If you don't mind parting with your money, there are plenty of pricey products out there that offer a questionable return on investment when you do the price-to-performance math. Of course, sometimes that doesn't matter at all. And if it
really matters, you can get a $35 USD dropper post and whatever else from the depths of the internet, just like you could do all your grocery shopping at 7/11 and the local Dollarama. There's also
the Buy & Sell, a good way to save some money if you're smart about it.
But today's video is all about getting the most bang for your buck: Where to spend and where to save on new bike parts.
Cheaper doesn’t necessarily mean worse, or at least not a performance difference someone will notice. Eg. Zee or Guide-RE brakes are probably enough power for most people and they’re not that pricey. Specialized tyres can be had really cheaply and for trail riding are probably 80% of the way there.
I think it makes sense to prioritise the parts you will want to replace least often: So #1: frame, suspension, wheels #2: brakes, pedals, bars, stem, dropper, cranks #3 tyres, grips, drivetrain.
I'm surprised that Mike Levy didn't mention 11 speed. If you get yourself whichever cheap cassette you prefer (we're big Sunrace fanboys and girls in our house) and a GX/XT derailleur + shifter depending which side of the fence you sit.
That's a big save already, without going for home built wheels or Hunts,etc.
The only + to running a Yari is the simplicity of damper service.
Regarding brakes, I can cope with lowest end 4 piston shimanos as I can't afford hopes. I would totally save on brakes also.
For me where to save: everywhere, you just have to know what to buy. For me, the most difficult middle end component to find for really cheap have always been rear shocks.
And needing more than a Yari or appreciating better performance from better forks are two totally different things. Technically, any fork that doesn't break down is 'all you need'. However, I replaced a Fox 34 GRIP with a Mattoc and the difference in confidence when descending is night and day. And the difference between that 34 and the 32 TALAS RL on my other bike is also huge. Forks do make a difference and the stock Yari is a decent but not magical fork. Some benefit from better forks and some don't. You apparently do not. I do.
everyone here is a racer, as for example myself! training hard by day, and doing KOMs by night!
...
Although that has more to do with me being a chicken on rough descents and everything that makes those descents feel less rough makes me faster. People without fear are probably only marginally faster.
Was caught off-guard yesterday while riding with a friend of a friend (I know this sounds like saying ME, but really isn't!), who does a LOT of riding but only just got into the sport 2-3 years ago...... this is his second season on his current bike, and he only just the day before realized he had 2x the pressure he needed in his front fork! He was raving on the way down about how it no longer felt his front end was getting rocketed into the air when hitting roots at high speed and now felt very confident and composed. When talking about it he said he thought having too much pressure really didn't matter before.
He now realizes how valuable proper suspension set-up is.... and also an eye opener that even folks who seem like they should know..... may not!
Sram 11 speed, especially XO1, was the pinnacle of drivetrain components in my opinion. Ridiculously long wear life, super lightweight, took impacts without breaking easily, and unlike 12 speed, wasn’t easily knocked out of adjustment (this is critical).
If it just had the range of Eagle, or at least closer to it, I would’ve been perfect.
Dear Sram, can we please have 10-50 11 speed???
I know i'm probably gonna get downvoted for this, but just because a drivetrain has one less cog at the back, that doesn't make it more reliable. Urban legend. Maybe you had a bad experience with 12spd, but I highly doubt it was because of that extra 1 cog on the cassette.
If you can't get an XO/GX Eagle setup to shift smoothly to the 10T, you're doing something wrong or there is an issue you're not seeing. No offense (seriously).
I read about all kinds of issues online, when I worked as a mechanic i've dealt with issues every day on "robust" and "reliable" drivetrains.
Yet the drivetrains on my own bikes seem to work pretty well, doesn't matter if they're 8spd or 12spd. I just think there are a lot of myths floating around about drivetrain reliability, issues etc. and a lot of issues can be traced back to user error.
