Having the skills is no guarantee of success, but as long as assistive technology gives you the opportunity to turn every shot into a hit, the question of whether photography is art becomes irrelevant. The appreciation of art comes when the proportion of success remains infinitely small regardless of the level of skill.
The use of the analogue Leica M6 with a 35mm fixed focal length and 36 shot film showed me, in an rather amusing way, my own personal limitations in several situations: distraction at the crucial moment, being unprepared for the shot, and over-anxiously trying to verify the shot on the display which doesn’t exist on an analogue film camera.
However, I attained true happiness when aperture and shutter speed were occasionally correct by pure chance. I learned to say without being ashamed,
“That was a lucky shot.” It's not uncool to worship the God of fortune in order to avoid the film coming to the end at the decisive moment. Buttering up some shamans is worth a consideration if you want the captured image converting into a real nugget in the camera. By the way, ranting about autofocus is not cool. Messing up the focus is always your own fault.
MENTIONS: @whyex
Great Piece guys, I hope to see more (especially newschool) photographers take up film photography as a way to showcase mountain biking.
The only thing that makes me wonder is the usage of C41 film, which means that it is for standard (well, used to be standard) machine processing for ... colour filrms. More conventional BW requires hand processing in darkroom, which gives much more control over the process (e.g. contrast) and in general better results than C41.
So it's a metter of experience and expectations, if you wanna take picture of a DH racer with lots of focal depth with low ISO well, this ain gonna happen
unless there is a shitload of light all over the place.
Nailed it. Unfortunately there are fewer and fewer who appreciate this in the general populous.
Great article. Excellent.
Note to self: Don't waste you breath asking the following question.
Is there any chance, ever, of a Documentary Photography POY on PB... please, PB.
The images here tell stories. Human stories.They take you in to the moment and leave you with unanswered questions.
That's why, personally, and no-one has to agree with me (nor do I care if you don't), I'll take these over most of the fantastic (and yes, they are fantastic) set ups in the POY contest.
For those interested see here: www.flickr.com/photos/megatryn/albums/72157663966637430
href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/megatryn/albums/72157663966637430" title="Analog Hillbilly Huckfest Ål 2015">
To take a quality picture on full analog camera takes a lot of knowledge and even more skills. That's why I love Hoshis BW pictures - it takes a true craftsman to do such a great job.
Some pics from White Style Leogang 2016
www.pinkbike.com/u/domi3803/album/White-Style-2016-Analog-blackwhite-FILM
btw: "The Hateful Eight" was also completely shot analog and it looks phenomenal!
Movies used to be shot a LOT longer on film than stills... actually, most of the top movies were analogue up until 2012.
source: stephenfollows.com/film-vs-digital
Seriously though. Modern *film* cameras are often capable of recording EXIF. Overpriced Swiss/German optical tech tries to sell you on all sorts of things, mostly elitism.
You might as well have gone with:
"No automatic film advancement"
or
"Parallax Sucks"
or
"Oops that lens was 2500 bucks and not designed to take a fall like that"
Go grab a used F100 for a hundred bucks and do the same thing just as well, this time with EXIF recording on the film, Italian ergonomics and and an autofocus motor. Or you could grab a F3m/e and do the same thing.
www.pinkbike.com/photo/7654772