that you want to separate your shifting and braking digits.
Because I’m trying to talk about where your shifter and brake controls should be.
And you’re trying to talk about how I’m a troll.
I understand how the shifter works in its entirety. Shifts great. Poor ergonomics.
So congratulations on your ability to be happy with mediocre.
Myself I am not and I’ve had my junk all over your shifters.
I did found out, I do not like the stock default shift settings. Good thing the app allow you switch which direction you want to shift up and down. I also disabled the one-click multi-shift.
Very tempting to get a 2nd set for the other bike.....
Good thing it’s only bike parts or you’d be a real problem.
The good part about the upgrade is that it is a $1 part which takes 30 seconds to change. Please someone could 3D print one on their own if Sram tries to overcharge for it.
While I prefer Shimano mechanical shifters - the eagle shifters are really good!
Cheaters everywhere man!
Second one lasted 56 minutes, I took a rock under the der, in a very normal way, it snapped off a $0.01 clip that holds the pivots together and rendered it the useless. 56 minutes. A one penny part. SRAM told me to throw it out and that it cannot be fixed. I asked for some help, a Discount in a crash replacement, and they said nope. 56 minutes. Way to stand behind your most expensive gear SRAM.
So like most SRAM products the stuff looks nice and works brand new, but then you are hosed over time. Stick with Shimano and avoid waisting money on SRAM crap. #notAdentist
Do you expect your car dealer to hand you a new car if you crash it first day?
It really sucks. Big time. I totally agree. But come on.
I love my AXS components, but I'm not looking forward to chaging out a dinged derailleur. Jumping on board, I know it's part of the game.
so SRAM, Shimano: make stuff that can be repaired! also goes for other components btw
It is what it is. See if the advantages it has are advantages for you personally. And see if the downsides are dealbreakers for you. Personally I think it is a disappointment that Di2 didn't make it into the latest Shimano MTB drivetrains. Even though I wouldn't necessarily go out and buy one right away, I view "wireless" as the main difference between the two competitors (would Di2 be available for modern wide range Shimano). And except for world cup mechanics who rebuild the bikes every few weeks and for people obsessed with "clean cockpit", I don't see the appeal of replacing wires with extra batteries and antennas.
Having said that, the price of wear parts is a big factor for me on choosing what I'd buy. For now I'd happily stick with 10sp, only replacing the sprockets that start skipping when I change my chain. You can buy individual sprockets for 10sp Shimano cassettes. You can do that with 11sp too so I might upgrade at some point if I need the extended range (and I don't want the HG500 cassette). But you can't do that with 12sp (as far as I know) so the prospect of replacing a complete cassette in a single go puts me off.
So, if I read this correctly. Saint from 2005 is the shit and 10s is also the shit. And you haven’t ridden 12s but it sucks because 10s is good?
Interesting.
Also, I love the I smashed the shit out of something and now the manufacturers won’t replace it argument. You could total a car pulling out of the dealer lot and tough, you own it. It you had the change to buy it the first time maybe that should have been a thought about replacement. Haters gunna hate.
Just like AXS, Shimano Saint 2004 to 2006 rear mechs needed something to perform the derived function of protecting the rear mech against these sideways impacts. Performing a derived function isn't necessarily bad and often essential for the main function to be performed. But having a component do that doesn't necessarily make it better than the alternative product that doesn't necessarily need to have the derived function to be performed. In this case, the 2007 Saint rear mech didn't need the protection simply because it wasn't rapid rise. Now AXS does need it and has it so that is all good. But they marketed it such as if it was a cool feature that other products were lacking, whereas in reality they simply just didn't need it. Not saying it was wrong of SRAM to mention it as it is true and all. But I get that people may have interpreted it as "it protects itself so it is better at surviving impact than the alternative product that doesn't". That may be where the disappointment from the OP stems from.
As for the number of gears then. I merely said I like to be able to replace individual worn sprockets. 10sp allows me to do that, 11sp too. I haven't seen individual (or small clusters) of 12sp sprockets for sale so that's what is putting me off. Would 12sp ride better, shift better under load and all? I honestly can't tell, haven't ridden it. But even if it works better (which it likely does) I wouldn't put it on my bike simply as I'm unwilling to deal with the added costs of replacing wear parts.
If again you can't read this correctly, I give up.
Nah man, I read it again. I read, rapid surprise is moar shimz and most gerdest. sRaM sayz axs moves rocks outta trail and no brakey expensif shifty thingy.
Any arguments about a product that you have zero ride time on invalidates anything you have to say about it.
I’m still cringing over here that someone would replace individual cogs is a cassette. Moar Shimz is the answer to all. And did you see shimano introduced Deore 12 speed?
I can’t resist though