Field Test: 2022 Canyon Lux Trail - A Revised Racer

Dec 8, 2021
by Henry Quinney  

PINKBIKE FIELD TEST

Canyon Lux Trail



Words by Henry Quinney, photography by Tom Richards


The new Lux Trail shares a lot with the standard Lux, including the rear triangle and many very similar dimensions, but it is a new bike. Or at least half of one, thanks to a new front triangle that was added for 2022. This new front end increases the frame's reach by 30mm per size. It also is slightly steeper in seat tube angle, as well as being slacker in the head tube angle.

How you feel about the Lux Trail could depend on whether you prefer incremental refinement or page-one-rewrites. The Lux TR, despite seeing the reach grow substantially, seems more about the former than the latter. Before we get to that, though, let’s look at the frame details.
Canyon Lux Trail CF8 Details

• Travel: 110mm rear / 120mm front
• Wheel size: 29"
• Head angle: 67.5°
• Seat tube angle: 74.5°
• Size tested: medium
• Reach: 460 mm
• Chainstay length: 435 mm
• Sizes: S, M, L, XL
• Weight: 26lb 10oz (12.1kg)
• Price: $6299
canyon.com

This bike has 110mm of rear travel, which is delivered via a single pivot design with flex stays, a layout that's quite common in the cross-country world. Even with the trail moniker bolted onto the model name, I would say the Lux Trail is still very much an XC bike, much like the Santa Cruz Blur TR we also have in this field test. The Canyon has the steepest head angle, as well as the slackest seat tube angle, of all the bikes on test. There are also other dimensions that might catch your eye, including the long effective top tube length - it measures 627mm for a size medium, and a whipping 650mm for a size large.

For that reason went with a size medium for this round of testing. I was able to try the large earlier this year, and found that that bike simply felt too big for me during seating pedaling. To their credit, Canyon's sizing chart does seem to do a good job of recommending the appropriate size in this case - it puts me between a medium and a large (I'm 183cm tall).

photo

North American Canyon customers will be able to purchase the Lux Trail with longer dropper posts, but in Europe this bike will come with the super-light, XC race-oriented, Transfer SL. This post has, at most, 100mm of travel. That does seem to go against the Lux Trail's downcountry intentions, and it's something to keep in mind if you're looking at this bike outside of North America.

Another indication of the Lux TR’s racing heritage would be the dual lockout - it was the only bike in the Field Test to come with one. Suspension duties are handled by a RockShox SID fork and Deluxe shock pairing. In terms of performance, the SID is a fantastic fork and almost rescues an XC bike's descending capabilities. However, much like on the Trek Top Fuel, our fork developed bushing play.

Canyon does gets some details bang on. Firstly, I think their execution of a rotation limiting headset is a better execution than Trek’s Knock Block. Although it sits externally to the headtube and could be argued it doesn’t look as well integrated, it’s simpler and functionally better.

There is also the best-on-test chain device. The svelte number sits within the pivot hardware and works very well. It’s fabulously light, clean looking and really means there is no reason not to run one. The bike can fit two water bottles inside the front triangle, and has a universal derailleur hanger along with internally guided routing. It also features Canyon's two-in-one axle that manages to combine a lever of ample size that slots into the axle itself to leave a clean and tidy look.



photo
photo

Climbing

When compared to the similarly-sporty Santa Cruz Blur TR the Lux Trail doesn't offer the same level of grip on seated climbs. In terms of shock performance, and the feeling it delivered, it was pretty middle of the road, which is no bad thing. It managed to be a very reasonable halfway house between XC-responsiveness and providing a platform that will respond well to large accelerations or shifts in where your weight is sitting.

We always conduct our efficiency tests in the seated position with forks and shocks open. In this setting, the Lux Trail was the 4th fastest bike in this test (out of 6), as well as on the timed single track climb. Using the lockout might have added some efficiency, but that comes at the cost of comfort, and it's not a setting that's particularly useable on actual trails. I understand the appeal of the lockout for cross-country bikes, but I don't think it's necessary on this particular model.