This was not as much of an issue on any of the earlier drivetrain transitions you mentioned, but 12-speed appears to have crossed some kind of threshold. As long as everything is perfectly aligned it will shift just as well as any past setup, maybe even better, but it takes very little to knock it out if adjustment. People aren’t just imagining this.
If you're someone who rides on a bike path and never dumps your bike, that's great and a 12 speed will work very well. On the other hand, if you put your bike down once a ride and ride in less than peachy conditions the tight-ass precision 12 speed needs to work truly well goes right out the window. 11 speed is somehow so much more resilient, and same goes for the speeds below barring the walmart-level tech.
There's just no reason to get 12 speed unless it comes on your bike or you NEED to get AXS. As @melonhead1145 said, as long as the drivetrain works, send it. The problem with 12 speeds is that may more of them just don't work well in real life. The shifting performance WILL be worse than *basically* anything else, and you *will* end up spending more money upfront and on replacement parts.
Let's consider the figures of merit for a drivetrain:
-the more time it spends working without intervention
-low price
-high durability and longevity
-range
-low weight (does it even matter that much?)
-ease of repair/tune
-chain retention/low noise
-has more than 5 gears
-efficiency?
12 speed unarguably requires paying more money for less reliability than say an 11 speed system. It's different from the 10 to 11 migration because the decline in performance/price is legitimately noticeable. Take all of the innovations that came with 12 speeds and put them on an 11 system and it'll be better than the 12 speed in every way. What does the extra cog actually give you? A system that's worse and more expensive.
It's objective.
I'm well aware of the "precision needed" because of the "tight tolerances", yet when I install and set up the drivetrains on my own bikes, somehow I don't have to tinker with 12spd stuff (or 11spd or 10spd) all the time, it just works. I don't think 12spd crossed some magical threshold (although according to forum posts etc. we crossed that treshold a few times already ).
I do think a decent amount of people are imagining the whole unreliability thing (after all some people are convinced that the Earth is flat). How many people had the Eagle sync problem, and then it turned out they just didn't know how to set the B-gap? How many bikes (even "professionally assembled" bikes) do you see where the chain length is wrong? Etc...
There are plenty of happy 12spd users out there that put serious miles on their bike without issues, they just don't go on the internet to spread that. But if something goes wrong, of course everyone goes on the forums to get help, complain, and to spread how unreliable 12spd is.
I guess it depends a lot on what you are (trying) to ride. It's a totaly different story if you ride somewhere where you hardly hit any rocks with your derailleur. Totaly different story if rocks keep stroking every second ride.
I get my 12sp setup correct - no problem here. But I also have to service it far more often then my old 10sp.
Still I think it's worth it.
When I was in a pinch and didn't have access to a hanger alignment gauge, I also bent back hangers on my own and friend's bikes with 11 and 12spd drivetrains by threading an axle in the hanger and eyeballing the alignment, and got the shifting dialed in pretty good.
Just curious, what do you need to service more often exactly? Adjustments like indexing? Aligning the hanger? Parts wear quicker? Etc.
However, the chain rubbing on the next cog, especially if it happens in the bigger cogs is not normal on a 12spd system (or a 13spd system, or any system). The hanger or something is probably bent a bit inwards, maybe the freehub and/or the cassette has a wobble in it, or the indexing is off. I've dealt with this issue even on 8-9spd drivetrains when the hanger or the cage was bent inwards.
Larger cogs painted black will show more visible wear on the sides, because every time you shift the chain rubs the next cog a tiny bit (or a lot if something is off).
Keep in mind tho that even on 12spd the chain has a bit of "play" and it can move side to side on the cog. So if the indexing is off, or if the cage/hanger is bent, that can pull the chain to either side on the cog, and of course the chain line is very rarely dead straight, that moves the chain side to side on the cog as well.
I don't know if I have some sort of magic groupset, but personally I haven't experienced the drivetrain going out of adjustment more on 12spd (not counting hitting rocks here...).
