I know exactly what you mean. Every time I read these threads I start chomping at the bit to get out in the garage. I was in an electronics surplus store the other day and saw some linear slide components (I'm currently building a 3D printer) that I thought would be perfect for building a transmission. If you used a fast pitch lead screw to shift the chain across the gears you could get rid of all the pulleys that are shown in the phaser transmission. It would greatly simplify it and make it more compact. Packaging is always going to be tough on a bike of this type.
I sketched up a couple of bike designs some time ago. The first one would use a derailleur type transmission and the second would use a gear hub (Alfine) that sits in front of a large backbone type frame. The problem that I have with gear hub bikes is that I don't like the width of the overall bike. I'd also like to make it as light as possible. I used a pull shock just because I have one and I thought it would be neat. You can get adjustable ride height and variable compression curve and no linkage is necessary. Simple and light. Of course it could be built with a standard compression shock and linkage assembly.
Where are you getting the pull shock from? Or did you grab it off an older bike? Aside from the occasional scott you really don't see any around anymore, especially pull-coils.
how much clearance do you have with a 83mm BB?... cause the alfine rear hub is 185mm (with the lock nut) or, can you change the lock nuts and maybe mod the axle? to make a "gearbox" bike
my FSA gravity moto x have only 140mm of clearance (73mm BB + chain line spacer + chainguide)
how much clearance do you have with a 83mm BB?... cause the alfine rear hub is 185mm (with the lock nut) or, can you change the lock nuts and maybe mod the axle? to make a "gearbox" bike
my FSA gravity moto x have only 140mm of clearance (73mm BB + chain line spacer + chainguide)
185mm?! How on earth does anyone expect that to fit in a frame then?
A standard hub is 135mm wide between the dropouts, right? Why would you include locknuts on top of that standard width, you're not forced to use the same locknuts if you're mounting it as a gearbox in a frame?
Where are you getting the pull shock from? Or did you grab it off an older bike? Aside from the occasional scott you really don't see any around anymore, especially pull-coils.
It's the same pull shock that Yeti used on the Lawwill bikes. When I worked in the bike industry as a designer I was friends with a guy that was an engineer at RockShox- he custom built it for me.
The biggest issue with pull shocks is that they require a lot of space. There are some advantages to through shaft damper construction as they don't require a floating piston since the internal volume doesn't change as the shaft moves through the damper body. Both Ohlins and Sachs use through shaft dampers on their high end motorsport dampers. It would be neat to build a high end pull shock using the latest technology. Ideally I'd like to build a longer travel shock so I could lower the leverage ratio- right now it starts at 3.26:1 and ends at 3.04:1 which is as high as I'd ever want it. A 2.7:1 to 2.5:1 range would be much more ideal.