Three-time Olympian. Fifteen-time National Champ. World Cup winner. BC Bike Race winner... Enduro racer? Geoff Kabush has a résumé that any cross-country athlete would happily trade their power-meter for, but the Canadian is again branching out to a very different kind of racing aboard Yeti's new SB130, a 130mm-travel trail bike that he's spec'd to fit his enduro needs.
Geoff's machine has been built to suit his strengths: fitness and covering ground as fast as possible. That means that rather than going for a longer travel, slacker, and heavier enduro-specific setup like
the equally-new SB150, Kabush's SB130 has been assembled with a mix of relatively lightweight but enduro-friendly parts. Total weight: Geoff doesn't give a damn.
Bike DetailsIntended use: trail / enduro
Travel: 130mm
Fork travel: 160mm
Wheel size: 29''
Frame construction: carbon fiber
Head angle: approx. 65-degrees
Seat tube angle: 77-degrees
Size: extra-large
www.yeticycles.com Kabush's SB130 is setup for the Trans-Cascadia, an enduro race in the Pacific Northwest that sends riders down timed stages that they've never seen before.
With over two decades of top-level cross-country racing behind him that kicked off in 1995 with his first World Championship event as a junior, the forty-one-year-old Kabush likely has far more racing experience than most of the people reading this. That sort of practical knowledge led him to choose the SB130 platform over the more enduro-focused SB150 for the Trans-Cascadia, a four-day enduro stage race that sees competitors fly down trails they've never seen before. If it were me who was racing blind, I'd want some squishy, slack, and forgiving to save my ass.
But not Geoff.
''There's the option to get the big SB150, but the SB130 is a nice compromise in general,'' he said of his bike choice. ''It's been a bit more physical pedaling down in Oregon, and I don't really know where we're going, but this will likely be a good compromise.'' Sure, but with a motor that can probably push out more watts for longer than most, if not all, of his enduro competitors, why not take the weight penalty for a bit of extra travel, more relaxed geometry, and more room for error? ''I guess I'm not as confident in my fitness advantage,'' he replied with a laugh. ''I've always enjoyed that part of racing, the figuring out of equipment and taking risks. I mean, there's going to be some super-high-level guys there; Francois Bailly-Maitre is coming, and his performance at the BC Bike race was... It's no joke how fit that guy is.''
Bailly-Maitre usually focuses on enduro events but finished second overall behind Kabush at this year's BC Bike Race, and Kabush is the two-time Trans-Cascadia defending champ, so we might be treated to a hell of a battle.
The new SB130 still uses Yeti's Switch Infinity system, but a revised shape to the frame allows riders to mount a bottle under the shock. I assume that Geoff is happy about this.
Geoff might have chosen a shorter-travel bike than many other racers will be on, but he has made one important change: The SB130 sells with a 150mm-stroke Fox 36 up front, but he's gone for 160mm slider instead. ''Yeah, a little more forgiveness,'' he said of the reasoning for his fork choice. ''Typical of their lunch ride, a lot of guys at Yeti put a little more travel up front, and I'm going to be racing it at a blind enduro at Trans-Cascadia. So it's always nice to have a little more on the front-end, and I've got the big 203mm rotor up front for those emergencies, too.''
The SB130 is rocking a 65.5-degree head angle with the stock 150mm 36, but the extra 10mm up front will slacken it out by a bit less than half of a degree, which isn't exactly a bad thing when you're blindly tossing yourself into roots, rocks, and God knows what. Out back, there's a Fox DPX2 with the stock tune, although Kabush did mention that he's looking forward to trying the SB130 with the more adjustable Float X2 shock as well.