10spd Shimano road was probably the worst, since it ran on the old SIS pull ratio, and the early STIs with hidden cable routing were pretty horrible.
A slightly bent der hanger could easily be band-aided trail side with a half-turn of the barrel adjuster on 11-speed. Now with 12-speed, an almost imperceptible bend has the damn thing mis shifting, and correcting it on trail is very difficult without tools. All this is fine if you never crash, but that’s not my world.
All I know is that I had less issues with precise adjustment affecting shifting on all other past drivetrains, and if I could go back to that without sacrificing wide range, I would.
When it comes to hanger alignment, my experience is not the same as yours. I worked in a shop, and I flipped a few bikes. Bent hangers and cages were very very common. I've dealt with bikes with 9, 10, and 11spd drivetrains where to my naked eye everything looked straight, yet I couldn't get the thing to shift perfect unless I used an actual alignment gauge. I also eyeballed a few hanger alignments on 10 and 11spd. Most of the time eyeballing wasn't enough, sometimes I got lucky tho.
In my experience if you hit the RD hard enough that you get shifting issues, the barrel adjuster won't fix those issues a 100%, doesn't matter if it's a 10, 11 or 12spd rear derailleur. I fixed bent 12spd stuff while out on a ride before, and I got it shifting good enough so I could ride home. When you get home, the proper fix is the same for all hangers and all derailleurs, you replace the bent stuff and/or use a hanger alignment gauge.
Shimano makes an 11spd 11-51 cassette, and I think Garbaruk makes an 11spd 10-50. Go back to 11spd, i'm not stopping you. But also keep in mind that there are other variables. Maybe there is an underlying issue you don't know about, and that's what's giving you issues. Two crashes are never the same either.
All I know is that i'm happy with 12spd and I know there are plenty of other people that are happy as well and they ride more and/or harder than me. I know that there are people out there having issues, but plenty of people had issues with older drivetrains as well.
But again, since the inside of the chain is wider than the sprocket even on 12spd, the chain can move a bit side to side, I don't think it's ever perfectly centered.
Prices in CAD
Fork Seals - 50 (100 if getting someone else to install)
Shock service - 150
Brake pads - 120
Tires (1 front, 2 rears) - 300
grips - 30
Cassette - 150
Chain - 50
Wheel truing x2 - 100 (sorry, don't know how to do this one myself)
Every other season
derailleur - 150
pedals - 100
That gets me close to a grand. It hasn't been unusual for me to trash a back rim every season which tacks on about $400, although I've got DT swiss EX rims on now so hopefully I can go a bit longer. Shimano brakes I've had issues with failing after at most 2 seasons so maybe a new master or something. Then start to tack on associated things like gloves and a new helmet every couple years. Yeah having $200 lying around doesn't help me with my general expenses lol YMMV
It's also super sandy here. I do my best to clean the chain with just soap and water every 3-4 rides and lube every 2-3 but there's so much grit that gets into everything that by the end of a season the chain is usually notchy enough that I'll replace it.
All the companies I listed make good products, but the budget stuff a lot of product managers spec sometimes don't hold up for all riders...
Sometimes there is more value in dropping your wheels off at a good shop and then spending your time on other things: play with your kids, fix your car, cross-train, lift, sleep, eat, screw, comment on PB, shop for new bike parts, etc etc.
(Says the guy who is currently shopping for a (legit, not poor-man's ziptie-on-seatstay) truing stand to build wheels for a retro mtb build) and also trying to find room in the basement "bike shop" to put it)
sure, get a starter tool kit and learn to do cables and brake pads and rotors and such, but wheel-building is usually not considered "basic" maintenance. maybe poor-man's ziptie-truing in between shop service counts as basic, but that doesn't require the full investment of a truing stand.
if your budget wheels need truing that often, then the same thing applies: instead of spending on a truing stand, or waiting for the shop, spend on better wheels and get more (valuable) time back in your pocket.
