The DetailsThe all-new frame mirrors the lines of the Bronson and Santa Cruz's other longer travel machines that use their lower-link VPP suspension layout. Compare this fresh, fourth-gen Tallboy to the version that came before it and it's easy to see that the two look nothing alike. Gone is the old toptube-mounted shock and classic dual-triangle look, replaced with a low-slung Fox damper and lines that are ready for action, probably because it resembles their heavier hitting bikes like the Megatower.
My test bike got the slightly lighter CC carbon frame (left). There's 10mm of chainstay length adjustment (right) via chips at the dropout. You'll need to use a different brake adapter, though, but at least it comes with the bike.
And speaking of the Megatower, the Tallboy uses similar inserts at the axle to let riders pick a chainstay length of either 430mm or 440mm. I had planned on ranting about how such adjustments only add complication and cost while only serving as another bullet point on the sales floor, but Santa Cruz does have a sound-ish angle for the feature: If you want to run 2.6" wide rubber with decent clearance, you'll want to put it in the longer setting... Which should also be the only setting.
The change requires a different brake mount to be used (they both come with the bike), the non-drive-side chip to be flipped after loosening a micro-sized set-screw that holds it in place, and the different drive-side chip/derailleur hanger to be installed. This one is likely a set-and-forget for most of us.
A flip-chip at the lower shock mount lets you adjust the geometry by the smallest amounts. It's a tuning tool that isn't made to vastly change the bike's performance.
But wait, there's still more flipping to be done, this time down at the lower shock mount where a chip offers either a 'HI' or 'LO' setting. Am I high for thinking that the majority of us would automatically default to the latter, even if we didn't know the geometry it provides? That'd probably be me, to be honest, and that's the setting that the bike spent the most time in; it provides a 65.5-degree head angle, a 76.2-degree seat angle, and 41mm of drop at the bottom bracket that's 332mm high.
Turn the chip around and you'll get head and seat angles that are literally just 0.2-degrees steeper, otherwise known as basically nothing. There are big changes at the bottom bracket, however, with 3mm of height added. Jokes aside, the idea with these adjustments isn't to drastically alter the bike's character, of course, but just as a modest tuning option. You might want to go LO to compensate for your 2.6" wide tires or if you over-over-forked the bike, for example. Or not, but you have the ability.
It's 2019 and tubes molded into the frame for internal routing (left) is the only way that internal routing should be done, just like on the Tallboy. The stock chainstay protector is ribbed for not just your pleasure, but others as well; no one wants to listen to you jangle your way through rock gardens.
Santa Cruz really does have their frames well sorted; you can fit a giant water bottle inside the front triangle, the bottom bracket shell has threads in it, and internally-molded tubes mean that you push a line in through one hole and it comes out the opposite end like some sort of witchcraft has been used. Some of the smaller but still important details include a ribbed chain slap protector, ISCG 05 tabs for a guide or guard, and the cutest little fender protecting the Fox shock.
I've even heard rumours of some esteemed commenters being able to measure reach just by sniffing the bikes.
That was a big reason I switched from Trek to Santa Cruz. Their frames don't break every five minutes and they don't use stupid (expensive) proprietary bearings. Free bearings for life!
That's a pity cause I love their bikes!
I moved from a remedy to the bronson
I'd love a nomad as well but the new bronson just does it for me. Wish it was as capable on the climbs as the remedy but lately I take the lift so problem solved.
I really don't need more travel for a one bike to do it all. Then I have my hard tail wich is a large transition.
If I lived in a resort than yeah I'd love to own a nomad as well but I don't so it doesn't make sense owning that bike.
The new bronson is so capable!
For me its having an XXL frame size. All of these bikes are awesome, and I will admit to drooling over 90% of them, but my 6'6" body only fits on 10-15% of the options out there. A lot of the specifics that come up in reviews can be a preview of bigger rpos/cons for taller riders. "The ACTUAL seatpost angle is a bit slack for today's standards" equates to "your bum will be over the rear axle at full extension". "Reach and stack are conservative" could mean "you're gonna be crotch-clenching that headtube any time the trail gets steep".
We all have to read reviews and translate what they mean for us and our personal requirement in a good bike.