The bike definitely carries its weight where its numbers would suggest. It's not the lightest bike in this category (the Blur TR is nearly two pounds lighter), but it does have a very classic XC feel. Out of the saddle the 460mm reach felt okay - it puts your weight very much on the front axle, which is a benefit when climbing.

Thanks to that shorter top tube of the medium, manipulating your weight and exercising it over the front axle was easier. It wasn't totally different from the Santa Cruz in this regard, however, the Lux Trail is nearly 15mm lower in the frame stack, which does accentuate this sensation. It felt lively and easy to boss around, both while standing and seated, if not particularly precise.

photo

photo
photo

Descending

On the descents, the Luz Trail falls into a similar category as the Santa Cruz - it's closer to cross-country race bike as opposed to a short-travel trail bike. However, there are some big differences between the two. First, the Santa Cruz is far more comfortable. The Lux Trail is prone to harsh bottom outs, which means you have to run quite a high spring rate. The consequence of this is a firmer, less compliant ride, which made for some jarring moments on rougher sections of trail.

The frustrating thing about the Lux is that it didn’t seem to have one area where it really shined. It wasn’t the lightest, fastest, most comfortable, most feature laden or best handing. It does offer a good value when looking solely at the frame and parts spec, but otherwise there's not one particular handling trait that elevates it above the other downcountry bikes.

Timed Testing

The downcountry bikes were all tested on a section of trail that included a mix of everything you'd expect to find on an aggressive XC loop. The first section included a rock slab into some braking chatter, before the track opened up into fast turns and some small drops and jumps.

Don't forget that timing is just one of many ways to judge a bike, and fast doesn't always mean it's the best for everyone.


Henry Quinney: "The Canyon didn't manage to break out of the midpack on any of our timed tests. In fact, it was the fourth fastest in the efficiency test and the single track climb. It was also the fourth fastest on the timed descent, where it just pipped the Giant Trance and the Santa Cruz Blur TR."
I think redesigning the front triangle could have yielded such promise, but this revision seems a bit lukewarm. If this bike was a degree slacker in the head tube, and a degree or two steeper in the seat tube I think it would have begun to make sense. The effective top tube would have been brought into check, and the bike would potentially be less skittish on the descents too.

Our bike came with a 125mm drop seatpost. This is ample for the medium that it is, but as we’ve already gone into, it’s not true to size anymore. In America, the good news is that the other models come with a 150mm post, which is more appropriate for a bike like this. However, as was mentioned earlier, the Fox equipped bikes that are sold in Europe come with posts with only 100mm of drop. In addition, the small two-pot brakes and the 160mm rotor in the rear that’s enacted upon by a flat-mount road-style caliper mounting are also more appropriate for an XC bike rather than one with Trail in the name - it's a shame there isn't a version with a slightly beefed up spec.

Where you ride your bike is of course really important, and in recognition of this we deliberately rode trails that were downcountry-appropriate. Even still, the Lux Trail struggled to shine on any part of them, be it climbing or descending. If the Santa Cruz left it red faced by being all that it could have been, bikes like the Rocky Mountain Element or the Trek Top Fuel made it look like it was meant for a different category entirely. Realistically, it's better to look at the Lux Trail as modern cross-country bike rather than trying to pull it into the downcountry pool.

There's no denying that Canyon's prices do present a good value, and for riders who simply want to put in the miles on mellower terrain the Lux Trail might be the ticket. However, if you do want to push hard, there are simply better candidates.

photo

Pros

+ Excellent value
+ 'Traditional' pedaling position will appeal to those who don't like steep seat angles
+ Chain guide and bar rotation limiter are well executed
Cons

- Not particularly confidence inspiring on the descents
- Long reach with slack seat tube can make sizing difficult
- Heavy considering the spec





The 2021 Fall Field Test is presented by Rapha and Bontrager. Thank you also to Maxxis, Schwalbe, and Garmin for control tires and equipment.


