A recent article in the
Denver Post has brought mainstream media attention to an issue that first arose last fall, when word began to spread that USA Cycling, the governing body of competitive cycling in the United States, would be enforcing UCI rule 1.2.019, which reads,
| No licence holder may participate in an event that has not been included on a national, continental or world calendar or that has not been recognised by a national federation, a continental confederation or the UCI.[/Quoten] The punishment for breaking this rule? According to section 1.2.021, [Quoten]Breaches of articles 1.2.019 or 1.2.020 shall render the licence holder liable to one month's suspension and a fine of CHF 50 to 100. |
What does this mean in plain English? Say you're a professional cyclist with a month or two of down time before the race season really gets going. To maintain fitness, you enter a small local race in your hometown. No big deal, right? It's just a little race, and the fans all seem excited to have a big name pro show up at their humble event. Well, by the logic of USA Cycling, if the race is not sanctioned by them or the UCI, then you're in violation of rule 1.2.019 and subject to a one month suspension and a fine. Now, while the fine itself is fairly minimal, serving a month long suspension during race season is not a trivial matter, especially for a professional cyclist. This isn't a new rule, but until recently it had not been enforced. In fact, if USA Cycling wanted, they could make it so they wouldn't need to enforce the rule at all. The next line of UCI rule 1.2.019 says, “A national federation may grant special exceptions for races or particular events run in its own country.” It wouldn't be hard for USA Cycling to issue a ruling that says professionals can compete in unsanctioned events, thereby avoiding this whole issue, and the associated bad taste it leaves in everyone's mouth.
Josh Carlson rides for the Giant Factory Off-Road Team, yet does not appear on an official UCI team roster, allowing him to race unsanctioned events.
There does seem to be a workaround to the ruling, one that several teams have taken advantage of. In an interview with
Cyclingnews, USA Cycling Director of Communications Bill Kellick said, “It is important to note that the only riders that are affected are riders that have registered with the UCI on a UCI team. This does not affect mountain bike pro riders who are NOT on UCI-registered teams." For that reason, several teams have modified their roster to give athletes more flexibility in the events they participate in. For example, Adam Craig, Josh Carlson, Carl Decker and Kelli Emmit all ride for the Giant Factory Off-Road team, while Jeremy Horgan-Kobelski and Heather Irmiger ride for Trek, yet none of these individuals appear on the official UCI team roster. This allows them to participate in enduro races or other events that may not be sanctioned by the UCI. However, riders on a UCI team are still not allowed to compete in unsanctioned races. Do you dream of having Aaron Gwin or Neko Mullaly show up at your local downhill or enduro race? If it's not sanctioned by the UCI or USA Cycling, that's not going to happen.
Wanna race? If you're on a UCI team, make sure it's sanctioned, or risk a month long suspension
Grassroots racing has always been a part of mountain biking, and should be allowed to flourish, not stifled with unnecessary rules. It's good for the sport if professional cyclists are allowed to show up at unsanctioned races - amateurs get to mingle with their heroes, and draw inspiration from the riding skills they are sure to witness during a race. It's not as if riders are suddenly going to abandon the entire World Cup circuit to race unsanctioned races – there's not enough media coverage or prize money to make this a worthwhile endeavor. By punishing racers for doing their job – racing – USA Cycling ends up looking foolish, like a jilted lover crashing a wedding. One of USA Cycling's stated goals is to grow competitive cycling in America – enforcing rule 1.2.019 is not the way to accomplish this.
-Mike Kazimer
i cant see a reason that this would be benificial to anybody or indeed the sport as a whole, as far as i can tell someone at the uci was sitting at their desk boored and needed to make it look like they were actually doing something so started adding rules for the hell of it!!
This annoys me more then rock shox new vivid pro only rule.
Did all these big names just decide to start acting like nazis all at the same time?
They don't actually care about people competing in local fun races... but what they do care about is competition. They do not want another organization popping up that would compete with UCI... so they basically tell their riders "you're either with us, or with them". People watch races for the riders in them... races aren't as exciting without the best riders, and as of right now, the best riders are with the UCI (or many of them are).
Other sports do the same thing... NHL players can't go play in the CHL (at the same time) and shit like that. The rule is really dumb in either case.