Well I disagree with you, have you ridden a bronson, nomad, remedy or slash?
I'm sure it is. Just for the way I like to ride, I like a bigger bike personal preference
My 2019 remedy was an excellent bike - though as you say it took upgrading the shock from the piece of crap reaktiv deluxe to a factory dpx2 to get it there.
I actually gelled with it better than my nomad, but hey ho, we like what we like.
I was surprised not to see a build with a piggyback shock, considering this is the downhillers XC bike. Was half expecting a Tallboy TR with the new Reserve 37s, 2.6" Tires, a RS Super Deluxe, set up long and low, possibly even with 140mm Pike.
My current Tallboy 3 felt a bit too undergunned on longer descents with this Float DPS (and im on the east coast, so the descents arent long...) I swapped it out for a Cane Creek DBInline and it completely changed the bike for the better.
The shock size also doesnt leave many options. Cant fit the X2. They dont make a DPX2 in 190x45mm, no DVO in that size No Cane Creek... So only option is Super Deluxe.
This bike seems to fall sqaurely in the Trail category now rather than straddling the XC barrier. So im surprised it doesnt have more shock options.
Whats your thoughts on swapping the shock on this bike?
ps. have one pre-ordered and im stoked!
I wouldn't mind something with more adjustments, like a twin-tube 4-way shock like an X2, but it won't fit. The DPX2 does, however. No coil, either.
@mikelevy: thanks for the response. Yeah im mainly disapointed that i cant fit something with more adjustments like the X2, or a Cane Creek. The piggyback would be nice for peace of mind at the least knowing I can take it down longer descents without it fading. I did have shock fade issues on my previous Tallboy and the DBinline made a huge difference. But whatever, i trust the bike companies for some reason. If they couldve made it work, they likely would've. Ill ride the piss out of it regardless. Thanks
In the right conditions, really fast and rocky and hitting everything hard, a couple minutes will do it easy.
I think it's not really a tower, more a semi-detached... HighCondo?
New Giant Trance is one of the best trail bikes ever and it's slightly hampered by Minions because they're too chunky for such s bike.
I get that reviewers who are invited to press launched on some nice trail centers and even lift assisted trails are mainly focused on descent performance and that's why new bikes tend to be specced with sticky rubber.
However, for regular owner of these bikes, it's just too much of a tire that saps power and isn't necessary at all.
Actually, bikes shouldn't only be delivered without pedals, but also without grips and tyres. All down to personal preference.
Trek remedy 2018 with Santa Cruz reserved wheels and specialzed butcher 2.6 tires tubeless and the shock fully opened as for going down
Vs
Santa Cruz Bronson 2019 with the exact same wheels and suspension locked
Result :
The trek climbs way better!
My point is wheels / tires didn't matter
I do 850-900 vert meter climb every year. Different tyres, different physical form. 2 years ago 1h:45 on DH tyres and 180 fork, ok form. Last year 1h:30 on DD with 1 procore and top life form. This year same setup as last year, worst form. 1:40. Another climb, only 250 verts. Difference between last year and this year? 3 minutes. My favorote local loop with 5 steep climbs busting lungs and heart. 2h-2:15 every single time no matter the bike. With friends time varies.
The moral of the story is: at the end of the day, who else than you cares and why would anyone focus on climbing alone? Dissecting this is like saying: which bar width is best for cornering? That is a one dumb question unless you ride slalom course all day every day.
Oh wait....
@msusic very true, even the new Anthem comes with High Roller II. I think people are sort of XC-curious when they get bikes like this, but they need some chunky, slow-rolling rubber on there to show everyone they still get gnarly every once in a while I'm not ashamed of my XCish (downcountry?) tendencies - I still love Ardents but I think I'm the only one...
I wonder how much evidence there is for a fully VS hard tail with the same tires. An unlocked fully will give better grip, and some of that bob is the suspension suspending you, not just pedal squat, so your center of gravity doesn't move up and down as much, but more in a straight line.
On the XC side of things it is well known that a full suspension bike will climb more efficiently on gnarly terrain, but there are efficiency drawbacks for standing sprints and on smoother tracks. The current crop of XC race bikes have remote lockouts to address this.