Author Info:
henryquinney avatar

Member since Jun 3, 2014
327 articles
Report
Must Read This Week
Sign Up for the Pinkbike Newsletter - All the Biggest, Most Interesting Stories in your Inbox
PB Newsletter Signup

146 Comments
  • 139 6
 I could listen to Henry review a cardboard box
  • 78 0
 Note to self: start Pinkbox.com and sell to Outside
  • 14 0
 @Dogl0rd: Outside the Pinkbox?
  • 32 0
 @Dogl0rd: I'm not sure you'd get the intended audience with that name.
  • 2 0
 @Dogl0rd: the domain is for sale, $78,000
  • 27 0
 Wow! Thanks! Haha. If Squamish rent keeps going up, you may well be in luck.
  • 2 0
 I like the way Henry and Mr. Happy (nice one Kaz at 10:50) go back and forth.
  • 1 0
 @Dogl0rd: pinkbox.com domain is $1650 per month rent or $78000usd domain name purchase!
  • 2 0
 @lehott: wouldn't take many of us to pay that
  • 2 0
 If you gave Henry two IDENTICAL bikes, different colors, he could easily give you an eloquent 1,000 word article about how one seems more playful and energetic while the other feels more,,, planted and sure footed. Keep it up Henry!!
  • 1 0
 @lehott: pink box is a pretty trendy donut shop bet they are hoping to sell it to them at some point.
  • 1 0
 When I first heard Henry on the podcast I was picturing a long haired, long beard, wizard looking guy.
  • 1 0
 @wheelsmith: that’s what I imagine everyone looks like until proven otherwise.
  • 66 1
 Can’t be good value if it’s a bad bike
  • 2 0
 But updated to geometry of 2014! Why does perpetuating old road-bike designs on dirt have to be a bad thing?
  • 43 0
 All we care about is the Element review!
  • 13 0
 The cream of the crop always comes at the end Smile
  • 32 0
 Tomorrow. Smile
  • 15 2
 I heard they are going to do the trail bikes first and circle back around to the Element next month
  • 11 0
 @jasonlucas: Element field test + PB Academy in the same day! PB delivers on Thursday!
  • 3 0
 Yea its the only frame in the whole field test I would consider selling one of my frames for...
  • 2 0
 @jasonlucas: I just need to justify my purchase is all lol
  • 2 0
 I tried to buy the element and its not available until Jan 2023 so w/e
  • 3 0
 @mariomtblt: email Rocky Mountain, they can probably help you source a dealer with the bike on back order for 2022. They helped a friend of mine do exactly that for the new Powerplay models.
  • 1 0
 @m47h13u: ah nice will do!
  • 1 0
 @m47h13u: +1 on this... they helped out.
  • 2 0
 For real..... Based on the other reviews, looks like the Element comes out on top from a score perspective but still curious to see the review!! I have the new 2022 frameset in my basement, doing a custom build and can't wait.
  • 2 0
 Would lovely to know how it compares to the spur...
  • 41 0
 But how does it handle disappearing ramps?
  • 21 0
 That landing has shaken all the SIDs in the world, thats why they all have the bushing play...
  • 12 0
 It doesn't, you're sh*t out of lux!
  • 28 0
 So this one is all but decided. The RM will be interesting but radical.

Levy will love the Blur. Henry will love the Trek.

Levy plays to the audience, the populist.

Henry won't spare anyone's feelings and btw what are feelings?

Man, this is great.
  • 27 0
 "the SID is a fantastic fork....our fork developed bushing play"

Bike couldn't have more than 500 miles on it and another bad SID, wow. Won't even consider one of these for a new bike.
  • 7 0
 I read about this for Scott Spark RC as well. SID has a problem.
  • 6 0
 I'd been hearing rumblings that this was only a problem with the first year of production. Sounds like that's definitely not the case. Too bad, everyone seems to love them before the bushings evaporate.
  • 4 0
 SRAM shaved a little too much weight on the new SID. I’ll bet 50-100 grams of extra bushing would solve the problem.
  • 2 0
 Same happened in the Transition Spur Review... wow that's reallysomething to consider!
  • 1 0
 think it is made for skinny people... not a chance here..I stick to Pike and above
  • 1 0
 I have 95kg, rode ~7000km MTB on technical trails in 2021 on my SID Ultimate and no troubles whatsoever. The fork feels and works great!
  • 27 0
 Henry would fit right into the movie "snatch" with his way of phrasing things
  • 23 0
 Why do they call him the bullet dodger?