If anything the rule should be "If you are a registered member of the UCI, you are not allowed to race in an unsanctioned event if it overlaps with an official UCI event (that's in your category)".
It's still kind of a dick move, but it's at least somewhat better.
But on the other hand, this rule is complete sh*t because not everyone fan go to crankworx or colorado freeride festival to see their idols but last year cedric gracia came in october to a event nearby and I think it's great and putting a ban on that seems stupid...
Dont forget that DH is only a small part of the UCI. Road cycling has a lot of pro circuits and a lot more than 7 races, there 's the pro tour, the continental pro tour, the world tour and a lot of single day classics. Rules and regulations apply to everyone.
Blatant attempt to undermine any 'rival' series instead of accepting the competition or working together for the good of cycling as a whole in my opinion
Wat happens now when "pro's" get invited to ride with, race with and inspire future athletes and grass roots riders... "i'm sorry rule number 1.2.019 says you are not free to help the next generation" What a load of Crap! Us pro riders would not be where we are without help and influence from a previous generation.
My suggestion is change it back and leave the UCI alone to their destructive ways, the moment they start recruiting multiple national federations in to their twisted way of thinking is bad news for us all.
This made me chuckle in the morning.
also this 24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lt9ju4dN5g1qzcfxzo1_1280.jpg
Most athletes here are calling their bluff and standing up to it. USAC wants to enforce it because that will force race promoters to sanction their races with the USAC, if they want the big name pros to attend and bring in sponsorship money, also generating lots of revenue in one day licenses from non pro's and locals. A couple big pro's in a local series usually boosts attendance in racers and spectators which means more money. USAC want's that piece of the pie.
Think about how much money they're losing in licenses and promoter fees for an event like Cross Crusade in Portland, sanctioned by OBRA (Oregon Bicycle Racing Association), where there's and average of 1500 CX racers every sunday for 8 weeks. Oregon XC mtb series will see up to a thousand racers at some events, also OBRA, half of those will be cheap one day licenses in Oregon, $5, where with USAC it could be up to $60 for that license. So, USAC loses big time by not having our money, so in exchange, they say UCI and USAC licensed pro's cant race in our races...
Talk about tactics... Effing lame.
"USA Cycling’s Johnson counters that adherence to the rule is simply about respecting the international structure of the sport.
“The UCI have specific regulations designed to protect the integrity and value of the international calendar,” he said. “The fact is these riders have equity that was earned by their international competition. Now if a local organizer wants the pros at their event because they are recognizable individuals as a result of their international competition experience, they should be part of the system that helped create that value.”
Let`s hope they don`t end up in bed with UCI and RedBollocks:
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1ZFeRvGdrrI!
2) the mtb race scene sucks. It is a back water that remains woefully under developed, from the complete absence of a network of racing clubs, to the lack of organization in the grass roots racing,.to the lack of meaningful national race series in the USA, to the lack of development channels for elite riders, to the plain lack of prize money for "pro" riders... I love mtb racing, and the events, but seriously... It's a joke... Coming from road racing, managing a uci team,.and promoting a big race for 3 years I can tell you, by comparison I don't know how we have any good mtb.athletes at all coming out of the USA... It's just pure dumb luck... Any good cat 1 crit racer has better sponsorship and makes more prize money than your average USA based pro mtb racer in any discipline.
We could complain and over react to stuff, or we could figure out why or race scene is lame and make it better.
Road racing has more bullshit rules and the racing scene is excellent and full of opportunity, and completely driven by the membership and their clubs (grassroots).
I don't know what the answer is, but I don't think it has to do with the uci...
And I wonder why that is? Oh right, uci says they cant.
If theres a pro(s) in your scene of racing than the more people and the bettet the scene will become.. my old track had 3 pros at one point and was an absolute blast. I moved to a different place with different tracks and almost no.pros, the scene is shit.
It all depends who rides, and with that being controlled jealously by uci........... we're unfortunately screwed as there are just too many non-uci race clubs.
It doesn't take much to be pro, but to be a big name pro.....
I can't really put it into words on the internet though so there goes that attempt.
Slowest rider in Canada can be 17 and turn Junior Elite (AKA Pro)... To be a sucsessful pro takes dedication. But when did I say it doesn't take much to be a good pro ? I never did.
