Polygon may not be a familiar brand for most riders, but the Indonesian company's sponsorship of the Hutchinson UR team has helped them gain increased recognition, at least with followers of World Cup DH racing. Polygon has also been working to expand their higher end offerings, which includes the Collosus N9, a bike we first saw in prototype form at the 2013 Taipei Cycle show. The futuristic-looking shape of the carbon fiber frame is certainly unlike anything currently on the market, and elicited numerous comments, usually involving aliens and outer space, whenever we rolled up to the trailhead. Polygon is a consumer direct operation, which means riders can go to the company's website and have a bike delivered straight to their door. Available in sizes S, M, L, and XL, the 27.5” wheeled Collosus N9 retails for $5799 USD.
Collosus N9 Details
• Intended use: all-mountain / enduro
• Wheel size: 27.5''
• Rear wheel travel: 160mm
• Carbon fiber frame, aluminum links
• FS3 suspension
• Fox Float 34 CTD fork
• Fox Float X shock
• Weight: 29.8lbs (w/o pedals)
• MSRP: $5,799 USD
Frame DetailsThe N9's looks are polarizing, which is usually the case when a bike's appearance deviates from the norm as much as this one does. The rectangular junction where the top and down tubes meet the head tube and the diagonal lines at the rear of the bike combine to make a frame shape that's 'unique', to say the least. But despite its out-of-the-ordinary appearance, the N9 possesses the features we've come to expect on today's all-mountain bikes such as internal cable routing, including the ability to run a stealth dropper post, 12x142 rear dropouts, ISCG 05 tabs, and a press-fit bottom bracket. There are also molded chainslap guards on the rear swingarm, although, surprisingly, there's no down tube protection in place to prevent rocks and other objects from damaging the carbon frame. There's also no spot to mount a water bottle, which isn't deal breaker, but would have been a nice addition, especially for those quick laps where you don't want to carry a pack.
As far as geometry goes, the Polygon has a 66.3 degree head angle and a chain stay length of 431mm, numbers that are on par for a bike intended for all-mountain usage. The forward positioning of the links that join the bike's front and rear triangles makes the relatively short chain stay length possible, although this does come at the cost of tire clearance – there's a reason the bike comes with a 2.25” version of Schwalbe's Hans Dampf tire in the rear instead of the 2.35” width found in the front. A 2.35” Hans Dampf will fit, but the clearance around the front of the chainstays is minimal, and on a muddy ride any mud or grit picked up by the tire would end up getting ground right into the carbon frame.
Suspension LayoutThe N9 uses Polygon's FS3 suspension design, which uses two aluminum links to join the carbon front triangle to the carbon rear swingarm, with the rear shock mounted to the links, thus creating a floating suspension design. This is the third generation of Polygon's take on a dual link suspension design, with the current revision designed to remain neutral during pedaling while having an improved leverage curve. The N9's rather slack seat tube angle creates enough room for the swingarm to go through all of its travel without hitting the frame. The longer, lower link has a u-shaped portion that allows it to wrap around the base of the seat tube and connect to the swingarm. The left side of the swingarm has a diagonal support in place, a feature intended to provide additional frame stiffness.
Specifications
|
Price
|
$5799 |
|
Travel |
160mm |
|
Rear Shock |
Fox Float X Adj CTD Factory kashima |
|
Fork |
Fox 34 Float TALAS Remote CTD, 160mm |
|
Cassette |
SRAM XG-1199 10-42 |
|
Crankarms |
SRAM XX1 32T 170mm |
|
Rear Derailleur |
SRAM XX1 Type 2 |
|
Chain |
SRAM CN-XX1 |
|
Shifter Pods |
SRAM XX1 |
|
Handlebar |
Spank Oozy LTD 740mm |
|
Stem |
Spank Oozy LTD |
|
Brakes |
Shimano XT, 180mm rotors |
|
Wheelset |
e*thirteen TRS Race |
|
Tires |
Schwalbe Hans Dampf, 2.35" F, 2.25" rear |
|
Seat |
Fizik Gobi XM |
|
Seatpost |
RockShox Reverb Stealth |
|
| |
| Given the right terrain, the N9 will zip around like a bat on crack, seeking out every little bonus trail feature, hidden jump or transfer line available. |
Climbing The N9 is a nimble climber, and on the trail feels lighter than its 30+ pound weight would suggest. In fact, if we'd been asked to guess how much it weighed we would have pegged it as being a couple pounds less than it actually is, which is a good thing. This light ride feel made it easy to find the motivation to put out a solid effort when confronted with tricky climbs, climbs that the N9 didn't have any trouble with. Whether it was multiple tight switchbacks in a row, or a long section of awkwardly spaced roots, the N9 maintained excellent traction with quick and predictable handling. The rear wheel grip available for the climbs was impressive, and it seemed as if the harder you pushed down on the pedals the more the rear wheel would dig in, giving that extra traction that can make the difference between cleaning a climb or getting spit off to the side of the trail. We did find that there was a visibly noticeable amount of lateral movement in the seat stays during hard out of the saddle efforts, but this didn't seem to have any affect on the bike's climbing abilities.
