Pedaling Innovations' Catalyst pedal was unique when it launched several years ago, and there's still nothing like it. It's a super long pedal, and is designed to be ridden with your foot further forward.
Aston was a big fan of the new riding position they require when he reviewed them, and he's still running a set now. That said, the original version lacked a bit of grip.
Their new Catalyst EVO might change that, as they've reworked the pedal to have longer pins and a few other refinements.
Details• Designed to connect the front and back ends of arch of the foot, it's the longest platform pedal on the market
• Extruded and machined from 6061 aluminum with a T6 heat treatment
• Dual sealed bearings and IGUS bushings
• Heat treated cr-mo spindle with 8mm hey key hole
• 10 pins per side are designed to work with the foot position possible with this design
• New rear entry pins with a two step design provide improved grip
• Available in anodized black, blue, red and grey
• 5.6"/143mm long, 3.75"/95mm wide, .6"/16mm thick
• Weight: 510 grams per pair
• Manufactured by Superstar Components in the UK
• Price: $149.00 USD
• More info at
pedalinginnovations.com | I'm happy to see the pins go through the back now, it's so much easier to replace them this way. The pins themselves are a little longer and they say offer more grip than the previous version. They've also gone from 18 pins to 10 pins per side, so there should be more weight on each pin and theoretically provide more grip. The overall pedal shape isn't too different, and it still has only a small amount of concave. I'm guessing that they don't want too much of a concave shape to disrupt the connection between front and back of your foot.
The other big change is a new IGUS bushing system which should be more robust. The downside is that they feel very stiff to turn by hand, but it wasn't noticeable with weight on the pedals. They also shaved 15 grams from the pedals, even with longer pins, but it's still a fairly chunky 510g per pair. For context that's 145g heavier than my large OneUp aluminum pedals, and 30g heavier than the gargantuan Chromag Daggas. To be honest, since it's more of a trail bike pedal than a traditional wide DH pedal, I do kind of wish they'd offered a lighter Ti axle option. But, that's just my inner weight weenie speaking—this lockdown has me looking at spreadsheets and doing all kinds of stupid stuff.
It's a promising update, and I'm going to spend some time on them this year. We'll see if I become a long pedal evangelist. |
And no, you do not feel the additional weight, the opposite: due to the better power transfer you can pedal up easier than with a smaller pedal where you can only place part of your foot on the pedal. (similar to pedalling a heavier bike with a steeper seat angle up hill, say a Yeti SB150 over the SB5.5).
BTW, I also have this pedal on my Gravel Bike.
Ok, now let's talk 12 degree or more backsweep bars that you will all be running in a few years… :-)
Good to see some manufacturing coming away from Taiwan / China.
www.mooneyesusa.com/v/vspfiles/photos/R3034-2T.jpg
* They sit too close to cranks for my liking. I wish the axle was a little longer.
* The bearings got loose pretty early on, resulting in a very slight amount of side-to-side play, but they work fine for me. I just need to rebuild them I guess. The new version w/ bushings hopefully fixes this issue.
They are great pedals, and really change how I rode the bike after almost a decade on clipless. I actually started putting old Flat pedals i had lying around on most my other bikes, and really have enjoyed going back to basics, and wearing good shoes as opposed to clipless hooves. Playing around with foot position on the pedal is amazing on long rides, and the Catalyst gives you lots of options for putting down power!
Dimensions: I think Bike James is totally right that flat pedals needed to give more support to the foot, loads of grip, and the ability to put power down on these pedals is phenomenal, much larger shift than I imagined coming from clipless. On long bikepacking adventures, being able to ride in sandals is a game changer. So long sweaty feet!!
However.... after buying my pair($100), the price went up to $130(now $150!), and I started looking at what else was out there. I found the Nukeproof Horizon Sam Hill pedals to be very close to the dimensions of the Catalyst, only 100-110mm in length compared to these 143mm. James and Sam nailed the width. So the length is the main difference, and for my feet, the Horizon Sam Hill's give 95% the riding support as the Catalysts; for only $85 MSRP(look for sales though). It is barely noticeable, but I'll be buying the Horizons from here on out.
So if you have bigger than 42 feet, the Catalyst might be your godsend flat pedal. I can imagine Catalyst's platform being much more important to a larger shoe. If you have smaller feet, and want pedals that don't snag on bushes quite so much; Horizon Sam Hills are a great way to save some cash and keep all the other benefits.
pedalinginnovations.com/product/black-catalyst-evo-pedal
pedalinginnovations.com/product/blue-catalyst-evo-pedal
pedalinginnovations.com/product/grey-catalyst-evo-pedal
pedalinginnovations.com/product/red-catalyst-evo-pedal
I have two trail rides on these and good so far with 6 pins per side. Main purpose for buying them was fatbiking in the snow, but I hope to use them bikepacking before winter returns.
Good to see the through mounted pins, what an upgrade over grub screws. The silly pins on my XTs have to be removed with vice grips every time. Hell because of the minuscule allen head and dry thread locker they sometimes need to be installed with vice grips. That's my only gripe with the Shimanos though. Three years in and thousands of miles (I have a pair on my commuter/camping bike too) they continue to spin flawlessly.
[Reply]
1. Bigger square
2. Longer square
3. Wider square
It's all about anatomy for everyone.
(mine one is Wider)
Joking aside it would be cool to give them a try if there was a cheaper composite option.
And it still rides well? Maybe these bike companies are selling us crap with al these 5mm improvements in chainstays and reach.
But going all the way to actual mid foot makes me wonder, won't that make it harder to drop the heels when bombing downhill? On my regular flat pedals in a slightly forward to actual mid foot position I can just drop the heels and they hang in there in a relaxed way. In a actual axle under mid foot won't dropping the heel need to be a deliberate effort?
In any case, would love to try these pedala
You can smash away all day in these things. Give em a try.
A) the price is a bit high for an experiment
B) afraid they're a bit too niche to sell if I don't like them
A bit of a superfluous question I know, more out of curiosity, but anyone knows someone racing with these?
www.pinkbike.com/photo/14232201
Yep I got a 5% increase in average power with my powermeter. Sadly the grip wasn't good enough for my style of riding.
The mid foot position makes sense for pedalling and stability however I don't feel that a standard set of Vaults holds me back in the stability department and the Vaults offer way more grip.
They are ridiculously heavy too! Which is certainly noticeable from my point of view. Hence why they live in a box and I ride the DMR Vaults on the bike!
On a traditional pedal the ball and heel of your foot don't contact the pedal and all the force goes through the arch of your foot.
Painful after a long ride.
You’re wrong.
DMR for the win.
They don´t need to be concave, your foot is STUCK on these!
I have them on all my three bikes and will never buy a "conventional" pedal agian.