Dude where I live all the descends are short, so in order to get more laps down you need to climb fast back up.
I hate climbing. Then I also detest it and I feel like puking just thinking of it ( climbing)
So no I didn't do any strava / trail forks bullshit nor raced.
I'm just a mare mortal with a job and kid and grown ups respo and I get to ride when I get to ride
Why would I need those ridiculous " facts" zzzz " to prove" my argument when that's what happened this season.
Got myself a 2018 remedy then bought the reserved wheels laced to i9 hubs got my preferred tires ( butchers jn 2.6) then I had the money for the bronson CC and ordered it.and it's the most fun bike I ever owned although it's not such a good climber as the remedy was, or any other trek I rode ( slash 2016)
That's that.
SC: Why make millions when we can make thousands?
I like 425-433mm chainstays on a TRAIL bike for the really twisty steep stuff that you’d not get a DH bike through...
Lol, oh I can. I’ve ridden some ebikes with 480mm chainstays in the twisty stuff.
Its just not as fun! Trail bikes aren’t really for racing (DH, Enduro and XC are for that).
They are for FUN!
(And as far as the not get a DH bike through, I was talking about trails that a triple clamp fork wouldn’t let you turn tight enough without an endo turn)
Riders in the XS-M range might find the shorter rear end more balanced. While riders on the larger bikes can go to the longer option.
I think different people have different ideas on what they call fun. I personally prefer a bike that handles well at speed over rough terrain rather than a bike I can throw around at slow speed. Each to their own!
All good my friend. The point is adjustable chainstays means it works for you and me :-)
That’s the one comparison I need.
What’s the verdict?
Trance was awesome, loved the geo, climbed well enough, but the suspension was a bit too active. Playful and maneuverable for sure. Could easily be happy on this bike.
The IBIS was like a cross between those two. Playful, climbs AMAZING, suspension has a bit of spring to it when you want it, so easy to boost off stuff and easily get the front end up.
All the bikes cornered great on the mostly flow trails of KT.
IBIS was my pick and I was able to get one! Now riding it on my home trails of Southern New England. Was concerned these new geo bikes wouldn’t take to the right and twisty stuff but it’s been a quick adaptation for me. On the rough (though short) descents I am getting pinged around a bit more than I had been on my 5010. Still tweaking suspension and tire choice so hoping to compensate there. But overall, for 85% of my riding - regular trail riding, trips to KT- I can live with just needing to slow down a bit and being more careful on fast rough descents.
I wish the TB4 had come out earlier so that it was in play for me, will still demo it when I get a chance, but judging by this review I still think that the IBIS is the right choice for me.
But any of these bikes are so much more fun and capable than was I was riding 3+ years ago.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/17631561
when we going to see reviews for stamina 140 vs saturn 14 or similar real boutique??
modern geo, good kinematics, and multiple travel platforms to choose from is generic? f'n sign me up! generic bikes for all!
Sad. As I was reading this article, I kept thinking of the FMB, and how I would get that bike before this thing.
> it climbs as well if not better than all long travel (140mm+) 29er's I've thrown a leg over (pretty much every major model on the market)
I rode a Wreck for 2.5 seasons and would disagree. The current crop of bikes with steep actual seat tube angles climb massively better for me.
@hamncheez because the swing arm would hit the seat tube as it rotates if it had a steeper actual angle with the current suspension design. You either need to move it farther away from the seat tube (longer chainstays) or use less travel (like the Offering).
You have it backwards.
Good news, in 2020 EXT is going to have North American distribution based out of SLC, UT.
Trance was awesome, loved the geo, climbed well enough, but the suspension was a bit too active. Playful and maneuverable for sure. Could easily be happy on this bike.
The IBIS was like a cross between those two. Playful, climbs AMAZING, suspension has a bit of spring to it when you want it, so easy to boost off stuff and easily get the front end up.
All the bikes cornered great on the mostly flow trails of KT.