But yeah, it is a trade off. The question here is, how to save money. That is, do more yourself. If next weeks question is, how to save time then sure, the answer will be to do less yourself.
Adjusting cup and cones and spokes is a huge money and time saver in the long run. Servicing cup and cones will cost between nothing and 25 cents and only takes like 10 minutes. Just running cup and cone instead of sealed bearings is cost effective.
As for quality time, just cut up the process in as many pieces until it becomes comfortable. No point doing it in a single go. I compare it to knitting. You can do it whilst chilling with friends and family, it will just take a bit longer. I built my most recent wheel last summer (DT 350 rear hub, Alpine III spokes, brass nipples and Spank Spike rim with a really basic 3 cross pattern) and took it really easy. It might have taken me over three hours spread over a couple of days. Talking and sipping tea when building, taking many breaks swimming, hiking, cycling. I could have been faster, more focused etc. But I don't need to.
The point here being, it is your choice, your time and your process. You can make it whichever way you want it. Time of day, alone or with friends and family, one single go or split in as many pieces as you want, it is all up to you.
The way I look at it is that with these big tyres at 21 psi, 170mm of suspension and disc brakes it doesn't matter if your wheels are not exactly straight. It's pretty easy to get them within a millimetre, which is straighter than the tyres in most cases. Absolute truth is just not that important on a mountain bike. Strength is a lot more important. When my rims get bent I don't try to true them these days as long as they are witjin a couple of mm. It's better to have them a bit out and have even spoke tension, in my opinion.
Recommendations on cheaper hubs that are less likely to be explode would be awesome.
charge for labor.
Spend: Tyres, Pedals, Brakes (Tyres with proper sidewalls and compounds that suit your discipline, a well designed flat pedal vaults etc, and some decent stoppers to suit your discipline)
Semi Spend: Suspension, Drivetrain, Wheels, Frame (Lyric Select, SLX, Alloy not carbon etc...)
Budget: Seatpost, Saddle, Bar, Stem (Budget droppers are good, a saddle with basic rails and materials, Entry RF or Nukeproof cockpits are banging)
Things like grips etc, no category needed, get what feels nice on your paws!
Usually they have 0%apr if you pay them off in a year. So let's say you just finished paying off your car note and you want a new bike, breaking that down to a monthly "car payment" would get you one hell of a bike. Thats just easier for most people than trying to swallow one big 4000 dollar payment.
I have a mortgage, it is the only debt I carry. When I applied for a loan, I didn't have a credit score. I got a cheap card, used it for groceries each month for 6 months, and got a great loan. I haven't borrowed anything since and now have a nice savings account.
I once had a car loan, it doubled the total price. I was a chump.
Your car loan was so ridiculous because...you guessed it, lack of credit.
There is a difference between financing and "going into debt".
If you want to build credit, yeah, buy things on a card - and pay them off promptly. Instead of using your debit, use credit and transfer the coin before the end of the month, and stay within your means - THAT is a smart way to build your credit. But buying a $4000 bike on a regular credit card and paying off over a year is going to cost you hundreds of dollars. Personally, not what I could call the most favorable way to build your credit.
Paying off promptly doesn't do much for credit, paying on time is more important. To gain credit using a standard card you will have to pay interest.
On the credit cards and credit score, paying promptly and paying on time are the same thing in my mind. - ultimately, paying your balance before it comes due and you accrue interest. This will will help build your credit score just the same. You don't need to pay a dime in interest, believe it or not. It's more about forming a history of good payment habits. I'm sure VISA and MasterCard want you to accrue and pay interest, but they aren't who give you your credit rating. And they still benefit from all the transaction fees they charge vendors, regardless of whether or not you ever pay a cent in interest. Light use and low balances will do you just fine if you can swing it. I've rarely if ever carried a balance and paid interest on any of my cards, ever. From my university days to current day. I did just fine when I went to buy a car, and a house.