The FOX Float X rear shock will cycle rhythmically through the first quarter or so of its travel if it is left wide open for the climbs, but flipping it into Trail mode immediately quiets this movement down, and still allows the shock to have enough compliance to provide grip on the trickiest ascents. It's fairly easy to reach down to flip the Float X's CTD switch for those on-the-fly settings changes, but it seemed odd that the handlebar mounted remote controls the front fork's compression damping instead of the rear shock's. Given the choice, and if we were forced to have a handlebar mounted remote at all, we'd rather have it control the rear shock, as the ability to firm up the rear end makes a much bigger difference on the climbs than adjusting the front fork. The N9's 34 Float also has a travel adjust dial that switches the fork between 160 and 130mm of travel, but this feature rarely saw use, and most of our time was spent in the longer travel mode.
DescendingOn the descents, the N9 has the manners of a go-cart, a quick, lively ride that can get up to speed in a hurry, but, just like with those rental carts, there's a limit to how wild you can get. The N9's rear suspension was very supple and sensitive to terrain changes, and turned out to be highly effective at absorbing small to medium sized hits, which made it easy to carry good speed through rough sections of trail. However, when faced with larger drops or harsh g-outs, the N9 reached the end of its travel rather quickly - there didn't seem to be a strong enough ramp up to prevent it from bottoming out. At the front of the bike, even though Fox has done well to improve the feel of their 34 series forks in Descend mode, we still preferred the increased low speed compression provided by running the N9's TALAS Float in Trail mode the majority of the time.
The N9 likes nothing better than diving in and out of corners, but when pushed hard, especially on firm ground, the rear end of the bike doesn't provide the rock solid support needed to allow a rider to redline it without hesitation. Some of the blame for this lack of cornering support may lay with the swingarm flex we noticed on the climbs - this motion is amplified by the forces generated while blasting through a berm. Still, although there are limits to how aggressively you can ride the N9, it's a remarkably fun ride up to that point, and we had a good time trying to figure out exactly where those limits were. Given the right terrain, the N9 will zip around like a bat on crack, seeking out every little bonus trail feature, hidden jump or transfer line available. It's remarkably peppy for a bike with 160mm of travel, which makes it easier to navigate it through sections of trail that require multiple quick direction changes in a row.
Component Check• Spank Oozy stem and handlebar: As we mentioned in our
review a few months ago, the Oozy bars are well made, but at 740mm are narrower than we prefer. A bike aimed at aggressive all-mountain riding should come with wider bars.
• FOX 34 TALAS with CTD remote: The handlebar mounted remote that allows riders to switch between Climb, Trail, or Descend mode with their right thumb isn't something that seems necessary, and we typically spent more time adjusting the CTD setting on the rear shock rather than the front. The same goes with the fork's TALAS feature – we rarely used it, and on the whole would have preferred the standard FOX 34 Float without all of the bells and whistles.
• Fizik Gobi XM seat: Seats are a matter of personal preference, but we never quite came to terms with the shape of the Gobi. Its narrow, rounded profile made it tricky to find the correct sit bone positioning.
• e*thirteen TRSr wheelset: Part way through a ride the rear cassette stopped freewheeling, turning the bike into a carbon fiber fixie. Our best trailside efforts couldn't repair it, but back at the shop it turned out that the freehub lockring had worked its way loose behind the cassette, making it unable to freewheel. It was a five minute fix, and the freehub was trouble free after that, but it would be worth check the lockring periodically to prevent this from happening. We also found that the wheels came out of true rather easily, although the rims themselves held up well.
• Shimano XT brakes: We're glad to see that it's becoming more common for companies to spec Shimano brakes even on bikes equipped with SRAM's 1x11 drivetrain. The XT brakes' power and lever feel still places them above just about anything else on the market.
