A lot of gear comes across our desks here at Pinkbike. Check Out is an occasional round up of everything our tech editors have gotten their hands on. Sometimes it's products we're doing long-term tests on, other times it's stuff we're stoked on but don't have time to fully review. And, sometimes it's crazy stuff someone sent us unsolicited and we're having a laugh.
Jank Components Pump and Beverage Can Holders
Features
• 3D printed • Accepts any a 30-28mm diameter pump • $24.99 - 34.99 USD
• Inline, side-load, and Specialized SWAT box options • Replacement straps available • jankcomponents.com
Jank Components is a rapidly growing 3D printing business hailing from Bellingham that was started out of a desire for some one-off, niche items. "I'm supplying prototypes for the people," says owner Eric Olsen. Those range from a 355 ml beverage holster he thoughtfully personalized for me, to more specific items like fenders for Forbidden bikes and a bleed cup for DVO forks. Ever wonder where to get those tidy clips to keep your cables fastened together? Jank has those "Housing Homies" too. All of the parts are 3D printed with a recyclable thermoplastic polyester (PETG), and shipped in repurposed packaging. Eric turns prototypes and scraps back into usable filament for future pieces too. Looking forward into June, Eric will be donating 50% of the profits from Jank to World Bicycle Relief after gaining inspiration from Lachlan Morton's "Alt Tour".
I was most interested in their Inline pump holder that can quickly bolt to the frequently appearing accessory mount under the top tube of some frames. The clever design of the Inline bracket removes the downtube size constraint and places it out of harm's way under the top tube. There's even another bracket option to secure the pump to the underside of a Specialized SWAT box door. All of the holders use the same O-ring with a locking lever, which are available separately. Got another clever idea? Eric might already make it, or can whip it up for you in between hitting regional enduro races.
5DEV Trail/Enduro Cranks
Features
• 7075-T651 CNC'd billet aluminum • 155-175mm arm lengths • 29 or 30mm spindle diameter • 167mm Q factor
How could you pass by a bike with these cranks and not take notice? The wild cookie-cutter look from the 5DEV Trail/Enduro cranks minimize weight and maximize strength. Based in San Diego, the company began with five axis machining contracts outside of the bike industry, but is riddled with avid mountain bikers who have turned a hobby into a branch of their main business. They aren't afraid to whip up and show off prototypes as they play with various anodizing finishes and colors, like the ones we covered at Sea Otter.
These patent-pending, AI-looking aluminum cranks can be produced at various lengths from 155-175mm in 5mm increments. If you're searching for aftermarket eMTB cranks, 5DEV has models to fit Specialized (excluding SL motors), Bosch, and Shimano spindle patterns too. The three piece crankset uses SRAM DUB or 30mm spindles with eight splines in 68-73mm BB shell widths which give a 167mm Q-factor. To mount their trippy looking Spacely sprocket, which looks like it came off of an 80's era BMX bike, 5DEV chose SRAM's 3-bolt chainring mounting standard for their Trail/Enduro cranks.
Out of the box, self-extracting chromoly hardware, which uses a standard 8mm hex wrench, has the torques wisely laser etched into the bolts, and are prepped with grease. My favorite highlight, aside from the wild looks, has to be the alloy bearing pre-loader which won't degrade from cleaners and will survive even the most zealous bolt torquers. They aren't cheap at $499, but are extremely well finished with smooth threads, no burs or extra material, and come with a 5-year warranty.
Scott Prospect WFS Goggle
Features
• 50mm tall film with mud flap • NoFog™ Anti-Fog lens treatment • MX-rated impact resistant lens with locking system • Silicone grip on strap
• 3-layer molded face foam • 2 extra film rolls included • $120 USD • scott-sports.com
Tear-off strips are fine for motocross riders who require clear vision since they get roosted by any rider in front of them, even in dry conditions, but mountain bikers have different needs. Remember Danny Hart's famous World Championship winning run during the terrifyingly wet and muddy conditions from Champery? Well, he chose a roll-off goggle system for a few reasons, just like the Scott Prospect WORKS Film System (WFS), which use a clear film bound to two spools.