Because he dodges bullets, Avi
  • 3 0
 ** plays lucky star **
  • 3 0
 Wanna see if I've got the minerals?
  • 28 1
 Off-Road Bi-Cyclist? Ouch.
  • 3 0
 @plustiresaintdead "Bi"?
as in swings two ways, or wears baggies over shaved legs?
  • 9 0
 @taprider: Even worse, baggy shorts with a road jersey
  • 21 1
 I have one. It’s absolutely just a regular xc bike with canyon trying to make it more sexy by labelling it as a more trail ‘dwncntry’ bike. So then I downcountryed this ‘downcountry’ bike’ like I always do with xc bikes like this. 4 pot in the front, riser bar, new rubber. It is NOT that bad of a bike like this review maybe made it to be.

The dimensions are a bit weird, agreed, but maybe I got lucky and it just fits me. (Sized down to M instead of the usual L) The geo is just fine for an xc bike. As is the firm suspension platform.

Having had a Hightower V2 (the blue one) I m not surprised that Santa Cruz did a better job. But you can almost double your spendings if you want one. And for an XC bike I’m absolutely not willing to do that. I was looking for a simple mile muncher with lots of water storage capabilities. Check!

Pemberton BC is atypical terrain for an xc bike. Most will want a bigger bike in that area. I find that more extreme terrain tests the geo of a bike at the extreme ends. Shortcomings will quickly show themselves their. BUT, if you live where I live, (reasonably flat boring landscapes), than the shortcomings of some aspects of a bike’s geo don’t matter that much. So in that regard, why would I have double my spendings if this bike, in my terrain, just plain works and just deserves to be called ‘a good -xc- bike.

XC stands for across the country. And this bike is great for just riding ‘across the country’. But nowadays all mountainbikes need to firmly live up to the extremes of the labels they have been put on. Be it xc (for some mistakenly synonymous for xc racing), downcountry, trail, enduro etc

Only if the geonumbers reach the extremes of a certain category, is it a good bike. And if you live in BC I understand why it matters. But I don’t agree with that trend pinkbike pushes.
  • 4 0
 yeah, I agree with your sentiment for the most part - especially that there are places for a bike like this, and Pemberton probably isn't one of them. I just think the bike is a missed opportunity. They had the chance to make the change from the regular Lux more significant, so it can really be used as a lightweight trail bike. I don't think it has to be slacker or anything. But there is no good reason to spec a 160mm rotor on it, or make the seat tube that long, or fit such a short dropper post. All of these things wouldn't make it a worse bike for mile munching, but they would give it more options to have fun when the terrain gets steeper
  • 2 0
 @hardtailpunter: True. It is a typical Canyon bike IMO. Lots of missed (geo) opportunities or annoyances (like those long seattubes on most of their models), but still -overall- a good bike for the money. IMO this should have been the original Lux 2-3 years ago when it was first launched.
  • 1 0
 @JWP: yup, you're right - Canyon usually makes pretty decent bikes with a really good component spec for the money, but in terms of progressive geometry they always seem to be a few years behind the curve. Happy that you enjoy yours, though Smile
  • 9 0
 I always thought that Canyon was lazy with this trail model. The frame is only slightly tweaked from the XC version and it shows in ride quality. This was a quick, calculated jump on to the downcountry bandwagon by Canyon trying to get your hard earned dollars. I was weary of this bike, this reviewed sealed it, I will gladly spend another 1K for a better ride.
  • 2 0
 Ya this was on my radar, but ended up going Epic Evo. Kinda glad I did.
  • 1 0
 Don't know if lazy is the right way to put it. It's a new front triangle after all - they just went a weird way with it.
  • 14 3
 It can't be that bad if it's beating a longer travel Santa Cruz costing $3000 more down a hill
  • 7 0
 I've put 500km on one, here's my list of pros and cons:

+ I'm 6'3"", I don't have to run a 90mm stem any more! It's odd that the geo numbers look weird but the fit is good. It is a stretched out position but that suits me for long XC rides especially if there's wind about.
+ The firm suspension is sooo good for XC, it does get worked in roots and rocks, but the 110mm shock has handled the Quantocks and Welsh hills very well. I brought it for long XC rides and there's no need for any more 90% of the time
+ Dual lockout - ask again if it's necessary after 3 hours of riding in hills at threshold. Well worth it.