I definitely agree with the OP's sentiment though. I would prefer to save, rather than load up on financing and card debt for leisure and luxury purchases. To me that's a sign that I can afford them. If I can't save for it and buy with cash, I simply cannot afford the toy. That's just my mode of operation of course.
I'm not her to argue financial savvy. Maybe some day I will take your guys advice and head down the road of shitty loans and bad credit card rates. Having single digit interest when i need it is pretty good though, so i doubt it.
My approach seems to work just fine. I have a very healthy credit score, and would have no issue getting a 'single digit interest' rate not far above the prime rate if I needed it for some reason. And as far as credit cards go, I'll go with the one with best perks, usually travel perks - I don't care about the interest rate because I don't carry a balance to accrue any.
Personally, I rather ride a shitty bike that is paid for than a fancy bike on a payment plan.
I'm gonna need you to read this really slow, I never told anyone to rack up credit card debt, and getting a mortgage isn't difficult. I promise you having better credit gets better rates. Thats why people with no credit are taking about paying twice over on a car note and 25% on their cards.
But please, tell me again about your mortgage. You clowns seriously don't understand paying rent and phone payments build credit because you are signing yourself into a payment plan... that is debt.
One more time since you all have the comprehension of a bag of potatoes. If a bikeshop or manufacturer offers you a zero percent payment plan that's easy credit, thats all.
Dont tell me about getting a mortgage like
its an accomplishment. Getting a car loan isn't an accomplishment, getting ATT to sell you a $1800 phone isn't some sort of accomplishment, filling out a getting a credit card from target isnt an accomplishment. Its easy as hell you get debt. I have a $600,000 line of credit, whoopty-doo, it doesn't mean im worth half a million cash.
But yeah, i guess ill fire my financial advisor and just go with a group of dumbasses thatcant stay on topic and want to mansplain credit cards.
Personally, I just see him spreading misinformation and propigating bad personal finance management advise. But hey, who am I to tell anyone how to spend their money, or spend their credit. Fill your boots Ron my buddy!
Its pretty easy to track your credit and see what helps and hinders your score.
It's your opinion that buying a bike on credit is a good thing, or at least a good way to build credit, when it's a 0% apr and you can pay off within a year. My apologies for not understand this in my first post. My point is that buying luxury items on credit is in my opinion, not a great practice, and there are better ways to build credit while not actually taking on debt for 12 months. You are entitled to your opinion, and expressing it. So am I. I don't care if you agree with me, and I'm not going to call you a clown or tell you that you have the comprehension of a bag of potatoes I'd you don't. But you have thrown out these exact insults. I don't need to insult you or attack you on a personal basis, because I'm confident that I'm right, I'm perfectly okay with being challenged in my understanding of finances, and I don't have thin skin.
I'm also not sure what's wrong with being pro-credit card, by the way. I myself am pro-credit card - on the basis they are used with responsibility. Basically my entire point, responsible and measured use of credit of any sort is fiscally prudent, and will gain you a good credit rating.
You got the bike for the sticker price, but if you went in with cash I have to wonder if you would have gotten a lower purchase price, by whatever the discount rate was that was embedded in the whole financing deal.
Maybe that's not true, pending where you bought the bike. A direct to consumer brand is not likely to offer this as it would devalue the bikes (by having two prices), but you can be guaranteed I'd you went into a or private shop, or a car dealership who was offering 0% interest terms, you would likely come out with a purchase price lower than the tag if you paid on debit.
Of course that only works if you have a lump sum of cash in your account. But, there is interest in that sticker price.
And I monitor my own credit with the Eqifax credit monitoring app. More for fraud prevention than anything else.
My 2 bike shops, one has free layaway, one has free 12 month financing. Believe it or not, some people would rather spend 500 a month than 6000 all at once. Some places give you the option.