A clean roll of 50mm tall film slides across the field of vision via an easy to locate spring-loaded cord with one swift pull. Thanks to a brim-like flap, there's no way for the water to enter the top of the film and between the lens. This eliminates the blurry vision that occurs when rain gets trapped between tear-offs. They are for very-specific conditions of course, but if you're looking to battle wet weather on your bike park vacation or are gravity racing in horrible conditions, these are a game changer.
As for the Prospect WFS goggles themselves, you can remove the WFS system or add it to existing Prospect goggles with the necessary WFS kit. The roll-off system clips onto the goggle frame while the film is placed into the canister, and slid across and under the mudflap at the top of the lens. It's a tool-free job, although it requires some steady handwork. Other bonuses would be the dual strap tensioners for blind adjustments to snug the cushy, triple layer foam onto your face.
Even in the largest full-face helmets, the outriggers, where the strap attaches to the goggle frame, the Prospect goggles had no problem staying tight against my face. It's worth mentioning that even though the field of vision is wide and the film strip is tall enough, the lens sits far away from your face and has a plastic sheath for the film to slide on. That can be a little distracting, but it's one thousand times better than streaks of water running down between tear-offs or wiping mud spray away with your glove.
Yoshimura Chilao Pedals
Features
• Large size: 110mm (long) x 107.25mm (wide) • 15mm body height at axle • 375 g (claimed and actual)
Yohsimura Cycling is a young division of Yohsimura R&D of America, originally formed from the desire to build high quality Moto GP race engines. Their Chilao pedal comes in two pedal body sizes, with the larger ones shown here, and have a sleek 6061-T6, low-profile body. Inside the heavily CNC'd block are two sealed bearings on the outside of the axle and an IGUS bushing inboard towards the crankarm.
The Chilaos use the most desirable pin design in terms of grip and removal if you ask me. I've tried plenty of flat pedals with their own take on pin style, but I keep coming back to love standard grub screws because they offer exceptional grip without risking a bone graft or catching the lower array on obstacles too often. Maybe it's the threaded pitch that really bites from all sides of the shoe, or the fact that the leading pins under the forefoot and are angled back a touch.
Front to back, the body is on the larger size at 110mm in length and a very precise 107.25mm width. In actuality, the effective pin area is 50mm long on the front half of the axle and 42mm on the backend due to the angular edges, built to glance off of protruding objects. We previously included them in a flat pedal group test, which you can read here. Yoshimura thought to lower the body over the axle and keep two shorter pins in the center to balance grip and concavity. At the center of the body, the area housing the axle stands 15mm tall, while the outer edges are only 13mm. There is a slightly raised 18mm chamfer ramp towards the outer edge that houses the bearing cap which marginally reduces the grip if your foot lands wide of the desired pin area.
Velo Senso Wilson Saddle
Features
• Cut-out shape to reduce tire buzz • 133 and 143mm width options • 243mm long
Velo Saddles churns out 15 million bicycle seats a year with the majority of performance saddles being for the OEM market, however, the Senso Wilson is their own take on alleviating tire buzz when large rear wheels. The cut-out relief at the back of the saddle gives plenty of space for low saddle heights, especially for short legged riders on 29" wheels or long travel bikes. There are two widths available; 133 and 143mm, with an overall length of 243mm. That's nearly 20mm shorter than most saddles, so the narrower choice is a valid option for youth bikes.
We bolted the Senso Wilson onto the Grim Donut V2, which certainly didn't need any clearance due to the massive chainstays, but the flat, short shape works well with steep seat angles that give more of a perched feeling than sitting. Under the grippy top layer of textured rubber is a more trimmed material in the Zone Cut, which helps to relieve any unwanted pressure in the middle of the saddle. It wasn't until I tried the Senso Wilson that I thought too much about the grip needed to pedal in wet conditions, but there is a lot to gain there. Sliding around less, I was able to focus on all the slippery roots and steering the wildly long Grim Donut V2 uphill. I found the 143mm width to be marginally too wide for my seated pedaling position, but it's nice to see wider saddle options available.