- 160mm rotors... Santa Cruz got that right, I'm swapping to 180mm. Also the brakes took a couple of full bleeds to sort out.
- the CF8 is a bit on the heavy side due to AXS, but with thousands of pounds to save Vs the Evo or Blur, there's plenty of opportunity to add some carbon
- the geo makes the front stay planted, so getting airborne and manualling are harder than on the Epic Evo. I've lost most of Pinkbike with that statement.

In summary it's an XC marathon bike, it's very good at that, and if I ever come to Pemberton I'll be finding someone with an Element they can lend because that geo looks nuts for BC chunk.

Love the field tests, keep them coming.
  • 2 0
 Swapping wont work @ the rear. It's actually a roadbike caliper. Max 160mm. I mounted a 4 pot @ the front. But that doesn't solve the small 160 at the rear off course.
  • 1 0
 @JWP: thanks, in that case that's a negative for Canyon customer service, who assured me it was possible. I did wonder as it's a direct mount.
  • 3 0
 I rode 160mm rotors and front 180 for years.. still do sometimes.. even in a bike park.. never felt, i didn't have enough braking power.. not sure why everyone needs 202s front and rear...
  • 9 0
 Obligatory "hope it doesn't break because US Canyon customer service SUUUUUCKS".
looks neat tho
  • 4 0
 Gotta say, I had a USA frame warranty with them in July and they really treated me well.
  • 6 0
 The sizing is really weird on this bike. With making a new front triangle, they had a chance to create a really cool bike... instead they got a person with a 28in inseam and huge torso and the longest arms to design it.
  • 1 0
 All Canyon bikes run large for some reason.
  • 1 0
 @Nygaard: Its not just they run big, its just weird geo all around.
  • 8 0
 Can I just say, you three look so cute scrunched together at that tiny table
  • 5 0
 lol. And they all have the same PNW pale skin tone
  • 4 0
 Those are very similar numbers to revel ranger o believe. Angles and travel. Not sure about seatube etc. But that one got crazy good reviews for up and down and more so down. So, is it the Geo? The CBF? Something else?
  • 2 1
 CBF?
"Can't Be F*cked"?
"Cheap to keep. Built to last. Fun to run"?
or what do you mean
  • 1 0
 @taprider: www.revelbikes.com/technology Scroll down for the CBF explanation.
  • 3 0
 Looking at the two - they are super similar geometry-wise, except that the Canyon is around 40mm longer in effective top tube, and has a much higher standover. Seems to me that the seated position would be way less comfortable on the ups, and you'd feel the top tube height when maneuvering and decending. I'd have to imagine that the suspension design and tuning choice would make a big difference decending as well.
  • 1 0
 @emarquar: Yeah but there's just something awesome about the design and rideability of Revel bikes.
  • 5 0
 Would love to hear form the PB evaluators how they feel the 'old school' 2020 Evil Following performs as a 'down country bike' compared to those recently reviewed.....
  • 7 0
 As someone who rode the first Gen, following... I'm not sure it suits the DC title. It's more of a trail bike. Excellent decender and telepathic handling. It's head angle is now pure xc standard... but still not light enough and not focused on the ups... as a DC.
  • 2 0
 It is Evil, a bike for the polar opposite of the off-road bi-cyclist they are talking about in this video.. Smile
  • 1 0
 Thanks for the feedback. Really interested in the V3…
  • 2 0
 @BradleyHewitt: I have a V3. Even though the head angle and travel suggest it…it’s not really a down country bike. It’s a snappy, ripping fun trail bike. Pretty good at technical climbing, decent pedaller (albeit heavy), ferocious at cornering, wants to jump, and wants to descend more than anything.
  • 3 0
 Using the same rear end likely limited Canyon's ability to update the seat angle. And if your body can't move forward at the back, the normal benefits of increased reach become a detriment, as it's just stretching your weight off-balance, instead of allowing your centre of gravity to move forward.