I'm not anti credit card, or pro credit card, I've made no suggestions about them. If you read my first post you will see I dont recommend spending money you don't have or financing things you can't afford. I simply suggest taking advantage of credit in a responsible manner.
Building credit is about showing consistency and reliability handling finances, it isnt about keeping money in your mattresses.
I think we can out the credit card issue to bed. I think we not so out of sync here.
And yes, financed price by the end of a finance term, even with a '0% rate', and the pay up front price, generally speaking, always differ if you get under the hood. Car dealerships are a f
Great example. They advertise 0 apr, you walk in with cash, you will get a lower price or a cash rebate, and the dealer will be ambivalent because it's the same to them either way. There is a coat for financing - lenders charge an interest rate for this. If the dealer is advertising 0% rates, then the present value of the purchase is somewhere lowered than the sticker price, there is interest, and the sum of the two, the future value, is the sticker price you see.
I'm not sure how sophisticated your shop is with finances and accounting. Or how rigid they are with pricing, but I can tell you if they are financing with any sort of financer or lender, the above paragraph is true for them too. If they are just a ma and pa shop who offer 12 month payment plans (credit) on their own dime, the is a whole other kettle if fish business strategy, but it too costs them something, though perhaps the additional sales outweigh that cost.
As for cars I deal specifically with no haggle dealers with cash, either from savings or from my own lender at a rate no dealership can touch. I highly recommend no haggle dealers.
The thing about carbon rims that I don’t get outside of the XC race world, why do you spend another grand to save 100 grams per wheel when your tires weigh 1100 grams when the best carbon wheels now are trying to give you the feel of aluminum. 100 grams at the rims mean a lot when you are running 400-700 gram tires, but who runs those anymore outside of the XC crowd?
The argument that you can bend alloy rims back is silly, because the carbon ones just won't ever get that kind of damage, and the impacts that do break good carbon rims would also have destroyed an alloy rim beyond the point of bending it back.
I got carbon rims without thinking about weight at all. In fact, I got them to minimize thinking about rims at all. They just take everything and don't care. Tire pressure a little low and worried about dinging the rim? Don't worry, the rims will be fine, worry more about ripping those 700 gram tires.
I know guys who can wreck an aluminum wheel in a week that can get a full season on carbon wheels you can’t compare them on weight, it’s like comparing an inline shock with rebound adjust to a proper piggyback shock with compression and rebound adjustments and saying the inline is better because it weighs less.
To me,I setup my bike to tank any trail,2ply dh tires and good wheels,cos worst&easy thing is a flat,or waiting for someone flat tire to be repair.
Then,no fancy parts in the wear items,just what you need to forget about it.
If I must choose only 1 upgrade to my bike,a would choose a good (to my taste if needed) front tire,that´s it.
It's extra scientific if you can remove decals etc. / reduce the time the test pilot gets from picking up the bike to riding the hot-lap to make it difficult to tell which is the fancy schmancy componentry.
PS. Don't tell Shimano / SRAM / Fox what we're up to.
It is brand which has great products in terms of price and quality.
Those grips are also very durable and super comfy for every type of riding. I also had issues with grips but these are between super cushy ESI ones and harder rubber ones:
reverse-components.com/en/products/seismic-ergo-%C3%B834mm
Protect your hands????
Brakes could be improved but I haven't had any issues yet and I am going to get that Acolyte 12-46 cassette to replace my Advent 12-42 8-speed cassette.
Look for new old stock (NOS) or take-offs. They are new parts. The way I looked at it was if I had bought the bike 3 years ago, would I still be riding it. In other words, do I need 20mm more of reach and a 2 degree steeper seat tube? They would be nice but they would be $1,000 more. I can wait until the next build.
2. Don’t buy the most current model, find close-outs that are being discontinued.
2. Do not buy during or before the riding season, but at the end or during the winter time.
My ride is discontinued( 2014 design), 3 years old and a blast to ride. I am just now, finally, getting the suspension tuning “just right.”