So I have a spreadsheet to keep track of the ideas that people send me for Jank. They are organized into two categories. “Dumb” and “not dumb”. The claw cage was solidly in the “dumb” category but I did it anyways because the world needs more chaos.
@HankHank: can confirm will not blow up at the bottom of the trail. I have the beer can holder and did an enduro race with a cold frosty Modelo strapped to it for some mid race rehydration. Stayed on the bike through the chunk and was able to rehydrate after a couple stages.
One time janky Olsen (aka dr Eric) spat in my mouth for good luck before a regional race. I crashed horribly but fell in love with the nurse in the ambulance; we’ve been married since August. Anyways love the components mate hope you start selling saliva soon xoxo
@LDG: agreed. When it comes to parts that are static and non mechanical, it’s never really made sense to me to much extra money. A crank is a solid piece of metal. As long as it’s not excessively heavy or flexy all cranks will generally perform the same. Same goes for things like stems, bars, chainrings, etc.
If extra money is going to be spent it makes much more sense to spend it on mechanical parts like suspension, wheels, brakes, etc. those are areas where better designs and better engineering will improve the bike the most.
If memory serves me right the story goes that chainring was some sort of temporary test mule for something, but then people like it and wanted one. I'm definitely in that latter category, if only I wasn't much too tight to pony up for the cranks and chainring!
@office: Of course, you are right about that. When I said they were a "solid piece of metal" I was referring in this case to its functionality, not its construction. Meaning crank arms are just a static component, with no moving parts.
Sure did knock it out of the park with that open sided torsionally efficient structure......
Wait no that's the opposite. Looks cool, actually shit mechanical design. If you just insist on cncing everything, make some hologram style bonded cranks, they're simply the most efficient structure for aluminium cranks.
I recall another euro company actually making them now.
I've been looking for something (Other than my hand) could hold a beer til the end of a ride on a 90 degree day (exposed to the world) and then keep that hot beer shaken constantly for atleast 45 min at a minimum so that I could enjoy a bukkake like moment at the end of my ride...thank you.
During the winter in Bellingham we have to rush up the hill so that our beer doesn’t freeze. Then we quickly consume the ice-cold beverage at the top to restore feeling to our fingers and toes.
@ericolsen: on rare occasion it's like that in NC, but it's more like this past week when we had the heat on in our house when the low was 38 at night and then had to crank the AC when it was high of 83....48 hrs later
@ericolsen: Ah I never thought about that. I live somewhere mild so the thought of any kind of fizzy beverage mounted on my bike is going to fizz out more than what I'll get to drink. Even buried deep in my Camelbak. But I guess the cold might mitigate that.
I feel like 5dev is anticipating a new lowrider mountain bike market. I’m not sure if I’m ready for it entirely, but am excited about the prospect of getting wheels with spike counts above 24.
I’m sure they’re way stronger than the AC cranks (ones at shops I worked at had a 100% fail rate) but they’d be stronger/lighter if they were a hollow tubular construction.
I guess if you want a heavier set of cranks that look steampunk, have at it!!
You realize that "5DEV is a division of 5th Axis, a world leader in manufacturing complex components for the aerospace and medical industries"... I think they know what they're doing.
I’m sure these won’t break. I’m also sure they’re heavier and/or less stiff than an XTR or Cane Creek crankset.
These were built to a design spec (to look a certain way) first, to meet engineering metrics second.
So if you can and want to overpay for a part that looks cool above optimum functionality-I’m sure these will fit the bill for your ride to the coffee shop where you can tell everyone about them.
@wyorider: if you look at the backside of a forged GX crank you can see where they got all their design inspiration from. Same pattern. They should have copied some Hollowgrams instead and did 24mm axle so all the people with bb92 had cool options.
@wyorider: This is misleading. Hollow structures are stronger given a fixed amount of material and a variable cross section. If you have a fixed cross section, a solid member would always beat a hollow member.