But if the lesson is don't buy half-bikes - why did the Epic Evo work?
  • 1 0
 The Epic Evo was also a compromise with unnecessarily slack SA and shortish reach, not a perfect balance like the Spur (I have reviewed both). Still a good bike with good kinematics and good geometry in the rest of the chart though.

This Canyon's geometry chart reads way worse, even before this review. No good numbers in key areas and an imbalance, being long with steepish HA and slackish SA. I would lever buy a bike with bad geometry or kinematics because it has good parts on it. Hope they redesign it or make a full DC frame.
  • 2 0
 The new sids are ok if you store them upside down. Mine did not feel great when I first got my Ranger but it's great now. I make sure it's stored upside down which is a bit of a hassle but it seems to have stopped the bushing play. Great and very honest review!
  • 1 0
 Same fix here, though I got new lowers on warranty after a couple months. Early '20 produced fork I think. Been good since.
  • 2 0
 LUX CF 6. I have one. Small upgrades done, new carbon wheels ordered. Its definitely XC bike with more travel. 183 cm - size L fits me well - dont like short bikes when climbing, on descents - holds the line pretty well and cornering is better than in previous ROSE Root Miller all mountain bike with 150 mm. If the bike is too big for some just look at geometry of Ghost Lector FS with 45 mm stem and very long reach. Long top tube forces to keep the body low especially on steep climbs. If not the front wheel goes up. Removing spacers and getting the stem down is necessary. No problem on singletracks, have to fiddle a little bit with proper suspension setup to have a proper traction at the rear, at uphills on rough surfaces.
  • 6 0
 Really enjoying the field test content. Good banter. Well done team!
  • 2 0
 It is good but can't help but think it would be better if Kaz didn't seem like he was just given a token spot sitting between the other two asking a few questions. He looks bored just having to listen and not contribute to the reviews. Is he not getting to ride all the bikes as well or was he not there yet when filming was done? I'd rather hear input from all 3 as they have different styles and opinions.
  • 2 0
 @h82crash: levy and Quincey rode/tested these bikes. Kaz is riding the other group of bikes their testing (I think the trail category?)
  • 1 0
 @NERyder: Makes sense. Would still love it if they did them with 3 reviewers, whether these 3 or a combination with the other pb reviewers.
  • 2 0
 @h82crash: I agree. It would have been nice to have a third reviewer with different rider profile or perspective, like maybe Sara
  • 3 0
 Weird geo. Totally out of reach for somebody with my proportions. At 1.78m size S would just fit, wasn't it that de seat post would almost drop out the seat tube due to my somewhat longer legs.
  • 3 0
 @mikelevy, just do a 2022 "1-10 ranked' of all the 120mm forked bikes already! One location, Epic Evo, Revel Ranger, Spur, Scalpel SE, Hei Hei and these bikes you just reviewed.
  • 5 2
 When MVDP came up I was really hoping to see a different picture, maybe one from the olympics? I guess comedy wasn't the priority there.
  • 7 6
 Cringeworthy!
Now that Henry's there, u can relax with the all too American tendency of starting EVERY negative with a positive.
If something sucks, just say it. If something is faulty, dont preface it with "its great, however...".
You're definitely on the right track, and i know you can't go all out with the negativity, but I think you boys are big enough now that u dont need to cringe in your seat every time you get judgemental Smile
  • 1 0
 I love my tesla BUT....
  • 3 0
 @mm732: Hehe, touche.
I'll put it that way- if someone girl ever starts saying to you "You're a really good guy, you're really all a girl can ask for...", you'll get the gist of it before she even continues the sentence.
Bike reviews shouldn't sound like a bad date. If rockshox drops the ball, delivering one faulty fork after another, at a time where you waited 6 months for a bike and god knows how long for a replacement - pinkbike needs to nail them.
If more reviewers did it, maybe we wouldn't still be suffering from top tier Grip2 forks creaking like a cheap mattress. I'm saying this a one who reviewers numerous bikes and is probably guilty of the same wishy washy statements Smile
  • 1 0
 So if you are looking for a more capable XC bike, should you be looking at this or the Blur?