The frame is the one component that you should never go cheap on, since even if you buy relatively cheap, it's by far the most expensive item. And thus it would be horribly uneconomical to upgrade later. So if you buy cheap to begin with but can't upgrade later, because it's uneconomical, that means you bought a cheap frame and are now stuck with it. Besides limiting your build, it also dictates the standards for the rear shock, rear wheel, fork travel length, dropper post diameter, etc. So when you would eventually come around to upgrade your cheap frame, you will most likely not even be able to fit all of the old components onto your new frame. Meaning you'll have to get new parts, effectively making the upgrade even more expensive. Never ever buy a cheap frame, if you have upgrading in mind. Just buy a good one to begin with.
Next thing you know, you'll be using "orientate". Save yourself while you can.
P.S. Tire pressure, lessons, tires, brakes, wide aluminum rims. That's my list.
i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/566/702/3f2.jpeg
From what I see many could start with upgrading tires + tubeless, right tire pressure and eventually combined with proper wheels (especially rims with the correct width).
The second thing that I see underspecd quite often are breaks. Many brands offer or used to offer cheaper builds with breaks on quite capable frames (in large / x large) that are just not made for the intended use of the bikes. Having cheaper 4 piston breaks available on the market (hopefully) changed that.
What has been totaly overlooked: pedals
If one is about to build his own bike I assume he already knows what to look for. At least I don't know many who build up their bikes from scratch and don't have a clue what to buy.
No, cheaper parts doesn't mean the ride can't be fun it just means that for a lot of riders they will always wish they had more hence why they drool and want something with better shit.
Apply this to anything: Cars, clothes, boats, etc etc
Carbon frames can often be fixed, relatively inexpensively. Heck, it's some times possible to do it yourself. Alu frames are, in general, welded with special Smartium(TM) gas by the Stem Leprechauns in the vacuum of outer space. Crack = throw it away.
I've seen plenty of fixed carbon seat stays after the inevitable rock strike from standing still. Never saw one alu fixed. Yes, carbon fixing will add grams, and at least DIY will look fugly, but it's a bike.
Same goes for wheels - I've star-formed 5 or 6 $500-ish alu rims over the last few years, and done my best to try and do this to carbon without luck. I've even DIY fixed a rim after a spoke pulled through the rim - using epoxy glue, and it's still good.
Oh, and dropper posts - the most impressive one I've run, and still do, is the Brand-X ascend 150mm 30.9. It cost me GBP 100, and it just refuses to die. No service for almost three years, all-year-riding, even the coating has worn off so I have to lube the raw aluminium pre-ride. But it still works.
However....next burly bike build will be an aluminium frame, as I'm not badass enough to rob a bank.
The best IMO is to buy the cheapest bike (not talking about trash brands) and as you ride it upgrade only the things that matter to you.
My decision was based on how much I would be riding, if it was a couple of times per month I would buy used. But since I ride almost daily I decided to go with new and I didn't regret it for a second.
I'm not a fan of upgrading bikes slowly either. If you pay more upfront, it's better in terms of bang to buck ratio. It's very rare that for example one model comes with Deore, and the next model comes with SLX, but that's the only difference. Usually you get more goodies like a better fork, better wheels etc. If you buy those same parts as upgrades after you buy the bike, it comes out more expensive.
Sometimes you can find very very good used deals where someone rides a bike for like a month and then puts it up for sale. But you can get burned as well if you don't know what you're doing. A lot of people treat their bikes like crap.
I wouldn't buy an older used bike personally. You might get "higher level" parts, but newer, but lower end parts might work just as well or better.
IMO buy new from a direct to consumer brand.
A number of staff build their own bike from parts. Have two builds. A cheap/satisfactory build and a midrange build.
Good video.
(asking for a friend)
"And if it really matters, you can get a $35 USD dropper post and whatever else from the depths of the internet..."