Kabush might be far from the gram-geek that a lot of pro-level cross-country bandits are, but his roots still show in the carbon Stan's Arch CB7 29er rims (26mm internal width, 475-grams) that were on his SB130 when I shot it during Crankworx. ''I've been running carbon wheels on all my bikes,'' the Yeti racer explained before this caveat: ''Because it's four days of racing at the Trans-Cascadia, I might put on some aluminum rims. I might take the conservative option for a four-day race.'' Remember, you can usually pull the dents out of an alloy rim, whereas a carbon hoop might need less attention but can also turn into a bunch of pieces of useless carbon fiber in a worst-case scenario.
| Throughout my career, I've always been more concerned with stuff that works, whether it was being an early adopter to thru-axle forks, or disc brakes. My biggest concern is that it works and is reliable, and I know the guys are making it as light as they can.—Geoff Kabush |
How does one choose tires for a race where they don't know the trails? You go with what you do know, of course, and that sees Kabush on Maxxis' Aggressor out back and a Minion DHF up front, both in the mid-weight EXO casing. In my mind, a lot of enduro events call for true downhill rubber, but the Canadian isn't so sure: ''Right now, I'm running EXO [casing tires]. That's usually good enough for me, but I've been talking to the Maxxis guys and they've just released the EXO+, so I'm looking at the timeline to see if I could get a couple of those for enhanced protection.''
The '+' designation means that there's about 80-grams more protection in the tire's sidewall, whereas a Double Down can add between 200 and 250-grams over an EXO casing tire.
The Canadian racer had a set of Stan's Arch CB7 carbon rims on when I shot the bike, but he'll likely be running a set of aluminum Flow MK3 rims at the Trans-Cascadia.
But what if the course points riders down some seriously rocky shit? ''Probably the Double Down [casing],'' he answered, nixing the idea of using tire inserts. ''Coming from my cross-country background, I'm used to managing my tires and, generally, at the blind enduros you're not pushing as hard, just because you never know what's coming. Especially because I'll probably be running the 2.5s, which have the air volume, so if it gets a bit rocky, I might just adjust the pressures.'' Geoff will run anywhere between 20psi and 25psi, depending on the terrain and conditions.
With the Trans-Cascadia still a ways out when I cornered Geoff and his SB130, the bike's spec could change come race day. For now, Kabush is running last year's XTR group with a tiny bolt-on guide from OneUp for some extra insurance, as well as OneUp's EDC tool stashed in the steerer tube of his fork.
It's last year's XTR all around for Kabush, including a 200mm rotor up front. The new XTR 9100 is rarer than barends on an enduro bike.
So, how much does all that add up to? Geoff isn't sure, and he's not too fussed about weight, either. ''Throughout my career, I've always been more concerned with stuff that works, whether it was being an early adopter to thru-axle forks, or disc brakes,'' he said, countering my weight weenie jokes. ''My biggest concern is that it works and is reliable, and I know the guys are making it as light as they can.''
Kabush knows that his days of World Cup action are behind him, and he's switched his focus to multi-day stage races like the BC Bike Race and the upcoming Trans-Cascadia. But does that mean his training has been switched up, too? ''I'm racing a ton and adding stage races to the mix, so I'm obviously still working hard in the winter, but once the seasons comes on, the racing is training. I can count on one or two hands the number of specific workouts I've done since the season started. These days, I'd rather jump into some fun events for my training.'' Fewer intervals and more fun for Kabush, it seems, which is in-line with his ''Keep riding until the fun stops'' motto.
What about some enduro specific training? ''No, I think it's mostly just getting as comfortable as I can on the bike, and especially for the blind races. You want to be really comfortable and know how the bike is going to react. When I come back to BC, I'll just do a lot of trail riding; there's not a lot of road riding here. I don't even have a curly-bar bike up here right now. These days, it's just about trying to stay fresh and healthy between races.''
I’ll take a 150 though cuz I want a little extra cushion when I get off line going faster than I should be or blindly launching down some rocks deep in the high country a long long way from help. I have a wife and kids to support and I’ll give up a little snap in favor of a little more room for foolishness, laughing all the way!
The most notable item that had to be replaced was the seatpost which had been cut as short as could still work...and milled out to remove material. Yeah, I think he cared about weight, ha ha. This was XC however and they tend to be a bit more obsessive I think.