You don't have to be fast, good, talented, have a nice bike, be sponsored or shit all to be Pro. Therfor, it doesn't take much....
Anyone can Liscence themselves as a pro. Dedicated or not, fast or not, sponsored or not.
Does it take a lot to be pro ? No.
Does it take a lot to be a world renown top pro ? Absolutely. But if you hadn't jumped the gun, you would realize I'm not talking about those guys and girls.
I'm talking the kid that wants that title of junior, elite, or masters. And all it takes is a tick of a check box on your Liscence application and your now a "pro" classified rider. That doesn't take much.
As far as I'm concerned if you can't understand what I'm trying to say after this, it's a lost cause and I'm not going to bother.
That's why we're offering rainbow striped jerseys in all categories at this year's Breck Epic - 'cuz, you know - in recognition of CO finally approving civil unions and same sex marriages.
When are the governing bodies going to realize that not appearing to be complete DOUCHERS is far more monetizable than the reverse?
I had a mavic deemax shirt once that said "rules are made to be broken". I hope no one follows these bs rules.
Also define race. Is a little contest at the local pumptrack considered to be a 'race' as in this article? (size) Or a bigger freestyle bmx contest when you are a pro level road cyclist? (relevance).
Mountain biking is supposed to be about freedom, creativity and enjoyment. Governing bodies like the UCI and others just "F" it up for everyone.
If the bigger companies that spend loads of money on supporting riders and events through sponsorship and tech attendance, decided to utilize the financial power they have by supporting new, non sanctioned events, worked with media to generate content and coverage on those events and had the riders and teams attend the given events.... I think this whole thing would be a non issue really.
IMO...UCI, USA Cycling and any other governing body do not create the value.....The riders attending the events,the companies filling out the tech area's and the coverage of the events is the value.
I am a former World Cup rider that is now in a Brand Manager/Marketing position as well as promoting my own series of Enduro's in So Cal. and the key for me is exposure.
It is not very important who the promoter of the event is...As long as it's professionally done, the riders are having a good time (meaning the event will organically grow) and exposure is generated.
The biggest issue I see in the states is having a professional series that is truly national...we just don't have it.
UCI and USA Cycling currently have the best attended by top Pro rider events.
As an industry we have elevated these current series to the status they are at....Meaning it can be done with others.
I think it would only take a few big companies to shift event sponsorship and attendance from events and pull riders form the given series for a big shift to happen.
We actually did it with Norba....Anybody remember how almost over night the Deer Valley tech area went from overflowing to only needing the top lot.
If any of these "BRILIANT" people within the UCI or USA cycling would study basic marketing they may learn that competition actually brings MORE people in overall. Maybe you have a smaller slice but is becomes a much larger pie.
A old Chinese saying is that you can poke a dog so many times before he bites you, and goes away???
Who knows who's next is my point I guess. Hell, probably Canada...
As you can imagine, the local bike scene isn't massive, with just 30 - 40 mtb events per year ( which are 90 % aimed at amateurs, with no UCI clasification ) and way less in road cycling. Furthermore, the federation is run by some incompetent dudes who are not interestesd in developing cycling, but use their position to serve certain obscure interests.
There are , obviously, just a handful of pro's who have a UCI license but used local races for the prizes and training. Now they are left without solution and have to look outside Ro for races, and amateurs are left without examples to follow on the trail .
All Top 50 pros (or just US pros) should all race in an unsanctioned race before the World Cup starts.
Are there benefits to being a UCI team, other than the team cup? Maybe something to do with amount of support you're allowed at races?
Also, does this incude strava?
The big racing organizations do not want more organizations to start popping up, causing at some point, racers be forced to decide between multiple events. If all the best racers are spread out between multiple races durring the same time period, imagine how difficult it would be to follow the sport!
I expect negative props but I think that this is benificial to the fans and viewers. If there are more organizations there is more contest between those organizations to get riders to attend.
I do however agree that it is overkill to make it illegal for riders to participate in small, local races. It is a bureaucracy made up of business men who have interest in the sport but have the cloud of business hanging over them none the less.
I guess if you break this rule you are also out of chance to buy the new Vivid
well said.