@jaj23: hahahaha I am slowly understanding the absolute trust people who don't have the knowledge place in people labelled 'experts', it happened so much through COVID, blind following.
@wyorider: if you're going to make engineering statements, get it right. A circle is the most torsionally stiff structure for the amount of material; they're not 'the strongest'.
@davemays: I think all of these posts about which is stronger are really missing the point, which is that that cranks like XT, SLX, or saint more than strong enough for the 99.9999% of the riders out there. So the even if these designs are stronger, does it really matter? Abs is it worth paying 3-4x the price for anything other than looks?
Seriously... 3d printed bottle cage for 35 dollar... an ender 3 pro costs about 200 dollar, 10-20 dollar for filament.... so that means that I could break even after selling 6 bottle cages... cmon jank thats a joke...
and for those of you who aren't into CAD, or just to lazy, go to thingiverse, type bottle cage, slice it and let the printer do the work...
but I have to admit, that those cable holder are pretty interesting, nice idea to make but that finish...
You do know that roll offs have just come across from MX, they’re not something new for MTB? Plus a lot of MX races are banning tear offs for the litter they cause.
aluminum cranks can be really good
cannondale's hollowgram cranks with a stages powermeter, spindle, and chainring are 116 grams lighter and much cheaper than the equivalent sram xx1 cranks with the quarq spider based powermeter.
I really like those 5DEV cranks but I would worry about pedal strikes on rocks here in AZ. My SRAM dub cranks are so beat up now.
They sure are pretty though!
I have 2 pairs of 5 devs and they hold up way better than any other cranks on rock strikes on the rare occasions you have them. They machine more material off the end of the crank past where your pedal bolts in so youre more likely to make contact with your pedal before the cranks even hit. Highly recommend after thrashing them in the rocks and roots of New England
"Ever wonder where to get those tidy clips to keep your cables fastened together? " I did wonder once. And then I ordered them from a bike store. jagwire.com/products/small-parts/rotating-s-hook
Beverage holder needs some serious refinement before it makes any sort of impact imo, but I like the entrepreneurial spirit. I'd be in the market for one of these on my trail-duro rig... Mostly because my frame barely holds a 16oz bottle, so a 12oz beer seems much more doable.
I genuinely hope a beer-can holder that I 3d print in my garage never makes any sort of “impact” on the mtb world. Otherwise everything I hold sacred will have been a lie.
You aren't required to buy everything you see. If you keep going to websites that try to sell you stuff....people are gonna keep trying to sell you stuff.
Just say no.
Bro the brand name is literally Jank. You’re German so I’m gonna give you the benefit of the doubt that you didn’t get the joke. Also if you have a way better printer I encourage you to take over my European business! I’ll license the designs to you! The fact that I have people paying shipping to Germany for these is actually insane and counter to the benefits of 3d printing.
www.instagram.com/p/CU00GqIP03C/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y
If extra money is going to be spent it makes much more sense to spend it on mechanical parts like suspension, wheels, brakes, etc. those are areas where better designs and better engineering will improve the bike the most.
That said, they look cool.
I’d be curious to see what 5 Dev’s take on a chain link steering wheel and ape hanger bars would be……
I’m sure they’re way stronger than the AC cranks (ones at shops I worked at had a 100% fail rate) but they’d be stronger/lighter if they were a hollow tubular construction.
I guess if you want a heavier set of cranks that look steampunk, have at it!!
I’m sure these won’t break. I’m also sure they’re heavier and/or less stiff than an XTR or Cane Creek crankset.
These were built to a design spec (to look a certain way) first, to meet engineering metrics second.
So if you can and want to overpay for a part that looks cool above optimum functionality-I’m sure these will fit the bill for your ride to the coffee shop where you can tell everyone about them.
it doesnt matter what their credentials are
I am slowly understanding the absolute trust people who don't have the knowledge place in people labelled 'experts', it happened so much through COVID, blind following.
Seen a tube bridge beam lately?
Plus a lot of MX races are banning tear offs for the litter they cause.
(It could have been someone else as was somewhere between 2005 and 2012ish)