Pinkbike's Take: | Although it's billed as being an enduro race or all-mountain machine, Polygon's Collosus N9 is more like a trail bike with a little extra cushion - nimble and lively, and capable of handling technical trails, but within reason. It wouldn't be our first choice for an enduro race bike, as the speeds and hairball terrain associated with racing would be better suited to a more solid ride. It's the lack of rear end stiffness and the slightly quirky component selection that takes the N9's performance down a notch, but the bike does have potential, and with a few tweaks its performance could easily be raised to the next level. It will be interesting to see what the future holds for Polygon, especially with their focus on consumer direct sales - will the cost savings that are associated with this business model be enough to steer consumers away from more well known brands? - Mike Kazimer |
MENTIONS www.polygonbikes.us and
www.bicyclesonline.com.au
But, I do like curving top tubes though.
This sport is so unaffordable. It's getting exhausting to watch the prices rise. The technology that made our sport possible is becoming the thing that's making it unaffordable.
I get those dilemmas either have food in my fridge or buy some new parts or get my bike serviced sometimes I go with number 2 and starve for 2 weeks till my next pay...Kinda like a junkie but with bikes but with a job...
Pinkbike, I'm glad to read that you guys picked up on the light and nimble trail feel, dynamic tracking and grip in your test rides. I'm curious about a few things though, I'm running a 2.4 Maxxis Highroller 2 in the back and have never had a mud clearance issue. In the Amazon jungle. I'd wage anything that the N9 I've been testing has seen more abuse that you guys were able to dish it on this test. Especially huge high and low speed compression hits pinning these 9,000' rocky, muddy descents. In my humble opinion N9 loved em, and pulled on everyone down these monsters. Curious about your suspension settings?
Maxxis 2.4" = Anyone elses 2.2"
Dynamic tracking. Is that marketing speak for bendy?
In the review he mentions wheels not staying in true, which tells me they aren't staying in tension either.
How much of what he was feeling was rear wheel related?
They can't be both
But whatever, this bike does not appeal to me visually, and the rear triangle just extends in a way that is a deal breaker enough for me. The fact that the PB article addresses the flex and how it's not a bike they would want to race with, says loads to me. Because, with all due respect to my friends who make this website great, they have a tendency to throw softballs in a lot of the bike reviews here.
"Its a bit heavy, yet also too flexy. Something actually quite difficult to achieve on a nearly full carbon frame. It looks like nothing else on the market (except for a Marin Quake, and we all know how popular those weren't). The suspension is bobby whilst climbing but also blows through its travel during aggressive descending. The shock has a lock out that you will be using regularly so please be careful not to cut your fingers off whilst reaching down blindly into that mess of pivots and chainrings near the lockout lever, half way up a tricky climb. The forward pivot locations allow for a short rear end making the bike quite "fun" although be careful whilst having "fun" as it is easy to push the suspension beyond its limits. The downside of the short rear end is there is no room for a sensible sized tyre, a lot of unsprung-weight and a lot of leverage on those rather small pivot bearings. In short, the whole thing was crap apart from the brakes. We don't even particularly like the way it looks.
However, for some reason we like it anyway. Perhaps it's those ugly duckling looks that make us feel slightly sorry for it."
Am I far off the mark there?
Erm, what?
How many people have you heard saying 26" are heavy and flexy? Quite the opposite is true.
Poor suspension performance has absolutely nothing to do with wheel size.
A short back end is easier to achieve with a small wheel yes, and that is a good thing.
Again, long swingarms (with the high unsprung weight and added flex) are more of a big wheel problem.
Tyre clearance issues, again a big wheel thing.
Ugly bikes are definately a big wheel issue.
So Willie, what exactly were you talking about???
@Polygon:
Tbh I wasn't trying to insult the bike, more point out that PB seemed to list a whole load of reasons they didn't like it, and no reasons that they did. However they clearly did like the bike, so I was pushing for them to point out the reasons why, as I'd like to hear them.
However...
If you can capture flex on a go-pro whilst descending (almost none = there is some) then there is waay too much flex.
Switching your lock-out lever with your foot suggests that perhaps the lever could be better placed?
If you can fit a Minion 2.5 in there with mud clearance then I am happy there is enough room. However rim width has pretty much zero affect on tyre width and a Maxxis 2.5 is roughly equal to a Schwalbe 2.35
I have tried XT brakes. They are awesome! To be honest a Deore brake has been doing an admirable job on the rear of my DH bike for some months now. UK only tho .