Words: Marcus Honey
Anthony Shelly is a 16 year old downhill racer. Growing up in Whistler, he is no stranger to the bike park. He's been showcased in Anthill Films' "Return to Earth", and is currently finishing up a phenomenal race season here in BC. So far, Anthony has had six top-3 races this summer, including three 1st place finishes. We shot this video this past August between his race events. Wish him luck as he rolls into the final BC Cup event in Sunshine Coast this weekend!
That's gatekeeping dumbass.
Your comment was ironic in the context of this thread, but your comment stands alone as gatekeeping.
You are a case in point for the second sentence, for sure.
Correct. The part where you say which people have it right is gatekeeping.
"And none of you have answered the question either"
None of us are interested in the question, nor are you entitled to an answer to your question. We wanted to focus on the gatekeeping. But if you want an answer, it's evidently a popular genre of music among people who make mountain bike content, if you don't like it you should produce your own content since you know what's right and wrong.
Your last sentence is ableism, unless you don't know its meaning, which would not surprise me.
If your level of political comprehension is that of a bootlicker, no wonder your comprehension of anything else is non-existent lol
While apostrophes don't make nouns plural, you do use them to make the possessive case a plural noun.
In this case if we are talking about times set by plural pros, it would be the "pros' times"
But anyway, talented kid and cool video
"The times set by (ie in possession of) plural pros"...
You said "of course they do".
You are wrong.
They do not have anything to do with the plural, they convey the possessive part only. Remove the apostrophe and you still have a plural (just simply one which isn't possessive, and thus the sentence isn't grammatically correct).
I never said that the apostrophe makes it a plural, I said it makes it possessive, including for plurals.
Dust said that “apostrophes never have anything to do with plurals”, and I was making the point that well apostrophes do “sometimes have something” to do with plurals, not that they make it a plural, but when they’re making plurals possessive.
Perhaps I was being overly pedantic with the phrase “never had anything to do with” and that’s caused this confusion…
He said "apostrophes never have anything to do with the plural"
You said "of course they do".
You then went on to explain something completely different. The apostrophe in your example has NOTHING to do with plurality, it ONLY has something to do with the possessiveness.
If you're going to be pedantic you'd better be correct.
What is that umpire vest thing he’s wearing?
I can’t see anymore.