Schwalbe Eddy Current TyresSchwalbe's new Eddy Current tyre might be eMTB specific but its tread pattern looks like it'll suit downhill applications well. The tyres come in both 275 and 29-inch versions and they have different tread patterns and widths for the front and rear - the front being more suited to cornering and the rear much better at giving grip under acceleration or braking. Both tyres are running super gravity casing so punctures are going to be rarer than thinner-carcass rubber.
The rear is a big, weighty badass looking tyre.
The front tyre's width is a little more conservative
The front tyre's knobs are Minion DHF-esque, running in the same direction as the tyre's rotation. The big, long blocks with ample spacing should provide excellent cornering traction. Although they might not work in the muddiest of conditions, the tyre looks to be beefy enough to give at least some grip when it's wet and boggy. The front tyre we shot is a 29X2.4, which'll have a similar outer circumference to the smaller but fatter rear.
The rear tyre has a much squarer tread pattern than the front, that's best suited to speeding up and braking hard. The rear tyre pictured is a 275X2.8 which sits firmly in 'plus' tyre territory.
Reminiscent of an MX tyre, these knobs are perfect to deal with the braking and acceleration forces that eMTBs can generate. Maybe we'll be seeing the Eddy Currents on DH bikes soon?
Topeak CubiCubi & TubiBoosterTopeak's new modular light system is designed to fit and work around GoPro's Session camera mount - the CubiCubi lights and battery units are the same size as a Session. The lights' batteries are interchangeable and with the biggest battery a single light unit can produce up to 1200 lumens. Adding a second light in the mount you can double your potential output.
The lights are rechargeable with a USB cable or a charging dock. The batteries can also double up as a power bank to charge other USB devices. There are three battery sizes and several mounts available. They're expected to go on sale Autumn 2019 next year and will cost from $99.95.
Topeak's entry into the tubless inflator market seems logical considering their ever-popular JoeBlow track pump. The tubless inflator has a maximum pressure of 200psi, will retail for somewhere between $60 and $70 and should be available in Autumn 2019.
The TubiBooster is Topeak's take on the tubeless inflator canister.
Orange Strange 229Orange's Strange 329 prototype DH bike looks fairly similar to their current DH rig but has been designed and built for 29-inch wheels. Touting a low BB with an 83mm shell, ISCG 05, 150mm rear axle and many other features, it looks like a thoroughbred race bike. It does have a party trick, though. At the bottom of the downtube there's space and mounting points for ballast weights.
These weights help to modify and adjust the sprung to unsprung mass ratio whilst adding weight to the bike in the lowest possible place. This can have several advantages: adding weight to the sprung mass can improve suspension performance - the relative weight of the swing arm to the main frame means that the swing arm's movement has a smaller destabilising effect on the bike's overall ride position. Because there is less potential for destabilisation, the suspension can be more efficient.
Not only that, a heavier bike can ride better on rougher tracks. Once again, applying the same principal of destabilisation, the weightier the bike the less likely it is going to get bucked around on choppy tracks.
Obviously this is an oversimplification of the idea, but Orange appear to be open to applying this idea of adding weights to their do-it-all enduro bikes so that on one day you can pedal and the next you can ride chairlift-assisted bike park on the same bike.
Oh, and the weight mounts use the same spacing as a water bottle!
CatEye Volt 1700Replacing their 1600 model, the Volt 1700 feels lightweight but boasts a 150-hour run time and a max of 1700 lumen output. It uses a cartridge battery so the light's life is only dictated by how many batteries you can carry. It will be supplied with both helmet and bar mounts that are compatible with GoPro's system.
MENTIONS: @orangebikes @schwalbe
www.cmtradelaw.com/2018/03/products-affected-by-section-232-tariffs-on-steel-and-aluminum
Ripples to the global market for metals will eventually make their way into price increases on finished goods. It just won't be as apparent as an instant 25% price hike on everything. Metal manufacturers will need to hedge their prices based on future demand fluctuations.
E-pads?
No respect for that.
Alpinestars has been making products specific to powered bikes for decades!
Embarassing product.
Official kneepad of the World E-Enduro Series?