For my kind of riding (long epics, XC-racing, and intervals) a lockout-remote and a lighter dropper is certainly preferable so I'm looking at something like the Orbea Oiz with a 120mm fork or the XC-version of the Blur.
  • 3 0
 Editors: would be nice to get photos of the features that distinguish these bikes, in this case the chain retention and headset.
  • 3 0
 After the glowing review of the Lux from last year, I didn't think Canyon would shit the bed this time.
  • 2 0
 Which is wierd as it is effectively the same bike.. i guess they expected it to be different, and be a trail bike, as the name implies, but it wasnt
  • 3 0
 Im suprised cayon actually offered up this bike to be tested by pinkbike.. seems like an oversight to me
  • 2 0
 They sent one to NSMB, too. Strange choices
  • 2 0
 Why don’t you just come out and say you don’t like “down country bikes” light trail bikes is where it’s at.
  • 2 0
 Sounds like you get what you pay for on this bike, only pro is the price really.
  • 11 9
 PB needs to spend some time out east on rolling terrain and then tell us how great steep seat tube angles are.
  • 1 0
 +1
  • 4 0
 Looks like an XC bike.
  • 1 1
 " It managed to be a very reasonable halfway house between XC-responsiveness and providing a platform that will respond well to large accelerations or shifts in where your weight is sitting. "

What does this mean?
  • 1 0
 you can climb efficiently on saddle position, on some harder steep, difficult uphills you have balance more to shift the weight forward. This bike can descend better that original LUX with 100 mm travel but still can climb very well thx to the same rear triangle.
  • 1 0
 Does this bike come with an ejector button that sends you over the bars, or is that just a pro spec that didn't make it into full production?
  • 2 0
 How about that nose bonk at 12:02? Pretty damn impressive on that bike
  • 2 0
 it's whopping not whipping 650mm for size large
  • 2 1
 I know it has a Flex Pivot rear end, but to actually see the flex in the Seat Stays in the high speed makes me say...NO
  • 1 0
 Henry has a stain on his sweater behind his hands...in the beginning...
says my mother in law Smile
  • 2 0
 I appreciate the blunt assessment at the end Henry
  • 2 0
 When does the Henry and Levy fight video come out??
  • 1 0
 Do yourself a favor and do a review on their warranty as undercover review shoppers.
  • 1 0
 Strange that this bike has completely disappeared from Canyon's line up and is no longer on their website.
  • 1 0
 www.canyon.com/en-sk/mountain-bikes/cross-country-bikes/lux/lux-trail/lux-trail-cf-8/3018.html?dwvar_3018_pv_rahmenfarbe=BU%2FBU
It is available in europe, as of 30.Jan.2022, they have M L in stock, XL possible to order
  • 2 0
 Smuggling what?
  • 2 2
 Slack seat angle a plus!? I guess if your “mountain biking” doesn’t include any mountains……
  • 11 1
 Well I climbed up impossible stuff in the mountains on a 73 deg seat angle Giant Anthem 29er of a few years back. Best climbing bike I ever had and newer longer/slacker/steeper STA bikes only did worse to much worse. Climbing ability depends on a lot more than seat tube angle. Don't believe all the marketing hype, shift your saddle back a bit and get those idling butt and hamstring muscles to work.
  • 3 2
 What am I saying. Climbing is a different thing to most Pinkbike visitors anyway.
  • 2 0
 @jeroenk: I live in the western US. Yeah, I could climb up steep rock slabs on a 73 seat angle bike. And I could descend stuff on a scary steep head angle.

However, that geometry was crap (old klunkers had geometry close to an enduro bike except for slack seat angles-no dropper compromise). 76-78 STA and 75 or so HTA is where it’s at. Even for XC.

I suspect the new Scott Spark is just the first of the proper geometry XC bikes.
  • 3 0
 @wyorider: Don´t forget about the Ghost Lector FS
  • 2 0
 @wyorider:
If you're riding a 75* HA bike down steep, rocky trails you'll be keeping your dentist smiling all the way to the Yeti store.

Yes, I do realize you intended to write "65 or so HTA".
  • 1 0
 Quinney throwing shade I love it love it!!! More more more more more
  • 1 0
 Wow, sounds exciting
  • 1 0
 Confused Country Big Grin
  • 1 4
 That dropper dropped the ball.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.050485
Mobile Version of Website