I ended up doing a pretty sweet custom paint job on the bike and fork then snapped the top tube bunny hopping a curb.
So well you are still an Average Trail warrior whatever you ride and changing it to a smaller bike doesn't make you any less average. it just makes you a dude with a bike that has less travel. Might as well have kept the big bike.
The points of reference of folks who constantly look for a new reason to buy a new bike, is completely skewed. No 160 bije is not too big and no 130 bike will never make you a pedalling God, at least not as long as you keep the same setup as on 160 bike which is vast majority of cases. If you really want “feedback” and live as far from EWS style trails as it gets, then get a XC bike and upfork it slightly. Maybe get a hardtail.
CHEERS McNubbin
At least I have a penis. You just have holes like Trump. Bum holes to be precise. Best keep the top level one shut.
If you've ever tried to pop off any extra credit lines on your trails, 30mm of suspension makes night and day difference. I'm glad you're happy with your bike, but can you stop bringing it up like it's the only option for the next few months? Shit got old a year ago.
You sound like someone that knows enough to be dangerous, but not enough to be helpful...
Understand that we all ride for different reasons, and maybe some of us have far more years of experience to know what we want. I dig the fact that you feel you have to post on absolutely everything, I’m sure it makes you feel knowledgeable and empowered. But understand, I don’t know what trail conditions you have and you don’t know the trail conditions others have, so insisting any bike or piece of equipment is dumb or unneeded is kind of moronic and immature.
I think this is the first time in 5-6 years I’ve posted here. Personally, a 130/150 29er can handle just about any trail near me. Unless you’re hucking to flat off 10 foot drops I’d think a bike like this would be more than capable of anything you (or most people here) could throw at it.
At the end of the day, buy what you want. If you want me to make you feel stupid tell me about the bikes you own and the trails you ride... I’m 100% sure I have a friend nearby that has ridden them faster on an Xc bike. I also know 60 year old XC racers who will crush you up and down the mountain regardless of the trail or bike.
What is this perfect bike that you own that entitles you to trash talk literally everything else? And are you any kind of pro athlete or a guy with a sponsorship whose opinion could matter?
So, while opinions are cool and fun, don’t tell people they’re dumb for what they like in a bike. Just shut up and ride. Literally, none of your opinions have ever been valid or insightful... ever. You are a new rider, you’re probably 22 or 23, and I’d imagine you are fairly specific in the niche you ride. So, just stop. You don’t know anything kid, there’s no point in you posting on everything that doesn’t pertain to you.
I've noticed in the last few years we've gone away from noting actual seat tube angles. It seems like manufacturers want to brag about their effective ones instead. This is a disservice to riders, but particularly to tall ones. With the recent focus returning to at least some rider's preference for steep seat tubes, can we get back to including both?
Cause that would be absolutely ignorant to ignore the cost of production when selling a product.
Rocky Mountain Altitude... Sooooo fun!
Some of us are not fortunate enough to have N + 1 bike...
Iv been scratching my head on the tire choice for this event?
Trans-Cascadia told us " A front mud spike and aggressive rear tread would not be a bad choice. Beefier tire casing is a good idea."
I was thinking Shorty front and back... Assegai front, shorty back or DHF....if possible Double down or DH casing for the rear EXO in the front. The agressor is a great tire, but not shure if its a good choice for loam and mud ?
He* will be fine on that bike. Might be a bit rough on Tongue Mt and other portions of Juniper Ridge but it will be nothing like a typical EWS chunk course. And there should be lots of opportunities to put power down.
*Obviously Geoff will be fine regardless, I'm speaking more generically on bike choice for this event.
And I'm running less than SB130....I'm more like SB85
>wont shut up about weight.
Everything is fine in Shimano land. No production problems here! Hope this isn’t because they have to redesign the brakes again. At this rate you will be able to buy XT from your local grey market importer in March of 2022.
Jokers they are, real jokers.