Nothing to do with actual riding or performance improvements just making money. Bikes and gear are so expensive now people to replace their stuff every year. Thats what happens when bikes are 5,000.00 for what used to cost about 2500.00. If you ride a carbon frame and wheels thank yourself.
singletrackworld.com/2017/11/interview-chris-porter-on-losing-his-mojo-suspension-mtb
You just pedal the bike up the hill of course. . the weights detach and go in your backpack...
It's getting my bike on the roof rack at the end of the day that I struggle with!
That said, I'd say metal if for peasants. I only add high performance carbon composite weights to my bike, because these are lighter.
Can you explain your numbers, I'm a little confused.
Are you saying a 1kg weight reduces will reduce climbing power by 1%. This is about right.
Or are you saying 1%/kg, so 88% change for an 88kg rider. If so, I think you are mixing your drinks a little.
All we are changing by adding 1kg weight is the amount of energy required to get the system, bike plus rider to the top of the hill. So 1kg, for a 100kg system is 1%.
So, with 3kg of water in your pack, do you notice a significant difference in climbing when it is full compared to when it is empty, I doubt it?
Gotta explain it for American readers
So far my testing results are:
1) can not tell any difference riding downhill.
2) might feel a difference uphill.
3)definitely feel a difference lifting the bike on my bike rack.
Maybe because a lighter bike is more responsive and easier to jump...?
That orange must already weight 40+ Pounds... if anybody needs more weight to “improve the ride” it may be time to get a plus bike or some riding lessons.
Now people seem to miss the point of why this bike is called Strange instead of Orange. You can't buy it, it is under development. They built a lightweight bike so that they could play with the weight until they've got it right. Once they've found the number, they know how much they want to add and how to add that in a sensible manner (to reinforce, stiffen or use stronger/heavier components). Don't expect you'll ride the Strange unless you're a tester or journalist. And don't expect that if you get the Orange that is the result of this development, that it will be designed to add weight to. See, Dirt magazine tested this bike and found it light but that it didn't hold its line very well. So that's why they're doing this testing.
Asking for a friend.
dirtmountainbike.com/gear/bike-reviews/downhill-bikes/the-downhill-bike-test-2018-conclusion
The bike was considered too light to hold its line, which is why they are experimenting with how much weight is to be added. Again, this is a Strange, not an Orange. That implies, this is a prototype/testbed, not a production model. Once it hits production (as an Orange), it will be tweaked to have the desired weight (by adding structural material, not just weights).
I always thought this might be helping their racers, particularly Cecile and Myriam (since females tend to weigh less). Metals win medals :>.
pulled from website
It's pretty easy here to see why your average mountain bike enthusiast gets frustrated, bitter, and jaded about the industry.
I guess I'd better put a bag of nuts and bolts in my SWAT hole then.
It's simple mathematics!
Cool!
"Adding a second light in the mount you can double your potential output."
OK, I guess math still works
"They're expected to go on sale Autumn 2019 next year"
What?? We're announcing /lights/, the one product that practically doubles in capability every year or so, more than a year out??
Seriously - they are promoting a product 12 months out???!!!
Really don't understand this... if frequency is such a Thing why not change spring weight/tyre rather than placing (death) weight...
And we're seeing DH weight get closer to Enduro (light bikes)
you weight the bike through your legs.
adding weight to your bike, is close to zero variance. ex: rider weight around 80kg, adding 1 kg will increase overall weight by 1.25%
what really changes adding this weights is reducing the vibration of the frame due to increased inertia.
eg: bike frame weight 3kg, adding 1kg will make 33% difference
it would make more sense arriving to different spring rates to achieve the same
I wish they would look at progressing at some point as they were desirable 10 or more years ago.
I suppose the 222 was the last good (relative) orange that was built that could perform with the fast bikes.
Pinbike editor: "You better add the equivalent weight, they'll only bitch BTL otherwise"
Can you explain:
1)What is direction-specific about that tread?
2)What does "vertically along the tyre" mean?
2. Vertically along the tyre means the knobs run in the same direction as the tyre rotates rather than horizontally across the tyre. Once again check out the rear tyre for context.
Cheers.
Like I say I've nothing against Orange at all just they have been getting a lot of negative attention recently and that new 329 just isn't to my personal taste it's too "erm what's the word"...feminine.
First post.
They’ve got some electricians over at Schwalbe.