IBIS was my pick and I was able to get one! Now riding it on my home trails of Southern New England. Was concerned these new geo bikes wouldn’t take to the right and twisty stuff but it’s been a quick adaptation for me. On the rough (though short) descents I am getting pinged around a bit more than I had been on my 5010. Still tweaking suspension and tire choice so hoping to compensate there. But overall, for 85% of my riding - regular trail riding, trips to KT- I can live with just needing to slow down a bit and being more careful on fast rough descents.
I wish the TB4 had come out earlier so that it was in play for me, will still demo it when I get a chance, but judging by this review I still think that the IBIS is the right choice for me.
But any of these bikes are so much more fun and capable than was I was riding 3+ years ago.
On an aside, while I'm currently out in WA I'm originally from VT. I miss those trails dearly.
These bikes works on man-made trails going down, but trail bike should work also on climbs and tight slow turns and natural trails as well as it goes down. Very long bike is stable when going fast descending on bikepark, but that bike is awful on normal riding (non-bikepark).
And that rear shock is at terrible place. All dirt will fly on it and stanchion will be done in a one summer. ...Santa Cruz will replace them as warranty every time?!
Internal brake hose routing... Nightmare for maintenance Seems like the most people is seeking for more difficulties and work. External brake hose doesn't look bad, but it works ...and bikes are made for using them, not for fashion shows.
I prefer the tallboy 3 over this. Altough I think this new one is a great bike, it just doesn't fit my definition of trail. And the Blur Tr is still too XC :-). Hard crowd to please us mtb'ers.
Where does this leave DH? DH is dead apparently and it probably is to a lot of people who only really put up with it because it meant riding fun stuff. I have a lot of mates who like to rabbit on about how stoked they are for selling their DH bike and “consolidating” their bike collection. It makes sense if you never have time to ride one I suppose. That said, I rode a trail bike and my DH bike back to back on an uplift recently on a more tech / gnarly trail and there was a noticeable difference, the latter just felt better, its hard to quantify, so maybe there is still some hope
As for cable routing, I agree with you... but for the average rider, that doesn't wrench much on their own bike, it works.
Sounds like enduro - DH. Trail riding is having good time and challenges while riding up and down, not uplifting/shuttling up and riding down
On CX/Gravel bike It's just not that fun where I live (Brno), because many of the forest roads here are either too harsh for a comfortable ride on rigid bike and also there are many quite steep downhills, which are not a problem for skilled rider on XC bike, but on CX/gravel are no longer fun, because you break all the time and can't even go faster, because you would break your bike.
Yeah you can generally ride everything you ride on XC bike also on CX/gravel bike, but I find these bikes are just not fit for the purpose. Just like you can ride DH lines on a trail bike, except that the difference between the offroad capability of XC and CX/gravel bike is much bigger and the downsides of an XC bike on smooth surfaces are not that big.
However I m wondering if the 65.5° front angle of this new Tallboy is not too much for riding the most tortuous singletracks..
Sometimes I see someone with a Bronson or a Nomad, but I see 20 Sworks Road bikes and 10 Turbo Levos for each Santa Cruz. And by the way, I really don't like Specialized as a brand, but I have to admit they are doing a great job.
I ride a 66hta bike in tight, rocky, forested New England where there are few Pacific Northwest style flow trails to be found. If you think new school short and midtravel bikes are bad technical climbers, you're just mistaken. Unless you're talking trials moves style stuff, which they are less good for, I'll grant you that.
No need to wrench much. For example such simple fix like quickly swapping spare brake on the bike when main brakes won't work 100%
And.... "...stanchion is actually much better protected than normal bikes..."
I can't see any explanation how this new linkage design could be cleaner -or even as clean as- place than the old one. What closer the ground, more dirt is flying on the air. And rear tire is throwing all dirt onto that area. That piece of plastic protects only from directly flying rocks. The pictures here in this review shows how dirty place that is. My rear shocks have never* been that dirty (both are under top tube). * Except when also rider was all over covered by mud.
HTA only tells one chapter of the story
If you want to ride trail, you get a downcountry bike - a.k.a a lightweight xc bike with slacker geometry, like this SC.
If you want to ride enduro/downhill/park you get any of the trail/enduro bikes depending on how much travel you want.
In other words, why the hell to they continue to make size S and XS 29er when they ride so differently than the larger sizes?
In other other words, with such a range of reach measurements, why is there not a range of chainstay lengths?
Seriously, home grown carbon from a small shop on the Colorado front range, what gives?
I’m gonna be truthful with you guys, these reviews are sounding more and more like marketing ... every time I read one of these review, I find myself reading less of the review and I thinking less about the review.
How much seatpost did you have extended? I’m 175cm and would want to be on a L frame.
Will the frame accept a piggyback shock?
the RIPLEY and TALLBOY both this bikes are great but one needs to choose.
i noticed that in many reviews time is not measured and i wonder why since these 2 bikes can do some stage racing too.
i really would like to get your opinion for example if you would to test the 2 on the trails you tested in the reviews, what would be the time difference between these 2 and the second thing is how far the climbing efficiency is between those 2 bikes.
i wish i could do the test my self but there are no demo bikes in XL available for me to check in the local dealers (never was and now with the COVID19 is imposable).
“Rub sealant on it”
Bloody shame, as he was (is) super talented.
V-10 is logical, it has ten inches of travel. So a downhill bike .
Nomad means a traveler of sorts, so it's a bike to huck off things, I guess? These don't match in my head.
Bronson is a funny name but i don't associate it to anything, so i have no idea what kind of bike this is supposed to be.
5010, the same as above but not even a name. I have no idea where this comes from, another bike that looks like the rest but different i guess?
Megatower is mega, so this one is clear to me.
Hightower and Tallboy are the same, but different. I think.
There might be more, but you get the point. Too many bikes that even a fan of the brand like me have no idea what they're about.
I mean is it any different than any other manufacturer? They are just names. Most people are going to shop based on intended use. People will hopefully cross shop models with similar wheel size, geometry and travel.
Honestly I don't get why people get so hyped about bikes, they all seem so generic within a category. Without the info written in big letters on the side, I probably wouldn't even know the make, and basically the only way you can tell SC bikes apart requires reading the model written on the top tube now.
SC is contradicting themselves. Unless they say something like "Well, for 29ers it's different!!"
I think part of the problem is that they (SC) have so many models that barely differ from each other. Most brands have xc, trail and enduro bikes (i left dh bikes out of this for now) but Santa Cruz has 7 bikes across that range...
And given that it was you they would have no reason to disbelieve you, haha.
Tallboy > youtu.be/J0so1Bcbozc
Enduro > youtu.be/lExRsnHZHL8
SC owner was quite surprized to hear what size it is.
Yeah, if you want more weight, and to exclude a chunk of the planets brake routing preference.
For that reason I’ll never buy any bike with a non-Moto brake routing option but the choices aren’t as good as they used to be. Probably due to reviews not even acknowledging the issue?
As a brit running moto brakes I've never had this issue in a decade of riding. Just make sure your hoses are the correct length.
geometrygeeks.bike/bike/santa-cruz-tallboy-2020-1
Just doesn’t feel new and innovative. Santa Cruz didn’t want to risk pissing off the grumpy old man who hates flow trails demographic that buys these bikes I guess. (That’s why they made sure you could put plus tires on this thing...)
It's easy to put a setback post onto a bike to make a STA flatter, but basically impossible to make it steeper. (once the saddle is already pushed forward)
On flatter rolling terrain, steep seat tube angles put much more of your weight on your hands, was getting pain even on short rides.
There are no forward-shifting posts though.
Will 2.6" tires fit the TB but the HT will only take 2.4"? Why?
Also, since almost all the higher end bikes have the same components on them, the reviewer can ignore those things and focus on the actual ride of the bike at a baseline.
ALSO Santa Cruz has TWO more expensive models than the one tested... so there ya go.
Guerilla Gravity allows ala carte and they’ll let you order “off” menu, but don’t expect PB to review the Trail Pistol, GG ain’t got the advertising budget to meet PB’s needs.
HALP!!!!1!1!1!1
We need steeper actual seat angles. We need longer reaches.
So called objective reviews being bought by the big money.
No way that brands with this much influence are giving totally free hand in producing reviews.
Actually, I don't think we want to see that. And you've expressed your disdain for certain Shimano parts in other reviews. Most of us just want to ride, we don't care with PB thinks of two high quality component manufacturers.